Compare StocksCOP vs EOG

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG)

COP
ConocoPhillips
$126.02
VS
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
$138.82

Rewards

COP
  • ConocoPhillips has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
EOG
  • EOG Resources, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 62.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

COP
  • Trailing P/E of 19.8x is 64% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $14.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 26.4% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
EOG
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 48% above the historical average of 10.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
COP
EOG
Valuation
$7.49B
Free Cash Flow
$3.45B
4.86%
FCF Yield
4.58%
19.81
Trailing P/E
15.22
18.53
Forward P/E
12.26
Quality & Moat
8.73%
ROIC
7.78%
12.39%
ROE
16.69%
46.18%
Gross Margin
62.02%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.38
Debt / Equity
0.31
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.72
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.49
2.72%
Dividend Yield
2.97%
COP: 3Ties: 1EOG: 7
COPEOG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
COP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

EOG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
COP
$-1.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.97B
Δ Market Cap
$-29.73B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EOG
$-1.73
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$11.34B
Δ Market Cap
$-19.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
COP
60.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 60.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $126.02
Fair Value: $317.70
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EOG
11.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $138.82
Fair Value: $157.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
COP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $126?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

EOG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $139?

+9.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
COP
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EOG
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
COP
-2.89
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EOG
-3.06
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
COP
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.9%Retail & Other 15.0%
No. of Institutional Holders2,909
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EOG
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 95.2%Retail & Other 4.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,001
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
COP
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999,472
MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
Director
$500,000
@ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
JOHNSON KIRK L
Officer
$499,472
@ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
MURTI ARJUN N
Director
$239,675
@ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
WALKER R A
Director
$1.02M
@ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EOG
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $755.00
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$755.00
@ $107.86 · 2025-05-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
COP
7
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $60.91M
HRAP HEATHER G.
Officer
$317,631
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
Officer
$4.13M
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.73M
@ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
Officer
$1.24M
@ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.41M
@ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
Director
$4.75M
@ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$46.32M
@ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
Director
$6.00M
@ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.54M
@ $126.44 · 2024-03-25
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$76.43M
@ $125.91 · 2024-03-25
BULLOCK WILLIAM L JR
Chief Financial Officer
$5.57M
@ $123.32 · 2024-03-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EOG
4
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.69M
JANSSEN ANN D
Chief Financial Officer
$348,814
@ $134.31 · 2026-03-12
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$484,535
@ $128.39 · 2026-03-03
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$250,000
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-19
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,360
@ $105.68 · 2025-12-31
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,662
@ $112.05 · 2025-09-30
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$190,657
@ $119.99 · 2025-08-15
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$472,857
@ $119.65 · 2025-07-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$515,772
@ $127.76 · 2025-04-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$483,560
@ $120.89 · 2024-12-31
CLARK JANET F
Director
$76,867
@ $135.33 · 2024-11-19
DONALDSON MICHAEL P
General Counsel
$1.43M
@ $129.50 · 2024-08-26
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$816,405
@ $125.60 · 2024-08-21
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$505,920
@ $126.48 · 2024-08-09
YACOB EZRA Y
Chief Executive Officer
$611,517
@ $129.31 · 2024-05-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
COP
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EOG
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
COP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
EOG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View COP Full AnalysisView EOG Full Analysis
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io