Compare StocksINTC vs LOW

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
$233.33

Rewards

INTC
    LOW
    • Lowe's Companies, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Lowe's Companies, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Dividend yield of 2.06% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LOW
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.18 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • FCF yield of 5.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • PEG ratio of 2.48 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LOW
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $7.65B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    5.85%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    19.69
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    17.10
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    13.05%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    N/A
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    33.48%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.48
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.52
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.06%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1LOW: 4
    INTCLOW

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LOW

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LOW
    $-0.21
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $13.60B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-2.87B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LOW
    26.4% Overvalued
    Price is 26.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $233.33
    Fair Value: $184.65
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LOW

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $233?

    +11.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.5%

    The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LOW
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LOW
    8.81
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LOW
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 19.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,333
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LOW
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $231,063
    SIMKINS LAWRENCE
    Director
    $231,063
    @ $231.06 · 2025-11-24
    SIMKINS LAWRENCE
    Director
    $245,532
    @ $245.53 · 2024-12-20
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LOW
    1
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $32.92M
    VANCE QUONTA D
    Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $257.54 · 2026-03-04
    ELLISON MARVIN R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.70M
    @ $261.17 · 2026-01-09
    MCFARLAND JOSEPH MICHAEL III
    Officer
    $11.94M
    @ $272.60 · 2025-09-11
    SINK BRANDON J.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $268.58 · 2025-09-05
    PRYOR JULIETTE WILLIAMS
    Officer
    $238,939
    @ $257.20 · 2025-08-26
    ELLISON MARVIN R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.56M
    @ $264.10 · 2025-08-20
    DUPRE JANICE M.
    Officer
    $350,039
    @ $224.38 · 2025-06-10
    PRYOR JULIETTE WILLIAMS
    Officer
    $257,077
    @ $227.50 · 2025-06-03
    VANCE QUONTA D
    Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $274.37 · 2024-11-27
    MCFARLAND JOSEPH MICHAEL III
    Officer
    $1.08M
    @ $270.74 · 2024-10-03
    GODBOLE SEEMANTINI P
    Chief Technology Officer
    $7.12M
    @ $271.73 · 2024-10-03
    VAGELL MARGRETHE R
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $271.45 · 2024-10-02
    GRIGGS DAN CLAYTON JR.
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $248.82 · 2024-09-12
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LOW
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(42/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    LOW
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LOW Full Analysis
    INTC vs LOW: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io