Compare StocksADBE vs COP

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs ConocoPhillips (COP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ADBE is undervalued at $250, with a DCF intrinsic value of $554 and a margin of safety of 55%. COP is fairly valued at $120, with an intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, ADBE has the wider margin of safety.

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$250.41
VS
COP
ConocoPhillips
$120.48

Rewards

ADBE
  • Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 89.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
COP

    Risks

    ADBE
      COP
      • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
      • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
      • Trailing P/E of 20.4x is 69% above the historical average of 12.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      COP
      Valuation
      $9.22B
      Free Cash Flow
      $7.24B
      9.26%
      FCF Yield
      4.93%
      14.33
      Trailing P/E
      20.42
      9.11
      Forward P/E
      13.38
      Quality & Moat
      37.82%
      ROIC
      11.77%
      62.95%
      ROE
      11.28%
      89.40%
      Gross Margin
      45.59%
      0.68
      PEG Ratio
      1.02
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.13
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.26
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.15
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.73
      0.00%
      Dividend Yield
      2.79%
      ADBE: 10Ties: 1COP: 1
      ADBECOP

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      ADBE

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      COP

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      $-0.60
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $18.12B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-10.93B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      COP
      $-1.99
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $14.97B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-29.73B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      54.8% Margin of Safety
      Price is 54.8% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $250.41
      Fair Value: $553.74
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      COP
      39.4% Overvalued
      Price is 39.4% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $120.48
      Fair Value: $86.45
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      ADBE

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

      +1.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -0.6%

      The market implies +1.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      COP

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $120?

      +8.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +9.4%

      The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      100/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      COP
      38/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      -2.85
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      COP
      -2.89
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 87.8%Retail & Other 12.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,051
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      COP
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,062
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      1
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.95M
      RICKS DAVID A
      Director
      $1.95M
      @ $194.51 · 2026-06-25
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $507,758
      @ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
      RICKS DAVID A
      Director
      $998,946
      @ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      COP
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $500,000
      MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
      Director
      $500,000
      @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
      JOHNSON KIRK L
      Officer
      $499,472
      @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
      MURTI ARJUN N
      Director
      $239,675
      @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
      WALKER R A
      Director
      $1.02M
      @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      0
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.05M
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $185,915
      @ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $331,355
      @ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $485,323
      @ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $50,344
      @ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $175,828
      @ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $145,567
      @ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
      BELSKY SCOTT K
      Officer
      $2.05M
      @ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
      BANSE AMY L
      Director
      $333,300
      @ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $327,987
      @ $485.19 · 2024-10-29
      BELSKY SCOTT K
      Officer
      $232,525
      @ $483.42 · 2024-10-25
      BELSKY SCOTT K
      Officer
      $1.14M
      @ $511.48 · 2024-10-16
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $3.35M
      @ $515.44 · 2024-09-17
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      COP
      1
      Sells (3M)
      12
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $127.52M
      MULLIGAN SHARMILA
      Director
      $234,906
      @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
      ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
      General Counsel
      $1.00M
      @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
      OLDS NICHOLAS G
      Officer
      $888,651
      @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
      LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $64.49M
      @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
      LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
      Officer
      $4.13M
      @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
      HRAP HEATHER GRACE
      Officer
      $317,631
      @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
      OLDS NICHOLAS G
      Officer
      $1.73M
      @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
      HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
      Officer
      $1.24M
      @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
      OLDS NICHOLAS G
      Officer
      $1.41M
      @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
      ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
      General Counsel
      $1.00M
      @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
      LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
      Director
      $4.75M
      @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
      LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $46.32M
      @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
      LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
      Director
      $6.00M
      @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(39/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      COP
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(61/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
      COP
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
      View ADBE Full AnalysisView COP Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: ADBE vs COP

      Is Adobe Inc. or ConocoPhillips more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADBE trades at a 54.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $554 vs. price $250), compared to COP's -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $120).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Adobe Inc. or ConocoPhillips?

      ADBE scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is ConocoPhillips in financial distress?

      COP's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ADBE scores 8.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Adobe Inc. or ConocoPhillips?

      Adobe Inc. (ADBE) generates a 9.3% free cash flow yield, compared to ConocoPhillips's 4.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Adobe Inc. or ConocoPhillips?

      ADBE earns 37.8% ROIC versus COP's 11.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.