Compare StocksCOP vs CVX

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Chevron Corporation (CVX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, COP is fairly valued at $120, with a DCF intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -7%. CVX is overvalued at $197, with an intrinsic value of $139 and a margin of safety of -42%. Of the two, COP has the wider margin of safety.

COP
ConocoPhillips
$120.48
VS
CVX
Chevron Corporation
$196.83

Rewards

COP
    CVX
    • PEG ratio of 0.80 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

    Risks

    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    CVX
    • ROIC has declined by 11.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 18.9x is 25% above the historical average of 15.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    COP
    CVX
    Valuation
    $7.24B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    4.93%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    20.42
    Trailing P/E
    18.94
    13.38
    Forward P/E
    15.41
    Quality & Moat
    11.77%
    ROIC
    15.46%
    11.28%
    ROE
    6.49%
    45.59%
    Gross Margin
    44.26%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    0.80
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.26
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.21
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.73
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.79
    2.79%
    Dividend Yield
    3.62%
    COP: 3Ties: 2CVX: 5
    COPCVX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    CVX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    CVX
    $-2.55
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $15.44B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-39.41B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    COP
    39.4% Overvalued
    Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $120.48
    Fair Value: $86.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    CVX
    105.4% Overvalued
    Price is 105.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $196.83
    Fair Value: $95.81
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $120?

    +8.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.4%

    The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    CVX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    COP
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    CVX
    43/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    CVX
    -3.12
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,062
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    CVX
    Insiders 4.7%Institutions 70.3%Retail & Other 25.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,952
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,000
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    CVX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    COP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $127.52M
    MULLIGAN SHARMILA
    Director
    $234,906
    @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $888,651
    @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.49M
    @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
    HRAP HEATHER GRACE
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $6.00M
    @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    CVX
    0
    Sells (3M)
    25
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $216.65M
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $8.57M
    @ $213.30 · 2026-03-30
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $9.07M
    @ $192.12 · 2026-03-06
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $2.19M
    @ $188.58 · 2026-03-02
    NELSON MARK A.
    Officer
    $26.23M
    @ $187.92 · 2026-03-02
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.60M
    @ $187.78 · 2026-03-02
    WIRTH MICHAEL K
    Chief Executive Officer
    $51.62M
    @ $189.35 · 2026-03-02
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $17.54M
    @ $187.67 · 2026-03-02
    GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $186.04 · 2026-02-27
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $268,950
    @ $183.83 · 2026-02-18
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $441,327
    @ $183.28 · 2026-02-18
    BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.25M
    @ $184.21 · 2026-02-13
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $122,144
    @ $183.40 · 2026-02-12
    BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $178.43 · 2026-02-03
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $3.92M
    @ $176.53 · 2026-02-03
    NELSON MARK A.
    Officer
    $7.98M
    @ $174.17 · 2026-02-02
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.62M
    @ $175.01 · 2026-01-30
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $7.26M
    @ $176.40 · 2026-01-30
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $544,000
    @ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $537,600
    @ $168.00 · 2026-01-14
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $1.31M
    @ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.68M
    @ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
    WIRTH MICHAEL K
    Chief Executive Officer
    $52.27M
    @ $162.99 · 2026-01-05
    GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $150.27 · 2025-11-21
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $636,480
    @ $160.00 · 2025-08-29
    GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
    Officer
    $1.42M
    @ $152.50 · 2025-02-07
    WIRTH MICHAEL K
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.36M
    @ $160.13 · 2024-11-14
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    COP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    CVX
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(67/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    CVX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
    View COP Full AnalysisView CVX Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: COP vs CVX

    Is ConocoPhillips or Chevron Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, COP trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $113 vs. price $120), compared to CVX's -41.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $139 vs. $197).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, ConocoPhillips or Chevron Corporation?

    CVX scores 43/100 (Narrow moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is ConocoPhillips in financial distress?

    COP's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CVX scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ConocoPhillips or Chevron Corporation?

    CVX earns 15.5% ROIC versus COP's 11.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, ConocoPhillips's or Chevron Corporation's?

    COP's dividend earns a safety score of 78/100 (Safe), compared to CVX's 30/100 (Unsafe). COP has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    COP vs CVX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io