Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs PGR

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs The Progressive Corporation (PGR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. PGR is fairly valued at $231, with an intrinsic value of $288 and a margin of safety of 20%. Of the two, PGR has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
$231.28

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PGR
  • ★The Progressive Corporation scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 37.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.91 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GOOGL
    PGR
    • ⚠Gross margin of 17.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 4 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 70.60 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    PGR
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    11.65
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    14.19
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    24.22%
    44.29%
    ROE
    33.24%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    17.28%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    70.60
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.18
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.41
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    0.17%
    GOOGL: 6Ties: 1PGR: 3
    GOOGLPGR

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    PGR

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PGR
    $2.90
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $19.86B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$57.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PGR
    19.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 19.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $231.28
    Fair Value: $287.92
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PGR

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PGR
    99/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PGR
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PGR
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,487
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PGR
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PGR
    5
    Sells (3M)
    27
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $31.30M
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $273,567
    @ $223.32 · 2026-10-22
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $250,255
    @ $204.29 · 2026-09-24
    GRIFFITH SUSAN PATRICIA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.20M
    @ $219.50 · 2026-09-01
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $268,765
    @ $219.40 · 2026-08-20
    NIEDERST LORI A
    Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $209.29 · 2026-08-13
    QUIGG ANDREW J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $769,780
    @ $220.00 · 2026-07-28
    MURPHY JOHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $212.70 · 2026-07-27
    GRIFFITH SUSAN PATRICIA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.94M
    @ $212.71 · 2026-07-27
    BAUER JONATHAN S
    Chief Investment Officer
    $476,896
    @ $212.71 · 2026-07-27
    BAILO KAREN
    Officer
    $1.80M
    @ $212.71 · 2026-07-27
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $237,177
    @ $205.17 · 2026-07-23
    KELLY JEFFREY D
    Director
    $1.51M
    @ $216.33 · 2026-06-24
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $236,907
    @ $204.76 · 2026-06-22
    MURPHY JOHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $200.00 · 2026-06-05
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $231,400
    @ $200.00 · 2026-06-05
    JOHNSON DEVIN C
    Director
    $199,038
    @ $203.10 · 2026-04-16
    JOYCE CARL G.
    Officer
    $55,754
    @ $206.50 · 2026-03-20
    JOYCE CARL G.
    Officer
    $29,892
    @ $212.00 · 2026-03-05
    BAILO KAREN
    Officer
    $745,604
    @ $212.00 · 2026-03-05
    PUMAREJO MARIBEL
    Officer
    $150,138
    @ $203.44 · 2026-02-24
    BAUER JONATHAN S
    Chief Investment Officer
    $460,111
    @ $203.05 · 2026-02-23
    QUIGG ANDREW J
    Officer
    $336,973
    @ $204.35 · 2026-01-21
    BAUER JONATHAN S
    Chief Investment Officer
    $634,507
    @ $204.35 · 2026-01-21
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $302,131
    @ $224.80 · 2025-12-19
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $228.48 · 2025-11-28
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $307,050
    @ $228.29 · 2025-11-21
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $295,900
    @ $220.00 · 2025-11-11
    MURPHY JOHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $536,978
    @ $242.10 · 2025-09-19
    CALLAHAN PATRICK KEVIN
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $242.22 · 2025-09-19
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $325,624
    @ $242.10 · 2025-09-19
    GRIFFITH SUSAN PATRICIA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.54M
    @ $246.06 · 2025-09-02
    MURPHY JOHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $556,230
    @ $250.78 · 2025-08-22
    CALLAHAN PATRICK KEVIN
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $249.96 · 2025-08-22
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $337,299
    @ $250.78 · 2025-08-22
    NIEDERST LORI A
    Officer
    $2.02M
    @ $250.18 · 2025-08-14
    MURPHY JOHN JOSEPH
    President
    $552,814
    @ $249.24 · 2025-07-28
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.15M
    @ $249.24 · 2025-07-28
    CALLAHAN PATRICK KEVIN
    Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $242.16 · 2025-07-28
    GRIFFITH SUSAN PATRICIA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.42M
    @ $242.12 · 2025-07-28
    QUIGG ANDREW J
    Officer
    $795,325
    @ $249.24 · 2025-07-28
    BAUER JONATHAN S
    Chief Investment Officer
    $595,933
    @ $249.24 · 2025-07-28
    BAILO KAREN
    Officer
    $2.22M
    @ $249.24 · 2025-07-28
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $313,633
    @ $247.54 · 2025-07-18
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $263.79 · 2025-06-30
    MURPHY JOHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $260.38 · 2025-06-20
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $329,901
    @ $260.38 · 2025-06-20
    BURGDOERFER STUART B
    Director
    $958,643
    @ $260.43 · 2025-06-20
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.75M
    @ $275.37 · 2025-05-28
    BROZ STEVEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $351,985
    @ $277.81 · 2025-05-23
    VAN DYKE KAHINA
    Director
    $691,398
    @ $277.67 · 2025-05-22
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.69M
    @ $268.59 · 2025-04-28
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.76M
    @ $275.94 · 2025-03-28
    JOHNSON DEVIN C
    Director
    $110,016
    @ $275.04 · 2025-03-25
    JOYCE CARL G.
    Officer
    $99,420
    @ $276.17 · 2025-03-21
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $435,862
    @ $282.66 · 2025-03-17
    BAUER JONATHAN S
    Chief Investment Officer
    $479,391
    @ $282.66 · 2025-03-17
    CALLAHAN PATRICK KEVIN
    Officer
    $1.31M
    @ $279.70 · 2025-03-06
    BAUER JONATHAN S
    Chief Investment Officer
    $344,787
    @ $281.00 · 2025-03-06
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $279.94 · 2025-02-28
    NIEDERST LORI A
    Officer
    $952,416
    @ $247.06 · 2025-01-30
    KELLY JEFFREY D
    Director
    $2.50M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-01-29
    SAUERLAND JOHN PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.47M
    @ $246.69 · 2025-01-28
    MURPHY JOHN JOSEPH
    Officer
    $553,485
    @ $243.29 · 2025-01-22
    GRIFFITH SUSAN PATRICIA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $243.29 · 2025-01-22
    QUIGG ANDREW J
    Officer
    $234,045
    @ $243.29 · 2025-01-22
    MARSHALL MARIANN WOJTKUN
    Officer
    $142,325
    @ $243.29 · 2025-01-22
    BAILO KAREN
    Officer
    $515,775
    @ $243.29 · 2025-01-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PGR
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(67/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    PGR
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView PGR Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs PGR

    Is Alphabet Inc. or The Progressive Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, PGR trades at a 19.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $288 vs. price $231), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or The Progressive Corporation?▼

    PGR scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Progressive Corporation in financial distress?▼

    PGR's Altman Z-Score of 1.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or The Progressive Corporation?▼

    PGR earns 24.2% ROIC versus GOOGL's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or The Progressive Corporation's?▼

    PGR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). PGR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.