SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › DE vs DIS

Deere & Company (DE) vs The Walt Disney Company (DIS)

DE
Deere & Company
$567.58
VS
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
$99.20

Rewards

DE
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 52.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Dividend yield of 1.14% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
DIS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 111.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.96 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 2 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

DE
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 32.0x is 80% above the historical average of 17.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠High leverage (2.40x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
DIS
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DE
DIS
Valuation
$4.20B
Free Cash Flow
$10.08B
2.74%
FCF Yield
5.73%
32.05
Trailing P/E
14.61
24.54
Forward P/E
13.48
Quality & Moat
3.82%
ROIC
7.23%
19.07%
ROE
10.88%
26.25%
Gross Margin
37.28%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
2.40
Debt / Equity
0.41
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.74
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.12
1.14%
Dividend Yield
1.51%
DE: 1Ties: 1DIS: 9
DEDIS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

DIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DE
$-0.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$17.54B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DIS
$2.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$16.56B
Δ Market Cap
+$49.03B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DE
46.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $567.58
Fair Value: $1054.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DIS
36.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 36.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $99.20
Fair Value: $155.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $568?

+17.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.3%

The market implies +17.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +20.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

DIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $99?

+5.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +5.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DE
50/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DIS
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DE
-2.52
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DIS
-2.61
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DE
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 83.1%Retail & Other 16.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,146
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 77.3%Retail & Other 22.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,061
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DIS
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.11M
CHANG AMY L
Director
$98,791
@ $107.85 · 2026-02-12
GORMAN JAMES P
Director
$2.01M
@ $111.89 · 2025-12-12
MCDONALD CALVIN
Director
$999,994
@ $85.06 · 2024-08-08
GORMAN JAMES P
Director
$2.12M
@ $106.03 · 2024-05-08
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DE
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $32.47M
REED CORY J.
Officer
$6.12M
@ $510.00 · 2026-01-14
MAY JOHN C. II
Chief Executive Officer
$20.80M
@ $501.49 · 2026-01-08
MAY JOHN C. II
Chief Executive Officer
$5.55M
@ $500.08 · 2025-11-25
KALATHUR RAJESH
Chief Technology Officer
$12.30M
@ $500.61 · 2025-02-18
REED CORY J.
Officer
$5.05M
@ $377.63 · 2024-06-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DIS
2
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $903,602
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$281,922
@ $114.00 · 2026-01-22
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$277,134
@ $114.00 · 2025-12-24
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$233,701
@ $118.57 · 2025-08-25
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$110,845
@ $110.84 · 2025-05-13
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$74,936
@ $108.76 · 2025-01-22
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$342,766
@ $111.36 · 2024-12-17
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$917,920
@ $114.74 · 2024-12-11
IGER ROBERT A
Chief Executive Officer
$42.67M
@ $114.57 · 2024-11-22
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$568,101
@ $113.62 · 2024-11-20
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$279,772
@ $99.99 · 2024-11-11
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$466,400
@ $106.00 · 2024-05-09
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$226,405
@ $121.92 · 2024-04-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DIS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
DIS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
View DE Full AnalysisView DIS Full Analysis
Deere & Company (DE) vs The Walt Disney Company (DIS) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io