Compare StocksCOP vs INTU

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, COP is overvalued at $133, with a DCF intrinsic value of $116 and a margin of safety of -15%. INTU is undervalued at $318, with an intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

COP
ConocoPhillips
$132.54
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$318.13

Rewards

COP
    INTU
    • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 17.6x is 46% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    INTU

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      COP
      INTU
      Valuation
      $7.69B
      Free Cash Flow
      $8.62B
      4.83%
      FCF Yield
      10.14%
      17.55
      Trailing P/E
      19.34
      13.78
      Forward P/E
      11.63
      Quality & Moat
      18.10%
      ROIC
      10.90%
      14.18%
      ROE
      23.60%
      47.57%
      Gross Margin
      80.98%
      1.16
      PEG Ratio
      1.08
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.24
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.06
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.58
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.18
      2.54%
      Dividend Yield
      1.74%
      COP: 3Ties: 1INTU: 8
      COPINTU

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      COP

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      INTU

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      COP
      $-1.99
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $14.97B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-29.73B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      INTU
      $-11.48
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $7.83B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-89.89B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      COP
      49.2% Overvalued
      Price is 49.2% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $132.54
      Fair Value: $88.81
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      INTU
      43.7% Margin of Safety
      Price is 43.7% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $318.13
      Fair Value: $565.45
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      COP

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $133?

      +8.9%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +9.5%

      The market implies +8.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      INTU

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $318?

      +5.2%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -1.9%

      The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      COP
      38/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      INTU
      94/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      COP
      -2.89
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      INTU
      -2.98
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      COP
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 86.9%Retail & Other 13.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,070
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      INTU
      Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,541
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      COP
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $500,000
      MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
      Director
      $500,000
      @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
      JOHNSON KIRK L
      Officer
      $499,472
      @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
      MURTI ARJUN N
      Director
      $239,675
      @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
      WALKER R A
      Director
      $1.02M
      @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      INTU
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $541,665
      PRABHU VASANT M.
      Director
      $541,665
      @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      COP
      1
      Sells (3M)
      13
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $129.54M
      ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
      General Counsel
      $2.02M
      @ $134.51 · 2026-08-20
      MULLIGAN SHARMILA
      Director
      $234,906
      @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
      ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
      General Counsel
      $1.00M
      @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
      OLDS NICHOLAS G
      Officer
      $888,651
      @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
      LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $64.49M
      @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
      LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
      Officer
      $4.13M
      @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
      HRAP HEATHER GRACE
      Officer
      $317,631
      @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
      OLDS NICHOLAS G
      Officer
      $1.73M
      @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
      HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
      Officer
      $1.24M
      @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
      OLDS NICHOLAS G
      Officer
      $1.41M
      @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
      ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
      General Counsel
      $1.00M
      @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
      LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
      Director
      $4.75M
      @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
      LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $46.32M
      @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      INTU
      3
      Sells (3M)
      11
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $4.34M
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $92,728
      @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $314,288
      @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $74,499
      @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $80,145
      @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $289,448
      @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $457,046
      @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $840,097
      @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $741,172
      @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $219,763
      @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $435,354
      @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $792,160
      @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $665,951
      @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $27,930
      @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $255,887
      @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $521,891
      @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $689,400
      @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.03M
      @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $1.25M
      @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $887,583
      @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $1.36M
      @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.12M
      @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $26.12M
      @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $19.29M
      @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $30.46M
      @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
      MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
      General Counsel
      $12.18M
      @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $11.66M
      @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $340,143
      @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $5.00M
      @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $4.43M
      @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
      BURTON EVE B
      Director
      $1.02M
      @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $667,838
      @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $814,350
      @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $2.94M
      @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $68,506
      @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      COP
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(62/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      INTU
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(31/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      COP
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
      INTU
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
      View COP Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: COP vs INTU

      Is ConocoPhillips or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 43.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $318), compared to COP's -14.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $116 vs. $133).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, ConocoPhillips or Intuit Inc.?

      INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is ConocoPhillips in financial distress?

      COP's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, ConocoPhillips or Intuit Inc.?

      Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.1% free cash flow yield, compared to ConocoPhillips's 4.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ConocoPhillips or Intuit Inc.?

      COP earns 18.1% ROIC versus INTU's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, ConocoPhillips's or Intuit Inc.'s?

      INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to COP's 78/100 (Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.