Compare StocksCMCSA vs COP

Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) vs ConocoPhillips (COP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CMCSA is undervalued at $22, with a DCF intrinsic value of $107 and a margin of safety of 79%. COP is fairly valued at $108, with an intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of 5%. Of the two, CMCSA has the wider margin of safety.

CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
$22.43
VS
COP
ConocoPhillips
$107.74

Rewards

CMCSA
  • Gross margin of 70.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 15.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 15% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
COP
  • PEG ratio of 0.94 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

CMCSA
  • PEG ratio of 142.98 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.37 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
COP
  • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CMCSA
COP
Valuation
$19.23B
Free Cash Flow
$7.24B
24.01%
FCF Yield
5.52%
4.40
Trailing P/E
18.26
5.93
Forward P/E
11.72
Quality & Moat
7.10%
ROIC
11.77%
20.92%
ROE
11.28%
70.13%
Gross Margin
45.59%
142.98
PEG Ratio
0.94
Balance Sheet Safety
0.96
Net Debt / Equity
0.26
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.41
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.73
5.82%
Dividend Yield
3.02%
CMCSA: 7Ties: 1COP: 4
CMCSACOP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CMCSA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

COP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CMCSA
$-1.01
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$37.10B
Δ Market Cap
$-37.35B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
COP
$-1.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.97B
Δ Market Cap
$-29.73B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CMCSA
79.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 79.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $22.43
Fair Value: $106.88
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
COP
24.6% Overvalued
Price is 24.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $107.74
Fair Value: $86.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CMCSA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $22?

-5.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -4.0%

The market implies -5.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

COP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $108?

+6.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.0%

The market implies +6.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CMCSA
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
COP
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CMCSA
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
COP
-2.89
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CMCSA
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 93.7%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,738
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
COP
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.6%Retail & Other 12.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,171
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CMCSA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
COP
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $500,000
MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
Director
$500,000
@ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
JOHNSON KIRK L
Officer
$499,472
@ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
MURTI ARJUN N
Director
$239,675
@ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
WALKER R A
Director
$1.02M
@ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CMCSA
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $388,385
ARMSTRONG JASON S
Chief Financial Officer
$142,617
@ $31.73 · 2026-03-05
NAKAHARA ASUKA
Director
$245,768
@ $29.70 · 2026-02-03
ROBERTS BRIAN L
Chief Executive Officer
$20.06M
@ $42.73 · 2024-11-27
BACON KENNETH J
Director
$625,093
@ $43.39 · 2024-11-22
ARMSTRONG JASON S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $44.84 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
COP
3
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $127.52M
MULLIGAN SHARMILA
Director
$234,906
@ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$888,651
@ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$64.49M
@ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
HRAP HEATHER G.
Officer
$317,631
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
Officer
$4.13M
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.73M
@ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
Officer
$1.24M
@ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.41M
@ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
Director
$4.75M
@ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$46.32M
@ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
Director
$6.00M
@ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CMCSA
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
COP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CMCSA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
COP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View CMCSA Full AnalysisView COP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CMCSA vs COP

Is Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CMCSA trades at a 79.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $107 vs. price $22), compared to COP's 4.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $108).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

CMCSA scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Comcast Corporation in financial distress?

CMCSA's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COP scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) generates a 24.0% free cash flow yield, compared to ConocoPhillips's 5.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

COP earns 11.8% ROIC versus CMCSA's 7.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Comcast Corporation's or ConocoPhillips's?

CMCSA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to COP's 78/100 (Safe). CMCSA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.