Compare StocksABT vs COP

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs ConocoPhillips (COP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ABT is fairly valued at $88, with a DCF intrinsic value of $93 and a margin of safety of 5%. COP is fairly valued at $108, with an intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of 5%. Of the two, ABT has the wider margin of safety.

ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$88.41
VS
COP
ConocoPhillips
$107.74

Rewards

ABT
  • Abbott Laboratories scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Insiders have bought $1.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
  • Altman Z-Score of 5.60 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
COP
  • PEG ratio of 0.94 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ABT
    COP
    • ROIC has declined by 17.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ABT
    COP
    Valuation
    $6.34B
    Free Cash Flow
    $7.24B
    4.12%
    FCF Yield
    5.52%
    24.76
    Trailing P/E
    18.26
    14.59
    Forward P/E
    11.72
    Quality & Moat
    5.53%
    ROIC
    11.77%
    12.33%
    ROE
    11.28%
    56.50%
    Gross Margin
    45.59%
    1.34
    PEG Ratio
    0.94
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.51
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.26
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.29
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.73
    2.76%
    Dividend Yield
    3.02%
    ABT: 2Ties: 1COP: 9
    ABTCOP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ABT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    COP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ABT
    $1.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $14.14B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$26.79B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    COP
    $-1.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-29.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ABT
    4.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 4.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $88.41
    Fair Value: $92.91
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    COP
    24.6% Overvalued
    Price is 24.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $107.74
    Fair Value: $86.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ABT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $88?

    +10.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.5%

    The market implies +10.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    COP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $108?

    +6.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.0%

    The market implies +6.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ABT
    86/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    COP
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ABT
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    COP
    -2.89
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ABT
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 82.7%Retail & Other 16.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,953
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    COP
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.6%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,171
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    2
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.23M
    STARKS DANIEL J
    Director
    $926,537
    @ $92.65 · 2026-04-27
    BOUDREAU PHILIP P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $201,300
    @ $91.50 · 2026-04-23
    STARKS DANIEL J
    Director
    $1.09M
    @ $108.73 · 2026-02-04
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $107.13 · 2026-01-23
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    COP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,000
    MCRAVEN WILLIAM H.
    Director
    $500,000
    @ $86.69 · 2025-11-10
    JOHNSON KIRK L
    Officer
    $499,472
    @ $94.24 · 2025-06-16
    MURTI ARJUN N
    Director
    $239,675
    @ $95.87 · 2024-12-20
    WALKER R A
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $97.80 · 2024-12-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ABT
    0
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.44M
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $102,288
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $67,614
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $132,224
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $81,946
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    CUSHMAN ELIZABETH C
    General Counsel
    $30,398
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $70,851
    @ $115.58 · 2026-03-02
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $203,043
    @ $128.02 · 2025-11-25
    BOUDREAU PHILIP P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $746,758
    @ $134.55 · 2025-08-08
    BLOUNT SALLY E
    Director
    $337,116
    @ $129.66 · 2025-04-30
    EARNHARDT LISA D
    President
    $12.23M
    @ $133.83 · 2025-03-07
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    SHROFF ERIC
    Officer
    $77,652
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MORELAND MARY K
    Officer
    $109,292
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    MORRONE LOUIS H
    Officer
    $153,507
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    WAINER ANDREA F
    Officer
    $131,123
    @ $138.17 · 2025-03-03
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.44M
    @ $131.17 · 2025-02-05
    SALVADORI DANIEL GESUA SIVE
    Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $128.50 · 2025-01-30
    ALLEN HUBERT L.
    Officer
    $24.34M
    @ $128.26 · 2025-01-30
    ALLEN HUBERT L.
    Officer
    $18.42M
    @ $117.04 · 2024-10-21
    FORD ROBERT B.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.49M
    @ $116.41 · 2024-09-12
    MCCOY JOHN A. JR
    Officer
    $3,100
    @ $114.81 · 2024-09-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    COP
    3
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $127.52M
    MULLIGAN SHARMILA
    Director
    $234,906
    @ $119.00 · 2026-06-10
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $130.03 · 2026-03-24
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $888,651
    @ $127.06 · 2026-03-23
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.49M
    @ $127.26 · 2026-03-20
    HRAP HEATHER G.
    Officer
    $317,631
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    LUNDQUIST ANDREW D
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $119.68 · 2026-03-13
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $119.36 · 2026-03-12
    HAYNES-WELSH KONTESSA S.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $120.07 · 2026-03-12
    OLDS NICHOLAS G
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $116.37 · 2026-03-11
    ROSE KELLY BRUNETTI
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-03-09
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $4.75M
    @ $118.79 · 2026-03-06
    LANCE RYAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $46.32M
    @ $92.50 · 2025-12-19
    LEACH TIMOTHY ALLEN
    Director
    $6.00M
    @ $108.11 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ABT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    COP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(46/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ABT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    COP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
    View ABT Full AnalysisView COP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ABT vs COP

    Is Abbott Laboratories or ConocoPhillips more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ABT trades at a 4.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $93 vs. price $88), compared to COP's 4.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $108).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Abbott Laboratories or ConocoPhillips?

    ABT scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while COP scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is ConocoPhillips in financial distress?

    COP's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ABT scores 5.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Abbott Laboratories or ConocoPhillips?

    ConocoPhillips (COP) generates a 5.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Abbott Laboratories's 4.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Abbott Laboratories or ConocoPhillips?

    COP earns 11.8% ROIC versus ABT's 5.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Abbott Laboratories's or ConocoPhillips's?

    ABT's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to COP's 78/100 (Safe). ABT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.