Compare StocksCOP vs ORCL

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, COP is fairly valued at $120, with a DCF intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -7%. ORCL is undervalued at $130, with an intrinsic value of $404 and a margin of safety of 68%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

COP
ConocoPhillips
$120.48
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$129.87

Rewards

COP
    ORCL
    • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    ORCL
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • High leverage (3.15x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    COP
    ORCL
    Valuation
    $7.24B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-24.54B
    4.93%
    FCF Yield
    -6.56%
    20.42
    Trailing P/E
    22.28
    13.38
    Forward P/E
    11.93
    Quality & Moat
    11.77%
    ROIC
    9.15%
    11.28%
    ROE
    53.38%
    45.59%
    Gross Margin
    65.82%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    0.73
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.26
    Net Debt / Equity
    3.15
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.73
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.44
    2.79%
    Dividend Yield
    1.54%
    COP: 7Ties: 1ORCL: 4
    COPORCL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    ORCL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ORCL
    $3.51
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $25.08B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$87.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    COP
    39.4% Overvalued
    Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $120.48
    Fair Value: $86.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ORCL
    67.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 67.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $129.87
    Fair Value: $403.51
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $120?

    +8.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.4%

    The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    ORCL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    COP
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ORCL
    67/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ORCL
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,062
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ORCL
    Insiders 40.5%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 15.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,502
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,000
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ORCL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
    Director
    $112,258
    @ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
    MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
    Director
    $947,913
    @ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $127.52M
    MULLIGAN SHARMILA
    Director
    $234,906
    @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $888,651
    @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.49M
    @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    HRAP HEATHER GRACE
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $6.00M
    @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ORCL
    1
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $126.77M
    HENLEY JEFFREY O
    Officer and Director
    $63.66M
    @ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
    LEVEY STUART A
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
    KEHRING DOUGLAS A
    Officer
    $6.82M
    @ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
    HURA MARK
    Officer
    $2.95M
    @ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $437,064
    @ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.07M
    @ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
    LEVEY STUART A
    Officer
    $5.93M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $641,958
    @ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $10.87M
    @ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $5.12M
    @ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    President
    $6.31M
    @ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $4.04M
    @ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $770,656
    @ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $267.24M
    @ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $794.64M
    @ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $764.01M
    @ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $1.74M
    @ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $428,562
    @ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $291,620
    @ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $705.46M
    @ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    COP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ORCL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    ORCL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    View COP Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: COP vs ORCL

    Is ConocoPhillips or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 67.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $404 vs. price $130), compared to COP's -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $120).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, ConocoPhillips or Oracle Corporation?

    ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

    ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COP scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, ConocoPhillips or Oracle Corporation?

    ConocoPhillips (COP) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -6.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ConocoPhillips or Oracle Corporation?

    COP earns 11.8% ROIC versus ORCL's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, ConocoPhillips's or Oracle Corporation's?

    ORCL's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to COP's 78/100 (Safe). ORCL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.