Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs PKG

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Packaging Corporation of America (PKG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. PKG is undervalued at $257, with an intrinsic value of $617 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, PKG has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
$256.82

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PKG
  • ★Packaging Corporation of America has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 3.79 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GOOGL
    PKG
    • ⚠Gross margin of 21.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • ⚠Trailing P/E of 31.7x is 59% above the historical average of 19.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    PKG
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    31.67
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    18.04
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    12.81%
    44.29%
    ROE
    16.49%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    21.24%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.62
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.82
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.92
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    2.34%
    GOOGL: 7Ties: 2PKG: 1
    GOOGLPKG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    PKG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PKG
    $6.95
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $997.1M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.93B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PKG
    58.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 58.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $256.82
    Fair Value: $617.13
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PKG

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PKG
    62/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PKG
    -2.67
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PKG
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 100.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,277
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PKG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PKG
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $15.00M
    SHIRLEY DONALD R.
    Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $250.71 · 2026-08-20
    HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
    President
    $1.79M
    @ $254.00 · 2026-08-07
    HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
    President
    $5.39M
    @ $252.89 · 2026-08-05
    KOWLZAN MARK W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $217.08 · 2026-05-27
    HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
    President
    $2.80M
    @ $230.50 · 2026-02-05
    KOWLZAN MARK W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.40M
    @ $215.97 · 2025-09-11
    VAUGHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $563,253
    @ $244.89 · 2024-12-03
    STECKO PAUL T
    Director
    $2.57M
    @ $244.91 · 2024-11-21
    SHIRLEY DONALD R.
    Officer
    $1.92M
    @ $240.20 · 2024-11-12
    MUNDY ROBERT P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $240.62 · 2024-11-08
    KOWLZAN MARK W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.00M
    @ $240.03 · 2024-11-08
    HASSFURTHER THOMAS A
    Officer
    $4.78M
    @ $242.04 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PKG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    PKG
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView PKG Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs PKG

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Packaging Corporation of America more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, PKG trades at a 58.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $617 vs. price $257), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Packaging Corporation of America?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while PKG scores 62/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PKG scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Packaging Corporation of America?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus PKG's 12.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Packaging Corporation of America's?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to PKG's 63/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.