Compare StocksLOW vs XOM

Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) vs ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-05, LOW is undervalued at $218, with a DCF intrinsic value of $101485759367 and a margin of safety of 100%. XOM is undervalued at $154, with an intrinsic value of $459379071521 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, XOM has the wider margin of safety.

LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
$218.08
VS
XOM
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
$153.96

Rewards

LOW
  • Lowe's Companies, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lowe's Companies, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
XOM

    Risks

    LOW
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.05 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Beneish M-Score of 8.81 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
    • Insiders have sold $5.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    XOM
    • ROIC has declined by 12.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 26.0x is 103% above the historical average of 12.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    LOW
    XOM
    Valuation
    $7.65B
    Free Cash Flow
    $20.67B
    0.00%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    18.07
    Trailing P/E
    26.01
    16.20
    Forward P/E
    14.58
    Quality & Moat
    18.17%
    ROIC
    14.66%
    N/A
    ROE
    12.58%
    33.29%
    Gross Margin
    29.77%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.31
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.12
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    3.32
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.47
    2.36%
    Dividend Yield
    2.66%
    LOW: 3Ties: 2XOM: 4
    LOWXOM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    LOW

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    XOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    LOW
    $-0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $13.60B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-4.47
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    XOM
    $0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $49.66B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$10.04
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    LOW
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $218.08
    Fair Value: $101485759367.12
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    XOM
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $153.96
    Fair Value: $459379071520.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    LOW

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $218?

    -8.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -10.8%

    The market implies -8.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -10.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    XOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $154?

    -30.0%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    LOW
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    XOM
    48/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    LOW
    8.81
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    XOM
    -2.74
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    LOW
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 81.4%Retail & Other 18.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,308
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    XOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 68.5%Retail & Other 31.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,321
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    LOW
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $231,063
    SIMKINS LAWRENCE
    Director
    $231,063
    @ $231.06 · 2025-11-24
    SIMKINS LAWRENCE
    Director
    $245,532
    @ $245.53 · 2024-12-20
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    XOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    LOW
    3
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $38.11M
    VAGELL MARGRETHE RAUB
    Officer
    $559,575
    @ $223.83 · 2026-06-18
    PRYOR JULIETTE WILLIAMS
    Officer
    $2.10M
    @ $224.81 · 2026-06-17
    DUPRE JANICE M.
    Officer
    $3.14M
    @ $221.90 · 2026-06-16
    VANCE QUONTA D
    Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $257.54 · 2026-03-04
    ELLISON MARVIN R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.70M
    @ $261.17 · 2026-01-09
    MCFARLAND JOSEPH MICHAEL III
    Officer
    $11.94M
    @ $272.60 · 2025-09-11
    SINK BRANDON J.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $268.58 · 2025-09-05
    PRYOR JULIETTE WILLIAMS
    Officer
    $238,939
    @ $257.20 · 2025-08-26
    ELLISON MARVIN R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.56M
    @ $264.10 · 2025-08-20
    DUPRE JANICE M.
    Officer
    $350,039
    @ $224.38 · 2025-06-10
    PRYOR JULIETTE WILLIAMS
    Officer
    $257,077
    @ $227.50 · 2025-06-03
    VANCE QUONTA D
    Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $274.37 · 2024-11-27
    MCFARLAND JOSEPH MICHAEL III
    Officer
    $1.08M
    @ $270.74 · 2024-10-03
    GODBOLE SEEMANTINI P
    Chief Technology Officer
    $7.12M
    @ $271.73 · 2024-10-03
    VAGELL MARGRETHE RAUB
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $271.45 · 2024-10-02
    GRIGGS DAN CLAYTON JR.
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $248.82 · 2024-09-12
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    XOM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    LOW
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    XOM
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    LOW
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    XOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View LOW Full AnalysisView XOM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: LOW vs XOM

    Is Lowe's Companies, Inc. or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, XOM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $459379071521 vs. price $154), compared to LOW's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $101485759367 vs. $218).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Lowe's Companies, Inc. or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    LOW scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while XOM scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Lowe's Companies, Inc. in financial distress?

    LOW's Altman Z-Score of 2.0 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. XOM scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Lowe's Companies, Inc. or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    LOW earns 18.2% ROIC versus XOM's 14.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's?

    LOW's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to XOM's 69/100 (Safe). LOW has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    Does Lowe's Companies, Inc. have accounting red flags?

    LOW's Beneish M-Score of 8.8 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, XOM scores -2.7, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.