Compare StocksABBV vs DD

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ABBV is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $178 and a margin of safety of -41%. DD is undervalued at $137, with an intrinsic value of $11746255941 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, DD has the wider margin of safety.

ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
$250.94
VS
DD
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
$137.00

Rewards

ABBV
  • AbbVie Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 72.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • AbbVie Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
DD

    Risks

    ABBV
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    DD
    • Trailing P/E of 120.2x is 547% above the historical average of 18.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Altman Z-Score of -0.94 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 33.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    DD
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-124.75M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    70.89
    Trailing P/E
    120.18
    15.41
    Forward P/E
    17.39
    Quality & Moat
    27.60%
    ROIC
    4.32%
    N/A
    ROE
    0.90%
    72.79%
    Gross Margin
    35.01%
    0.41
    PEG Ratio
    1.72
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.18
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.06
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.61
    2.76%
    Dividend Yield
    1.75%
    ABBV: 6Ties: 1DD: 1
    ABBVDD

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ABBV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    DD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-19.85B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$118.02B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    DD
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-1.54B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$34.454
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    40.7% Overvalued
    Price is 40.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $250.94
    Fair Value: $178.31
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    DD
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $137.00
    Fair Value: $1586495696.62
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ABBV

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    DD

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    82/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    DD
    32/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    -2.86
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    DD
    -3.17
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,146
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    DD
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 78.4%Retail & Other 21.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,499
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    DD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    DD
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.31M
    HOOVER ERIK THOMAS
    General Counsel
    $238,939
    @ $39.79 · 2025-11-28
    KOCH LORI
    Chief Executive Officer
    $355,574
    @ $39.46 · 2025-11-28
    LARRABEE STEVEN P
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.33M
    @ $77.17 · 2025-09-15
    LARRABEE STEVEN P
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.38M
    @ $76.79 · 2025-09-05
    KEMP JON D
    Officer
    $511,942
    @ $83.92 · 2024-11-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    DD
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(59/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ABBV
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    DD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
    View ABBV Full AnalysisView DD Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ABBV vs DD

    Is AbbVie Inc. or DuPont de Nemours, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, DD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $11746255941 vs. price $137), compared to ABBV's -40.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $178 vs. $251).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, AbbVie Inc. or DuPont de Nemours, Inc.?

    ABBV scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while DD scores 32/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is DuPont de Nemours, Inc. in financial distress?

    DD's Altman Z-Score of -0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ABBV scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AbbVie Inc. or DuPont de Nemours, Inc.?

    ABBV earns 27.6% ROIC versus DD's 4.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, AbbVie Inc.'s or DuPont de Nemours, Inc.'s?

    ABBV's dividend earns a safety score of 39/100 (Unsafe), compared to DD's 35/100 (Unsafe). ABBV has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.