Compare StocksCOP vs MA

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, COP is fairly valued at $120, with a DCF intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -7%. MA is fairly valued at $573, with an intrinsic value of $558 and a margin of safety of -3%. Of the two, MA has the wider margin of safety.

COP
ConocoPhillips
$120.48
VS
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$573.10

Rewards

COP
    MA
    • Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    MA
    • High leverage (2.33x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • 5 insider sales totaling $22.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    COP
    MA
    Valuation
    $7.24B
    Free Cash Flow
    $16.96B
    4.93%
    FCF Yield
    3.38%
    20.42
    Trailing P/E
    31.54
    13.38
    Forward P/E
    24.96
    Quality & Moat
    11.77%
    ROIC
    55.99%
    11.28%
    ROE
    241.20%
    45.59%
    Gross Margin
    100.00%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    1.76
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.26
    Net Debt / Equity
    2.33
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.73
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.59
    2.79%
    Dividend Yield
    0.61%
    COP: 6Ties: 1MA: 5
    COPMA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MA
    $5.62
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $31.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$177.96B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    COP
    39.4% Overvalued
    Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $120.48
    Fair Value: $86.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MA
    2.7% Overvalued
    Price is 2.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $573.10
    Fair Value: $557.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $120?

    +8.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.4%

    The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    MA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $573?

    +15.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.4%

    The market implies +15.1% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +13.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    COP
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MA
    99/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MA
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,062
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MA
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.5%Retail & Other 8.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,764
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,000
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $127.52M
    MULLIGAN SHARMILA
    Director
    $234,906
    @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $888,651
    @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.49M
    @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
    HRAP HEATHER GRACE
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $6.00M
    @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MA
    5
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $53.72M
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $10.59M
    @ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $185,760
    @ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $216,000
    @ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $3.58M
    @ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $7.49M
    @ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $4.48M
    @ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.20M
    @ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $2.69M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.46M
    @ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
    GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
    Director
    $178,049
    @ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $536,480
    @ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $601,447
    @ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
    GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
    Director
    $173,910
    @ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $536,480
    @ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $508,474
    @ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $5.02M
    @ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $549,373
    @ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $5.55M
    @ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $8.22M
    @ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $218,223
    @ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $257,535
    @ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.68M
    @ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $3.81M
    @ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $6.12M
    @ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.78M
    @ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $6.19M
    @ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $6.18M
    @ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $7.97M
    @ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.17M
    @ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.36M
    @ $500.44 · 2024-11-01
    MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $491.03 · 2024-09-27
    MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
    Officer
    $2.29M
    @ $489.86 · 2024-09-20
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $550,000
    @ $500.00 · 2024-09-17
    MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
    Officer
    $2.31M
    @ $493.10 · 2024-09-13
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $528,000
    @ $480.00 · 2024-08-29
    MASTERCARD FOUNDATION ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $42.19M
    @ $468.80 · 2024-08-22
    MASTERCARD FOUNDATION ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $42.03M
    @ $467.02 · 2024-08-21
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.16M
    @ $470.00 · 2024-08-16
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $470.00 · 2024-08-16
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.11M
    @ $455.00 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    COP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MA
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(67/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    MA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
    View COP Full AnalysisView MA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: COP vs MA

    Is ConocoPhillips or Mastercard Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MA trades at a -2.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $558 vs. price $573), compared to COP's -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $120).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, ConocoPhillips or Mastercard Incorporated?

    MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is ConocoPhillips in financial distress?

    COP's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MA scores 10.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, ConocoPhillips or Mastercard Incorporated?

    ConocoPhillips (COP) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Mastercard Incorporated's 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ConocoPhillips or Mastercard Incorporated?

    MA earns 56.0% ROIC versus COP's 11.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, ConocoPhillips's or Mastercard Incorporated's?

    MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to COP's 78/100 (Safe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    COP vs MA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io