Compare StocksINTC vs PKG

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Packaging Corporation of America (PKG)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
$204.39

Rewards

INTC
    PKG
    • Packaging Corporation of America has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.95 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • Altman Z-Score of 3.79 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PKG
    • Gross margin of 21.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Insiders have sold $2.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PKG
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $728.60M
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    3.96%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.82
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    16.62
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    10.74%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    16.72%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    21.80%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.95
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.98
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.45%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1PKG: 5
    INTCPKG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PKG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PKG
    $6.95
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $997.1M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.93B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PKG
    9.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 9.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $204.39
    Fair Value: $224.53
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PKG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $204?

    +12.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.4%

    The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PKG
    62/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PKG
    -2.67
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PKG
    Insiders 1.5%Institutions 99.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,213
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PKG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    GOWLAND KAREN E
    Director
    $54,618
    @ $182.06 · 2024-05-15
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PKG
    1
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.19M
    HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
    President
    $2.80M
    @ $230.50 · 2026-02-05
    KOWLZAN MARK W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.40M
    @ $215.97 · 2025-09-11
    VAUGHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $563,253
    @ $244.89 · 2024-12-03
    STECKO PAUL T
    Director
    $2.57M
    @ $244.91 · 2024-11-21
    SHIRLEY DONALD R.
    Officer
    $1.92M
    @ $240.20 · 2024-11-12
    KOWLZAN MARK W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.00M
    @ $240.03 · 2024-11-08
    MUNDY ROBERT P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $240.62 · 2024-11-08
    HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
    Officer
    $4.78M
    @ $242.04 · 2024-11-07
    CARTER CHARLES J
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $196.28 · 2024-07-25
    SHIRLEY DONALD R.
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $196.28 · 2024-07-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PKG
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    PKG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PKG Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io