SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › DE vs TMO

Deere & Company (DE) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, DE is undervalued at $589, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1030 and a margin of safety of 43%. TMO is overvalued at $465, with an intrinsic value of $407 and a margin of safety of -14%. Of the two, DE has the wider margin of safety.

DE
Deere & Company
$589.24
VS
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
$464.61

Rewards

DE
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 52.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
TMO
  • ★Trailing P/E of 25.5x is 21% below the historical average of 32.3x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 3.85 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

DE
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 33.3x is 87% above the historical average of 17.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠High leverage (3.08x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
TMO
  • ⚠21 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DE
TMO
Valuation
$3.23B
Free Cash Flow
$5.52B
2.03%
FCF Yield
3.20%
33.33
Trailing P/E
25.53
25.78
Forward P/E
17.05
Quality & Moat
10.65%
ROIC
6.71%
18.35%
ROE
13.52%
25.96%
Gross Margin
40.93%
1.78
PEG Ratio
1.55
Balance Sheet Safety
3.08
Net Debt / Equity
0.77
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.60
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.53
1.11%
Dividend Yield
0.40%
DE: 3Ties: 1TMO: 8
DETMO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TMO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DE
$-0.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$17.54B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TMO
$0.17
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$17.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.95B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DE
42.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 42.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $589.24
Fair Value: $1029.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TMO
14.3% Overvalued
Price is 14.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $464.61
Fair Value: $406.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $589?

+17.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +23.1%

The market implies +17.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +23.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TMO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $465?

+11.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.6%

The market implies +11.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DE
50/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TMO
60/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DE
-2.52
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TMO
-2.47
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DE
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 82.8%Retail & Other 17.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,298
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TMO
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,536
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TMO
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CHAI NELSON J
Director
$11,038
@ $551.90 · 2024-12-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DE
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $32.47M
REED CORY J.
Officer
$6.12M
@ $510.00 · 2026-01-14
MAY JOHN C. II
Chief Executive Officer
$20.80M
@ $501.49 · 2026-01-08
MAY JOHN C. II
Chief Executive Officer
$5.55M
@ $500.08 · 2025-11-25
KALATHUR RAJESH
Chief Technology Officer
$12.30M
@ $500.61 · 2025-02-18
REED CORY J.
Officer
$5.05M
@ $377.63 · 2024-06-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TMO
1
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $110.57M
PETTITI GIANLUCA
President
$185,064
@ $462.66 · 2026-04-27
SHAFER MICHAEL D
Officer
$802,536
@ $499.40 · 2026-03-11
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$2.06M
@ $514.82 · 2026-03-05
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$5.08M
@ $507.75 · 2026-03-04
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$216,480
@ $541.20 · 2026-02-09
LAGARDE MICHEL
Chief Operating Officer
$12.42M
@ $563.56 · 2025-12-04
LAGARDE MICHEL
Chief Operating Officer
$36.13M
@ $582.68 · 2025-12-03
LOWERY FREDERICK M.
Officer
$8.15M
@ $589.81 · 2025-12-02
SHAFER MICHAEL D
Officer
$6.43M
@ $600.00 · 2025-11-25
LAGARDE MICHEL
Chief Operating Officer
$2.76M
@ $594.42 · 2025-11-13
BRITT LISA P
Officer
$622,136
@ $588.59 · 2025-11-12
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$1.73M
@ $580.00 · 2025-11-10
BRITT LISA P
Officer
$5.84M
@ $571.62 · 2025-11-07
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$13.91M
@ $571.33 · 2025-10-27
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$229,660
@ $574.15 · 2025-10-24
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$200,201
@ $500.50 · 2025-09-05
HOLMES JOSEPH R.
Officer
$189,662
@ $492.63 · 2025-08-29
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$5.01M
@ $500.96 · 2025-08-22
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$248,046
@ $500.09 · 2025-08-20
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$8.15M
@ $452.99 · 2025-08-07
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$191,992
@ $479.98 · 2025-07-25
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$164,444
@ $411.11 · 2025-05-12
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$128,979
@ $429.93 · 2025-04-28
BOXER MICHAEL A
General Counsel
$2.01M
@ $532.59 · 2025-03-10
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$9.33M
@ $518.16 · 2025-03-05
SHAFER MICHAEL D
Officer
$945,038
@ $530.92 · 2025-03-03
LOWERY FREDERICK M.
Officer
$9.73M
@ $531.81 · 2025-02-24
CHAI NELSON J
Director
$8,449
@ $528.06 · 2025-02-19
WILLIAMSON STEPHEN
Chief Financial Officer
$11.58M
@ $589.36 · 2025-02-04
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$175,677
@ $585.59 · 2025-02-04
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$10.62M
@ $531.23 · 2024-12-03
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$3.26M
@ $557.89 · 2024-11-01
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$11.01M
@ $550.51 · 2024-10-31
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$11.05M
@ $552.46 · 2024-10-29
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$168,048
@ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
BOXER MICHAEL A
General Counsel
$1.12M
@ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$12.17M
@ $608.45 · 2024-09-04
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$6.17M
@ $617.21 · 2024-07-31
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$9.88M
@ $606.12 · 2024-07-30
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$180,255
@ $600.85 · 2024-07-26
HOLMES JOSEPH R.
Officer
$525,484
@ $611.03 · 2024-07-26
BRITT LISA P
Officer
$2.22M
@ $613.02 · 2024-07-26
BOXER MICHAEL A
General Counsel
$1.20M
@ $600.85 · 2024-07-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DE
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TMO
FearGreed
😨Fear(40/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
TMO
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
View DE Full AnalysisView TMO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DE vs TMO

Is Deere & Company or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DE trades at a 42.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1030 vs. price $589), compared to TMO's -14.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $407 vs. $465).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Deere & Company or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.?▼

TMO scores 60/100 (Narrow moat), while DE scores 50/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Deere & Company in financial distress?▼

DE's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TMO scores 3.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Deere & Company or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.?▼

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) generates a 3.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Deere & Company's 2.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Deere & Company or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.?▼

DE earns 10.7% ROIC versus TMO's 6.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Deere & Company's or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.'s?▼

TMO's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to DE's 94/100 (Very Safe). TMO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.