Compare StocksBA vs COP

The Boeing Company (BA) vs ConocoPhillips (COP)

BA
The Boeing Company
$201.18
VS
COP
ConocoPhillips
$126.02

Rewards

BA
    COP
    • ConocoPhillips has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.

    Risks

    BA
    • Gross margin of 4.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    COP
    • Trailing P/E of 19.8x is 65% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • 7 insider sales totaling $14.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 26.4% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BA
    COP
    Valuation
    $1.76B
    Free Cash Flow
    $7.49B
    1.11%
    FCF Yield
    4.86%
    81.45
    Trailing P/E
    19.85
    42.77
    Forward P/E
    18.53
    Quality & Moat
    -3.63%
    ROIC
    8.73%
    34.63%
    ROE
    12.39%
    4.83%
    Gross Margin
    46.18%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    10.33
    Debt / Equity
    0.38
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.72
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.67%
    BA: 1Ties: 1COP: 7
    BACOP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BA
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-12.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$56.54B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BA
    17.3% Overvalued
    Price is 17.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $201.18
    Fair Value: $171.52
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    COP
    60.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 60.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $126.02
    Fair Value: $317.70
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $201?

    +27.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +30.7%
    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $126?

    +8.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.6%

    The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BA
    23/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    COP
    46/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BA
    -3.01
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BA
    Insiders 0.0%Institutions 73.9%Retail & Other 26.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,009
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.9%Retail & Other 15.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,909
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    1
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.10M
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $499,966
    @ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
    DEASY DANA S
    Officer
    $99,102
    @ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $497,420
    @ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $999,472
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    4
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $11.64M
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $351,484
    @ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
    SCHMIDT ANN M
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
    MCKENZIE HOWARD E
    Officer
    $2.46M
    @ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $644,598
    @ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $270,009
    @ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $867,069
    @ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
    NELSON BRENDAN J.
    President
    $132,019
    @ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
    SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
    Officer
    $650,198
    @ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $558,009
    @ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $729,164
    @ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
    POPE STEPHANIE F
    Officer
    $3.08M
    @ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $368,018
    @ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $268,530
    @ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $570,759
    @ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    COP
    7
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $60.91M
    HRAP HEATHER G.
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $6.00M
    @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $126.44 · 2024-03-25
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $76.43M
    @ $125.91 · 2024-03-25
    BULLOCK WILLIAM L JR
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.57M
    @ $123.32 · 2024-03-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(46/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    COP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    View BA Full AnalysisView COP Full Analysis
    The Boeing Company (BA) vs ConocoPhillips (COP) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io