Compare StocksBA vs XOM

The Boeing Company (BA) vs ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-05, BA is overvalued at $237, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -33%. XOM is undervalued at $154, with an intrinsic value of $459379071521 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, XOM has the wider margin of safety.

BA
The Boeing Company
$237.16
VS
XOM
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
$153.96

Risks

BA
  • Gross margin of 4.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
XOM
  • ROIC has declined by 12.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Trailing P/E of 26.0x is 103% above the historical average of 12.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BA
XOM
Valuation
$5.63B
Free Cash Flow
$20.67B
3.00%
FCF Yield
N/A
84.10
Trailing P/E
26.01
56.41
Forward P/E
14.58
Quality & Moat
0.01%
ROIC
14.66%
173.54%
ROE
12.58%
4.71%
Gross Margin
29.77%
25.04
PEG Ratio
1.31
Balance Sheet Safety
4.75
Net Debt / Equity
0.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.47
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.66%
BA: 1Ties: 1XOM: 8
BAXOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

XOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BA
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-12.13B
Δ Market Cap
+$56.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
XOM
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$49.66B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.04
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BA
33.2% Overvalued
Price is 33.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $237.16
Fair Value: $178.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
XOM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $153.96
Fair Value: $459379071520.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $237?

+29.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.6%
XOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $154?

-30.0%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BA
23/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
XOM
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BA

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

XOM
-2.74
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,103
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
XOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 68.5%Retail & Other 31.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,321
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BA
1
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.40M
TILDEN BRADLEY DOUGLAS
Director
$299,345
@ $218.50 · 2026-05-20
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$499,966
@ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
DEASY DANA S
Officer
$99,102
@ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$497,420
@ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
XOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BA
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.12M
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$351,484
@ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
SCHMIDT ANN M
Officer
$1.53M
@ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
MCKENZIE HOWARD E
Officer
$2.46M
@ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$644,598
@ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$270,009
@ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$867,069
@ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
NELSON BRENDAN J.
President
$132,019
@ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
Officer
$650,198
@ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
CLEARY MICHAEL J
Officer
$558,009
@ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$729,164
@ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
POPE STEPHANIE F
Officer
$3.08M
@ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
CLEARY MICHAEL J
Officer
$368,018
@ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
CLEARY MICHAEL J
Officer
$268,530
@ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$570,759
@ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
XOM
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BA
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
XOM
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
XOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View BA Full AnalysisView XOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BA vs XOM

Is The Boeing Company or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, XOM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $459379071521 vs. price $154), compared to BA's -33.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $237).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Boeing Company or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

XOM scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while BA scores 23/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Boeing Company in financial distress?

BA's Altman Z-Score of 1.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. XOM scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Boeing Company or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation?

XOM earns 14.7% ROIC versus BA's 0.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Boeing Company's or ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's?

BA's dividend earns a safety score of 70/100 (Safe), compared to XOM's 69/100 (Safe). BA has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.