Compare Stocks › PFE vs PKG

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Packaging Corporation of America (PKG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, PFE is overvalued at $31, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -36%. PKG is undervalued at $257, with an intrinsic value of $617 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, PKG has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$30.52
VS
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
$256.82

Rewards

PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
PKG
  • ★Packaging Corporation of America has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 3.79 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 40.2x is 32% above the historical average of 30.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
PKG
  • ⚠Gross margin of 21.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 31.7x is 59% above the historical average of 19.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
PKG
Valuation
$12.49B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
7.18%
FCF Yield
N/A
40.16
Trailing P/E
31.67
10.57
Forward P/E
18.04
Quality & Moat
9.42%
ROIC
12.81%
5.01%
ROE
16.49%
74.72%
Gross Margin
21.24%
13.98
PEG Ratio
1.62
Balance Sheet Safety
0.61
Net Debt / Equity
0.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.04
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.92
5.64%
Dividend Yield
2.34%
PFE: 4Ties: 1PKG: 5
PFEPKG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PKG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PKG
$6.95
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$997.1M
Δ Market Cap
+$6.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
36.1% Overvalued
Price is 36.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.52
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PKG
58.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 58.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $256.82
Fair Value: $617.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $31?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.3%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PKG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PKG
62/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PKG
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,681
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PKG
Insiders 1.6%Institutions 100.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,277
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PKG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PKG
3
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.00M
SHIRLEY DONALD R.
Officer
$3.01M
@ $250.71 · 2026-08-20
HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
President
$1.79M
@ $254.00 · 2026-08-07
HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
President
$5.39M
@ $252.89 · 2026-08-05
KOWLZAN MARK W
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $217.08 · 2026-05-27
HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
President
$2.80M
@ $230.50 · 2026-02-05
KOWLZAN MARK W
Chief Executive Officer
$5.40M
@ $215.97 · 2025-09-11
VAUGHN JOSEPH
Officer
$563,253
@ $244.89 · 2024-12-03
STECKO PAUL T
Director
$2.57M
@ $244.91 · 2024-11-21
SHIRLEY DONALD R.
Officer
$1.92M
@ $240.20 · 2024-11-12
MUNDY ROBERT P
Chief Financial Officer
$3.01M
@ $240.62 · 2024-11-08
KOWLZAN MARK W
Chief Executive Officer
$16.00M
@ $240.03 · 2024-11-08
HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
Officer
$4.78M
@ $242.04 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PKG
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
PKG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View PFE Full AnalysisView PKG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs PKG

Is Pfizer Inc. or Packaging Corporation of America more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PKG trades at a 58.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $617 vs. price $257), compared to PFE's -36.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $31).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer Inc. or Packaging Corporation of America?▼

PKG scores 62/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?▼

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PKG scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer Inc. or Packaging Corporation of America?▼

PKG earns 12.8% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer Inc.'s or Packaging Corporation of America's?▼

PKG's dividend earns a safety score of 63/100 (Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). PKG has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

PFE vs PKG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io