Compare StocksCMCSA vs COP

Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) vs ConocoPhillips (COP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CMCSA is undervalued at $24, with a DCF intrinsic value of $78 and a margin of safety of 69%. COP is fairly valued at $120, with an intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, CMCSA has the wider margin of safety.

CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
$23.96
VS
COP
ConocoPhillips
$120.48

Rewards

CMCSA
  • Gross margin of 69.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 15.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 15% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
COP

    Risks

    CMCSA
    • PEG ratio of 142.98 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.37 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    COP
    Valuation
    $19.23B
    Free Cash Flow
    $7.24B
    22.62%
    FCF Yield
    4.93%
    7.68
    Trailing P/E
    20.42
    6.61
    Forward P/E
    13.38
    Quality & Moat
    9.43%
    ROIC
    11.77%
    11.49%
    ROE
    11.28%
    69.39%
    Gross Margin
    45.59%
    142.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.02
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.92
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.26
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.43
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.73
    5.51%
    Dividend Yield
    2.79%
    CMCSA: 6Ties: 2COP: 4
    CMCSACOP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CMCSA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    $-1.01
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $37.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-37.35B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    69.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 69.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $23.96
    Fair Value: $77.78
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    COP
    39.4% Overvalued
    Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $120.48
    Fair Value: $86.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CMCSA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $24?

    -5.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -3.8%

    The market implies -5.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -3.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $120?

    +8.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.4%

    The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    67/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    COP
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    Insiders 0.7%Institutions 94.2%Retail & Other 5.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,627
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,062
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,000
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    0
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $388,385
    ARMSTRONG JASON S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $142,617
    @ $31.73 · 2026-03-05
    NAKAHARA ASUKA
    Director
    $245,768
    @ $29.70 · 2026-02-03
    ROBERTS BRIAN L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $20.06M
    @ $42.73 · 2024-11-27
    BACON KENNETH J
    Director
    $625,093
    @ $43.39 · 2024-11-22
    ARMSTRONG JASON S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $44.84 · 2024-11-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    COP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $127.52M
    MULLIGAN SHARMILA
    Director
    $234,906
    @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $888,651
    @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.49M
    @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
    HRAP HEATHER GRACE
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $6.00M
    @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    COP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CMCSA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    View CMCSA Full AnalysisView COP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CMCSA vs COP

    Is Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CMCSA trades at a 69.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $78 vs. price $24), compared to COP's -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $120).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

    CMCSA scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Comcast Corporation in financial distress?

    CMCSA's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COP scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

    Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) generates a 22.6% free cash flow yield, compared to ConocoPhillips's 4.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Comcast Corporation or ConocoPhillips?

    COP earns 11.8% ROIC versus CMCSA's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Comcast Corporation's or ConocoPhillips's?

    CMCSA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to COP's 78/100 (Safe). CMCSA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.