Compare StocksCOP vs XOM

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, COP is overvalued at $133, with a DCF intrinsic value of $116 and a margin of safety of -15%. XOM is overvalued at $163, with an intrinsic value of $112 and a margin of safety of -46%. Of the two, COP has the wider margin of safety.

COP
ConocoPhillips
$133.19
VS
XOM
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
$163.27

Rewards

COP
    XOM
    • Altman Z-Score of 4.16 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

    Risks

    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 17.6x is 46% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    XOM
    • ROIC has declined by 12.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 21.0x is 64% above the historical average of 12.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    COP
    XOM
    Valuation
    $7.69B
    Free Cash Flow
    $20.67B
    4.81%
    FCF Yield
    3.08%
    17.64
    Trailing P/E
    21.01
    13.85
    Forward P/E
    15.13
    Quality & Moat
    18.10%
    ROIC
    14.66%
    14.18%
    ROE
    12.58%
    47.57%
    Gross Margin
    29.77%
    1.12
    PEG Ratio
    1.40
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.24
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.12
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.58
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.47
    2.54%
    Dividend Yield
    2.52%
    COP: 7Ties: 2XOM: 3
    COPXOM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    XOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    XOM
    $1.06
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $49.66B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$52.66B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    COP
    50.0% Overvalued
    Price is 50.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $133.19
    Fair Value: $88.81
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    XOM
    46.1% Overvalued
    Price is 46.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $163.27
    Fair Value: $111.72
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $133?

    +9.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.5%

    The market implies +9.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    XOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $163?

    +14.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    COP
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    XOM
    48/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    XOM
    -2.74
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 86.9%Retail & Other 13.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,070
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    XOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.1%Retail & Other 32.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,204
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,000
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    XOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $129.54M
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $2.02M
    @ $134.51 · 2026-08-20
    MULLIGAN SHARMILA
    Director
    $234,906
    @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $888,651
    @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.49M
    @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    HRAP HEATHER GRACE
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    XOM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    COP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    XOM
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    XOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View COP Full AnalysisView XOM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: COP vs XOM

    Is ConocoPhillips or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, COP trades at a -15.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $116 vs. price $133), compared to XOM's -46.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $112 vs. $163).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, ConocoPhillips or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    XOM scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is ConocoPhillips in financial distress?

    COP's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. XOM scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, ConocoPhillips or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    ConocoPhillips (COP) generates a 4.8% free cash flow yield, compared to ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's 3.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ConocoPhillips or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    COP earns 18.1% ROIC versus XOM's 14.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, ConocoPhillips's or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's?

    COP's dividend earns a safety score of 78/100 (Safe), compared to XOM's 69/100 (Safe). COP has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.