Compare StocksNEE vs XOM

NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) vs ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, NEE is overvalued at $87, with a DCF intrinsic value of $25 and a margin of safety of -251%. XOM is undervalued at $155, with an intrinsic value of $459379071521 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, XOM has the wider margin of safety.

NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
$86.92
VS
XOM
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
$155.44

Rewards

NEE
  • Gross margin of 61.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.5x is 24% below the historical average of 25.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
XOM

    Risks

    NEE
    • NextEra Energy, Inc. scores only 24/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • High leverage (1.57x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 7.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    XOM
    • ROIC has declined by 12.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 26.2x is 104% above the historical average of 12.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    NEE
    XOM
    Valuation
    $-17.77B
    Free Cash Flow
    $20.67B
    -9.80%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    19.53
    Trailing P/E
    26.17
    19.67
    Forward P/E
    14.69
    Quality & Moat
    4.01%
    ROIC
    14.66%
    11.68%
    ROE
    12.58%
    61.02%
    Gross Margin
    29.77%
    1.90
    PEG Ratio
    1.32
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.57
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.12
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    7.35
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.47
    2.87%
    Dividend Yield
    2.65%
    NEE: 3Ties: 1XOM: 7
    NEEXOM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    NEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    XOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    NEE
    $0.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $8.39B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.11B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    XOM
    $0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $49.66B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$10.04
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    NEE
    251.5% Overvalued
    Price is 251.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $86.92
    Fair Value: $24.73
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    XOM
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $155.44
    Fair Value: $459379071520.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    NEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    XOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $155?

    -30.0%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    NEE
    24/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    XOM
    48/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    NEE
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    XOM
    -2.74
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    NEE
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.0%Retail & Other 12.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,837
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    XOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 68.8%Retail & Other 31.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,341
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    NEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    XOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    NEE
    0
    Sells (3M)
    16
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $32.87M
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $458,862
    @ $93.00 · 2026-03-13
    CREWS TERRELL KIRK II
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $646,423
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $347,088
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $482,505
    @ $95.00 · 2026-02-17
    KETCHUM JOHN W.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.90M
    @ $89.34 · 2026-02-09
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $920,210
    @ $85.00 · 2026-01-22
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $985,481
    @ $81.25 · 2025-12-11
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Director
    $12.18M
    @ $83.91 · 2025-11-17
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $906,880
    @ $80.00 · 2025-10-03
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $62,943
    @ $77.90 · 2025-10-01
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $63,365
    @ $74.90 · 2025-09-25
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $60,827
    @ $71.90 · 2025-09-12
    DUNNE MICHAEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $707,900
    @ $70.79 · 2025-09-08
    COFFEY ROBERT
    Officer
    $538,800
    @ $71.84 · 2025-07-28
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $168,718
    @ $77.50 · 2025-07-22
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $75.00 · 2025-05-16
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.66M
    @ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer
    $162,258
    @ $68.09 · 2025-02-18
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $302,809
    @ $75.57 · 2024-11-12
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $3.19M
    @ $85.00 · 2024-09-16
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $7.95M
    @ $80.00 · 2024-08-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    XOM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    NEE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    XOM
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    NEE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    XOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View NEE Full AnalysisView XOM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: NEE vs XOM

    Is NextEra Energy, Inc. or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, XOM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $459379071521 vs. price $155), compared to NEE's -251.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $25 vs. $87).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, NextEra Energy, Inc. or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    XOM scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while NEE scores 24/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is NextEra Energy, Inc. in financial distress?

    NEE's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. XOM scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, NextEra Energy, Inc. or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    XOM earns 14.7% ROIC versus NEE's 4.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, NextEra Energy, Inc.'s or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's?

    XOM's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to NEE's 54/100 (Borderline). XOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.