Compare Stocks › COP vs CVX

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Chevron Corporation (CVX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, COP is overvalued at $154, with a DCF intrinsic value of $116 and a margin of safety of -33%. CVX is overvalued at $236, with an intrinsic value of $148 and a margin of safety of -60%. Of the two, COP has the wider margin of safety.

COP
ConocoPhillips
$154.03
VS
CVX
Chevron Corporation
$235.52

Risks

COP
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
CVX
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 11.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $80.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
COP
CVX
Valuation
$7.69B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
4.16%
FCF Yield
N/A
20.40
Trailing P/E
17.29
14.33
Forward P/E
14.81
Quality & Moat
18.10%
ROIC
13.84%
14.18%
ROE
6.29%
47.57%
Gross Margin
44.40%
1.14
PEG Ratio
1.02
Balance Sheet Safety
0.24
Net Debt / Equity
0.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.58
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.49
2.18%
Dividend Yield
3.02%
COP: 3Ties: 2CVX: 5
COPCVX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
COP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CVX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
COP
$-1.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.97B
Δ Market Cap
$-29.73B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CVX
$-2.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$15.44B
Δ Market Cap
$-39.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
COP
73.4% Overvalued
Price is 73.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $154.03
Fair Value: $88.81
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CVX
127.1% Overvalued
Price is 127.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $235.52
Fair Value: $103.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
COP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $154?

+10.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.3%

The market implies +10.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

CVX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
COP
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CVX
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
COP
-2.89
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CVX
-3.12
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
COP
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.1%Retail & Other 12.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,140
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CVX
Insiders 4.8%Institutions 71.2%Retail & Other 24.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,059
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
COP
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $500,000
MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
Director
$500,000
@ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
JOHNSON KIRK L
Officer
$499,472
@ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
MURTI ARJUN N
Director
$239,675
@ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
WALKER R A
Director
$1.02M
@ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CVX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
COP
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $129.54M
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$2.02M
@ $134.51 · 2026-08-20
MULLIGAN SHARMILA
Director
$234,906
@ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$888,651
@ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$64.49M
@ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
Officer
$4.13M
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
HRAP HEATHER GRACE
Officer
$317,631
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.73M
@ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
Officer
$1.24M
@ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.41M
@ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
Director
$4.75M
@ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$46.32M
@ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CVX
5
Sells (3M)
29
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $296.50M
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$9.77M
@ $226.59 · 2026-10-20
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$3.38M
@ $201.06 · 2026-08-17
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$63.57M
@ $200.46 · 2026-08-14
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$2.74M
@ $194.95 · 2026-08-11
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $187.00 · 2026-08-05
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$8.57M
@ $213.30 · 2026-03-30
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$9.07M
@ $192.12 · 2026-03-06
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$8.60M
@ $187.78 · 2026-03-02
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $188.58 · 2026-03-02
NELSON MARK A.
Officer
$26.23M
@ $187.92 · 2026-03-02
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$51.62M
@ $189.35 · 2026-03-02
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$17.54M
@ $187.67 · 2026-03-02
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.24M
@ $186.04 · 2026-02-27
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$441,327
@ $183.28 · 2026-02-18
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$268,950
@ $183.83 · 2026-02-18
BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
Chief Technology Officer
$2.25M
@ $184.21 · 2026-02-13
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$122,144
@ $183.40 · 2026-02-12
BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.07M
@ $178.43 · 2026-02-03
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$3.92M
@ $176.53 · 2026-02-03
NELSON MARK A.
Officer
$7.98M
@ $174.17 · 2026-02-02
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$5.62M
@ $175.01 · 2026-01-30
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$7.26M
@ $176.40 · 2026-01-30
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$544,000
@ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$537,600
@ $168.00 · 2026-01-14
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$4.68M
@ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$52.27M
@ $162.99 · 2026-01-05
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.40M
@ $150.27 · 2025-11-21
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$636,480
@ $160.00 · 2025-08-29
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.42M
@ $152.50 · 2025-02-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
COP
FearGreed
😏Greed(75/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CVX
FearGreed
😏Greed(75/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
COP
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (75)
CVX
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (75)
View COP Full AnalysisView CVX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: COP vs CVX

Is ConocoPhillips or Chevron Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, COP trades at a -33.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $116 vs. price $154), compared to CVX's -59.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $148 vs. $236).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, ConocoPhillips or Chevron Corporation?▼

CVX scores 43/100 (Narrow moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is ConocoPhillips in financial distress?▼

COP's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CVX scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ConocoPhillips or Chevron Corporation?▼

COP earns 18.1% ROIC versus CVX's 13.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, ConocoPhillips's or Chevron Corporation's?▼

COP's dividend earns a safety score of 78/100 (Safe), compared to CVX's 30/100 (Unsafe). COP has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.