Compare StocksAMT vs COP

American Tower Corporation (AMT) vs ConocoPhillips (COP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AMT is overvalued at $173, with a DCF intrinsic value of $2 and a margin of safety of -7694%. COP is fairly valued at $120, with an intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, COP has the wider margin of safety.

AMT
American Tower Corporation
$173.36
VS
COP
ConocoPhillips
$120.48

Rewards

AMT
  • Gross margin of 73.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
COP

    Risks

    AMT
    • High leverage (4.22x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.16 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AMT
    COP
    Valuation
    $2.92B
    Free Cash Flow
    $7.24B
    3.61%
    FCF Yield
    4.93%
    27.92
    Trailing P/E
    20.42
    24.76
    Forward P/E
    13.38
    Quality & Moat
    7.11%
    ROIC
    11.77%
    33.91%
    ROE
    11.28%
    73.77%
    Gross Margin
    45.59%
    1.62
    PEG Ratio
    1.02
    Balance Sheet Safety
    4.22
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.26
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.14
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.73
    4.03%
    Dividend Yield
    2.79%
    AMT: 3Ties: 1COP: 8
    AMTCOP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AMT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AMT
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-2.91B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-16.77B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AMT
    7694.4% Overvalued
    Price is 7694.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $173.36
    Fair Value: $2.22
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    COP
    39.4% Overvalued
    Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $120.48
    Fair Value: $86.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AMT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $173?

    +18.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.0%

    The market implies +18.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $120?

    +8.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.4%

    The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AMT
    51/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    COP
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AMT
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AMT
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 96.3%Retail & Other 3.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,361
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,062
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AMT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.49M
    KALATHUR RAJESH
    Director
    $494,936
    @ $185.30 · 2026-03-10
    REILLY EUGENE F
    Director
    $994,110
    @ $178.99 · 2025-10-31
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,000
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AMT
    1
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $22.34M
    DOWLING RUTH T
    General Counsel
    $309,641
    @ $172.89 · 2026-07-29
    DOWLING RUTH T
    Officer
    $173,092
    @ $178.08 · 2026-04-29
    VONDRAN STEVEN OWEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.31M
    @ $188.46 · 2026-03-04
    DOWLING RUTH T
    General Counsel
    $128,564
    @ $188.51 · 2026-03-04
    NOEL EUGENE M
    Chief Operating Officer
    $7.87M
    @ $191.05 · 2026-03-02
    DOWLING RUTH T
    General Counsel
    $122,121
    @ $186.16 · 2026-02-27
    MEYER ROBERT JOSEPH JR
    Officer
    $831,695
    @ $186.73 · 2026-02-27
    SMITH RODNEY M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.60M
    @ $192.09 · 2026-02-17
    FONT JUAN HERNANDEZ
    Officer
    $149,998
    @ $208.33 · 2025-07-31
    GOEL SANJAY
    Officer
    $863,680
    @ $215.92 · 2025-03-17
    MEYER ROBERT JOSEPH JR
    Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $201.67 · 2025-02-27
    REEVE PAMELA D A
    Director
    $1.01M
    @ $202.97 · 2025-02-26
    SMITH RODNEY M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.14M
    @ $189.70 · 2025-02-13
    SMITH RODNEY M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $181.10 · 2025-01-16
    GOEL SANJAY
    Officer
    $1.19M
    @ $238.00 · 2024-09-13
    NOEL EUGENE M
    Officer
    $7.95M
    @ $240.00 · 2024-09-10
    PUECH OLIVIER
    Officer
    $4.37M
    @ $230.00 · 2024-09-03
    PUECH OLIVIER
    Officer
    $2.26M
    @ $226.35 · 2024-08-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    COP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $127.52M
    MULLIGAN SHARMILA
    Director
    $234,906
    @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $888,651
    @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.49M
    @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    HRAP HEATHER GRACE
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $6.00M
    @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AMT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    COP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AMT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    View AMT Full AnalysisView COP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AMT vs COP

    Is American Tower Corporation or ConocoPhillips more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, COP trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $113 vs. price $120), compared to AMT's -7694.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $2 vs. $173).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Tower Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

    AMT scores 51/100 (Narrow moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is American Tower Corporation in financial distress?

    AMT's Altman Z-Score of 1.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COP scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, American Tower Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

    ConocoPhillips (COP) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to American Tower Corporation's 3.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Tower Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

    COP earns 11.8% ROIC versus AMT's 7.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, American Tower Corporation's or ConocoPhillips's?

    COP's dividend earns a safety score of 78/100 (Safe), compared to AMT's 24/100 (Unsafe). COP has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.