Compare StocksKO vs XOM

Coca-Cola Company (The) (KO) vs ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, KO is overvalued at $88, with a DCF intrinsic value of $55 and a margin of safety of -58%. XOM is undervalued at $155, with an intrinsic value of $459379071521 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, XOM has the wider margin of safety.

KO
Coca-Cola Company (The)
$87.59
VS
XOM
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
$155.44

Rewards

KO
  • Coca-Cola Company (The) has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 61.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Coca-Cola Company (The) scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
XOM

    Risks

    KO
    • FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 4.22 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 9 insider sales totaling $134.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    XOM
    • ROIC has declined by 12.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 26.2x is 104% above the historical average of 12.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    KO
    XOM
    Valuation
    $5.22B
    Free Cash Flow
    $20.67B
    1.38%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    26.30
    Trailing P/E
    26.17
    24.84
    Forward P/E
    14.69
    Quality & Moat
    16.74%
    ROIC
    14.66%
    42.05%
    ROE
    12.58%
    61.89%
    Gross Margin
    29.77%
    4.22
    PEG Ratio
    1.32
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.73
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.12
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.64
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.47
    2.42%
    Dividend Yield
    2.65%
    KO: 3Ties: 2XOM: 6
    KOXOM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    KO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    XOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    KO
    $2.72
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $9.36B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$25.42B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    XOM
    $0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $49.66B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$10.04
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    KO
    57.9% Overvalued
    Price is 57.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $87.59
    Fair Value: $55.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    XOM
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $155.44
    Fair Value: $459379071520.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    KO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $88?

    +13.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +26.3%

    The market implies +13.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +26.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    XOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $155?

    -30.0%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    KO
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    XOM
    48/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    KO
    -2.38
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    XOM
    -2.74
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    KO
    Insiders 9.9%Institutions 68.4%Retail & Other 21.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,558
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    XOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 68.8%Retail & Other 31.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,341
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    KO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $998,676
    LEVCHIN MAX R
    Director
    $998,676
    @ $70.00 · 2025-10-24
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    XOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    KO
    9
    Sells (3M)
    24
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $224.68M
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chairman of the Board
    $47.47M
    @ $90.06 · 2026-07-29
    PIETRACCI BRUNO
    Divisional Officer
    $6.79M
    @ $89.65 · 2026-07-28
    MANN JENNIFER K
    Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $83.41 · 2026-06-10
    MANN JENNIFER K
    Officer
    $8.07M
    @ $80.75 · 2026-06-09
    MANN JENNIFER K
    Officer
    $7.95M
    @ $79.46 · 2026-06-08
    MANN JENNIFER K
    Officer
    $7.95M
    @ $79.46 · 2026-06-05
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chairman of the Board
    $35.60M
    @ $80.12 · 2026-06-05
    QUAN NANCY W
    Officer
    $2.56M
    @ $80.93 · 2026-05-15
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chairman of the Board
    $15.78M
    @ $78.90 · 2026-05-07
    DOUGLAS MONICA HOWARD
    Officer
    $1.85M
    @ $77.37 · 2026-03-09
    PIETRACCI BRUNO
    Divisional Officer
    $2.28M
    @ $79.41 · 2026-03-03
    QUAN NANCY W
    Officer
    $1.87M
    @ $79.50 · 2026-03-03
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.84M
    @ $79.14 · 2026-03-03
    MURPHY JOHN
    President
    $5.83M
    @ $80.52 · 2026-03-02
    PEREZ BEATRIZ R
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $81.00 · 2026-02-27
    PEREZ BEATRIZ R
    Officer
    $2.93M
    @ $80.69 · 2026-02-26
    DOUGLAS MONICA HOWARD
    Officer
    $1.60M
    @ $80.16 · 2026-02-25
    MURPHY JOHN
    President
    $8.00M
    @ $80.42 · 2026-02-25
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.05M
    @ $77.10 · 2026-02-03
    QUAN NANCY W
    Officer
    $2.25M
    @ $71.17 · 2025-11-17
    ARROYO MANUEL
    Officer
    $9.89M
    @ $70.80 · 2025-11-14
    BRAUN HENRIQUE GNANI
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.86M
    @ $70.93 · 2025-11-11
    DOUGLAS MONICA HOWARD
    Officer
    $947,464
    @ $69.93 · 2025-10-24
    KOUMETTIS NIKOLAOS
    Divisional Officer
    $2.58M
    @ $69.10 · 2025-08-05
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.20M
    @ $72.06 · 2025-05-30
    QUAN NANCY W
    Officer
    $2.02M
    @ $70.81 · 2025-05-09
    PEREZ BEATRIZ R
    Officer
    $4.34M
    @ $71.87 · 2025-05-08
    MURPHY JOHN
    President
    $6.39M
    @ $72.09 · 2025-05-07
    BRAUN HENRIQUE GNANI
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $71.47 · 2025-03-11
    KOUMETTIS NIKOLAOS
    Divisional Officer
    $3.94M
    @ $71.01 · 2025-03-07
    DOUGLAS MONICA HOWARD
    Officer
    $394,231
    @ $70.84 · 2025-02-26
    KOUMETTIS NIKOLAOS
    Divisional Officer
    $3.88M
    @ $70.96 · 2025-02-26
    QUAN NANCY W
    Officer
    $3.92M
    @ $71.36 · 2025-02-25
    CHANG LISA VIRGINIA
    Officer
    $961,352
    @ $71.50 · 2025-02-25
    PIETRACCI BRUNO
    Divisional Officer
    $1.34M
    @ $70.56 · 2025-02-24
    DOUGLAS MONICA HOWARD
    Officer
    $697,673
    @ $63.71 · 2024-11-22
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.40M
    @ $64.03 · 2024-11-08
    QUAN NANCY W
    Officer
    $1.32M
    @ $71.50 · 2024-08-27
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.97M
    @ $70.02 · 2024-08-26
    MANN JENNIFER K
    Officer
    $8.99M
    @ $69.52 · 2024-08-22
    CHANG LISA VIRGINIA
    Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $69.54 · 2024-08-21
    QUINCEY JAMES R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.18M
    @ $70.02 · 2024-08-21
    PEREZ BEATRIZ R
    Officer
    $2.43M
    @ $68.62 · 2024-08-08
    ARROYO MANUEL
    Officer
    $1.88M
    @ $68.22 · 2024-08-07
    CHANG LISA VIRGINIA
    Officer
    $3.98M
    @ $68.51 · 2024-08-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    XOM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    KO
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(66/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    XOM
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    KO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
    XOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View KO Full AnalysisView XOM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: KO vs XOM

    Is Coca-Cola Company (The) or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, XOM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $459379071521 vs. price $155), compared to KO's -57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $55 vs. $88).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Coca-Cola Company (The) or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    KO scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while XOM scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation in financial distress?

    XOM's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. KO scores 4.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Coca-Cola Company (The) or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

    KO earns 16.7% ROIC versus XOM's 14.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Coca-Cola Company (The)'s or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's?

    XOM's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to KO's 54/100 (Borderline). XOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    KO vs XOM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io