Compare StocksBAC vs PSX

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Phillips 66 (PSX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. PSX is overvalued at $270, with an intrinsic value of $196 and a margin of safety of -38%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.15
VS
PSX
Phillips 66
$270.07

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PSX
  • Share count has been reduced by 14% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PSX
  • ROIC has declined by 10.2 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 13.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.4x is 29% above the historical average of 11.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
PSX
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.55B
N/A
FCF Yield
4.20%
13.43
Trailing P/E
15.41
10.99
Forward P/E
10.99
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
19.25%
11.20%
ROE
23.45%
0.00%
Gross Margin
13.10%
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.23
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.50
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.66
2.21%
Dividend Yield
1.92%
BAC: 3Ties: 2PSX: 3
BACPSX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PSX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PSX
$0.42
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.15
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PSX
62.8% Overvalued
Price is 62.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $270.07
Fair Value: $165.92
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PSX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $270?

+9.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.0%

The market implies +9.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PSX
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PSX
-2.79
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PSX
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 80.5%Retail & Other 19.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,574
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PSX
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $121,214
MEYERS KEVIN OMAR
Director
$30,297
@ $173.13 · 2026-05-06
MEYERS KEVIN OMAR
Director
$30,297
@ $173.13 · 2026-05-06
MEYERS KEVIN OMAR
Director
$30,310
@ $173.20 · 2026-03-17
MEYERS KEVIN OMAR
Director
$30,310
@ $173.20 · 2026-03-17
HAYES GREGORY J
Director
$1.00M
@ $119.90 · 2025-08-14
CORNELIUS SIGMUND L
Director
$61,775
@ $123.55 · 2025-07-31
HEIM MICHAEL A
Director
$125,970
@ $125.97 · 2025-07-30
PEASE ROBERT W.
Director
$49,980
@ $113.85 · 2025-05-22
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PSX
6
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $58.23M
HARBISON RICHARD G
Officer
$11.66M
@ $223.76 · 2026-08-12
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$7.16M
@ $214.90 · 2026-08-11
KLUPPEL ANN M.
Officer
$1.65M
@ $210.78 · 2026-08-10
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$854,400
@ $209.10 · 2026-07-21
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$743,523
@ $211.05 · 2026-07-21
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.09M
@ $190.03 · 2026-07-09
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$5.10M
@ $170.04 · 2026-05-11
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.97M
@ $190.07 · 2026-03-30
DAVIS LISA ANN
Director
$662,617
@ $174.37 · 2026-03-13
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$7.26M
@ $169.53 · 2026-03-12
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$3.65M
@ $167.50 · 2026-03-05
BALDRIDGE DONALD A
Officer
$1.20M
@ $160.00 · 2026-02-17
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$659,100
@ $150.00 · 2026-02-04
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$637,130
@ $145.00 · 2026-01-09
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$3.57M
@ $140.04 · 2025-12-01
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$3.61M
@ $137.68 · 2025-11-18
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$4.14M
@ $138.00 · 2025-11-07
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$615,020
@ $140.00 · 2025-09-26
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$593,055
@ $135.00 · 2025-09-09
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$571,090
@ $130.00 · 2025-07-08
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$1.23M
@ $125.00 · 2025-06-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PSX
FearGreed
😏Greed(75/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
PSX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (75)
View BAC Full AnalysisView PSX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs PSX

Is Bank of America Corporation or Phillips 66 more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to PSX's -37.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $196 vs. $270).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Phillips 66?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PSX scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PSX scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Phillips 66?

PSX earns 19.2% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Phillips 66's?

PSX's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). PSX has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs PSX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io