ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
As of 2026-08-03, COP is fairly valued at $118, with a DCF intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -5%. LOW is undervalued at $210, with an intrinsic value of $101593479341 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, LOW has the wider margin of safety.
Rewards
- ★Lowe's Companies, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★Lowe's Companies, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
Risks
- ⚠ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
- ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
- ⚠FCF yield of 5.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
- ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.05 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
- ⚠Beneish M-Score of 8.81 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
- ⚠Insiders have sold $5.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →What growth rate is the market pricing in at $118?
The market implies +7.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $210?
The market implies -8.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.
Standard FCF implies a more demanding -10.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →M-Score Trend
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
Frequently Asked Questions: COP vs LOW
Is ConocoPhillips or Lowe's Companies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼
Based on our discounted cash flow model, LOW trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $101593479341 vs. price $210), compared to COP's -4.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $118).
Which stock has a wider economic moat, ConocoPhillips or Lowe's Companies, Inc.?▼
LOW scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.
Is Lowe's Companies, Inc. in financial distress?▼
LOW's Altman Z-Score of 2.0 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COP scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.
Which company has better free cash flow, ConocoPhillips or Lowe's Companies, Inc.?▼
ConocoPhillips (COP) generates a 5.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s 0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.
Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ConocoPhillips or Lowe's Companies, Inc.?▼
LOW earns 18.2% ROIC versus COP's 11.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.
Which dividend is safer, ConocoPhillips's or Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s?▼
LOW's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to COP's 78/100 (Safe). LOW has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.
Does Lowe's Companies, Inc. have accounting red flags?▼
LOW's Beneish M-Score of 8.8 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, COP scores -2.9, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.