Compare StocksBA vs COP

The Boeing Company (BA) vs ConocoPhillips (COP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BA is overvalued at $216, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -21%. COP is fairly valued at $120, with an intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, COP has the wider margin of safety.

BA
The Boeing Company
$216.14
VS
COP
ConocoPhillips
$120.48

Risks

BA
  • Gross margin of 4.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
COP
  • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BA
COP
Valuation
$5.63B
Free Cash Flow
$7.24B
3.29%
FCF Yield
4.93%
77.47
Trailing P/E
20.42
52.21
Forward P/E
13.38
Quality & Moat
0.01%
ROIC
11.77%
173.54%
ROE
11.28%
4.71%
Gross Margin
45.59%
25.04
PEG Ratio
1.02
Balance Sheet Safety
4.75
Net Debt / Equity
0.26
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.73
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.79%
BA: 1Ties: 1COP: 9
BACOP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

COP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BA
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-12.13B
Δ Market Cap
+$56.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
COP
$-1.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.97B
Δ Market Cap
$-29.73B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BA
21.4% Overvalued
Price is 21.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $216.14
Fair Value: $178.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
COP
39.4% Overvalued
Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $120.48
Fair Value: $86.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $216?

+28.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.5%
COP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $120?

+8.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.4%

The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BA
23/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
COP
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BA

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

COP
-2.89
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.3%Retail & Other 24.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,098
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
COP
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,062
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BA
1
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.40M
TILDEN BRADLEY DOUGLAS
Director
$299,345
@ $218.50 · 2026-05-20
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$499,966
@ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
DEASY DANA S
Officer
$99,102
@ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$497,420
@ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
COP
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $500,000
MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
Director
$500,000
@ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
JOHNSON KIRK L
Officer
$499,472
@ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
MURTI ARJUN N
Director
$239,675
@ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
WALKER R A
Director
$1.02M
@ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BA
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.12M
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$351,484
@ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
SCHMIDT ANN M
Officer
$1.53M
@ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
MCKENZIE HOWARD E
Officer
$2.46M
@ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$644,598
@ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$270,009
@ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$867,069
@ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
NELSON BRENDAN J.
President
$132,019
@ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
Officer
$650,198
@ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
CLEARY MICHAEL J
Officer
$558,009
@ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$729,164
@ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
POPE STEPHANIE F
Officer
$3.08M
@ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
CLEARY MICHAEL J
Officer
$368,018
@ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
CLEARY MICHAEL J
Officer
$268,530
@ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
AMULURU UMA M
Officer
$570,759
@ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
COP
1
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $127.52M
MULLIGAN SHARMILA
Director
$234,906
@ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$888,651
@ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$64.49M
@ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
Officer
$4.13M
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
HRAP HEATHER GRACE
Officer
$317,631
@ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.73M
@ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
Officer
$1.24M
@ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
OLDS NICHOLAS G
Officer
$1.41M
@ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
Director
$4.75M
@ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$46.32M
@ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
Director
$6.00M
@ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
COP
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
COP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View BA Full AnalysisView COP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BA vs COP

Is The Boeing Company or ConocoPhillips more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, COP trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $113 vs. price $120), compared to BA's -21.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $216).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Boeing Company or ConocoPhillips?

COP scores 38/100 (None moat), while BA scores 23/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Boeing Company in financial distress?

BA's Altman Z-Score of 1.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COP scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, The Boeing Company or ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips (COP) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to The Boeing Company's 3.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Boeing Company or ConocoPhillips?

COP earns 11.8% ROIC versus BA's 0.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Boeing Company's or ConocoPhillips's?

COP's dividend earns a safety score of 78/100 (Safe), compared to BA's 70/100 (Safe). COP has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

BA vs COP: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io