Compare Stocks › V vs YUM

Visa Inc. (V) vs Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, V is overvalued at $414, with a DCF intrinsic value of $328 and a margin of safety of -26%. YUM is overvalued at $155, with an intrinsic value of $78 and a margin of safety of -100%. Of the two, V has the wider margin of safety.

V
Visa Inc.
$413.59
VS
YUM
Yum! Brands, Inc.
$155.40

Rewards

V
  • ★Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
YUM
  • ★Yum! Brands, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Yum! Brands, Inc. scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 12.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

V
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $12.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
YUM
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 4.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠5 insider sales with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
V
YUM
Valuation
$21.12B
Free Cash Flow
$1.64B
2.73%
FCF Yield
3.86%
33.57
Trailing P/E
19.57
24.14
Forward P/E
22.72
Quality & Moat
39.72%
ROIC
16.84%
63.51%
ROE
N/A
97.68%
Gross Margin
45.31%
1.87
PEG Ratio
1.97
Balance Sheet Safety
0.22
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.25
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.15
0.65%
Dividend Yield
1.93%
V: 5Ties: 1YUM: 4
VYUM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

YUM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
V
$5.46
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$242.97B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
YUM
$2.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
V
26.1% Overvalued
Price is 26.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $413.59
Fair Value: $327.99
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
YUM
99.8% Overvalued
Price is 99.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $155.40
Fair Value: $77.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

+16.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.1%

The market implies +16.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

YUM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $155?

+15.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.8%

The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
YUM
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
YUM
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 88.7%Retail & Other 11.2%
No. of Institutional Holders6,002
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
YUM
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 91.0%Retail & Other 8.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,869
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
YUM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
V
5
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $84.17M
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$687,691
@ $368.34 · 2026-09-09
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $379.65 · 2026-09-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$773,378
@ $381.35 · 2026-08-31
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $367.87 · 2026-08-21
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$6.65M
@ $371.00 · 2026-08-21
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$20.90M
@ $364.97 · 2026-07-30
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$729,720
@ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$7.13M
@ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
YUM
5
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.92M
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,931
@ $140.11 · 2026-10-07
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$32,990
@ $136.89 · 2026-10-01
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$40,100
@ $153.64 · 2026-09-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$41,176
@ $153.64 · 2026-09-01
SKEANS TRACY L
Chief Operating Officer
$552,052
@ $158.00 · 2026-08-24
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,972
@ $153.15 · 2026-08-03
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$41,044
@ $153.15 · 2026-08-03
RUSSELL DAVID ERIC
Officer
$1.22M
@ $153.15 · 2026-08-03
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$40,105
@ $160.42 · 2026-07-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$44,436
@ $160.42 · 2026-07-01
POWELL AARON
Officer
$962,680
@ $160.42 · 2026-07-01
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,998
@ $148.14 · 2026-06-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$38,665
@ $148.14 · 2026-06-01
TRESVANT SEAN
Officer
$464,040
@ $154.68 · 2026-05-26
POWELL AARON
Officer
$914,252
@ $152.35 · 2026-05-19
SKEANS TRACY L
Chief Operating Officer
$279,224
@ $152.00 · 2026-05-15
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$40,120
@ $160.48 · 2026-05-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$44,453
@ $160.48 · 2026-05-01
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,624
@ $154.18 · 2026-04-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$41,783
@ $154.18 · 2026-04-01
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,577
@ $166.29 · 2026-03-02
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$47,725
@ $166.29 · 2026-03-02
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$40,177
@ $166.02 · 2026-02-26
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$47,150
@ $166.02 · 2026-02-26
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$265,384
@ $164.63 · 2026-02-13
POWELL AARON
Officer
$1.94M
@ $161.44 · 2026-02-05
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$42,275
@ $153.17 · 2025-12-01
SKEANS TRACY L
Chief Operating Officer
$3.63M
@ $149.10 · 2025-11-17
POWELL AARON
Officer
$419,839
@ $150.48 · 2025-11-11
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$261,162
@ $148.81 · 2025-11-06
BURKHARDT ERIKA
Officer
$189,551
@ $149.37 · 2025-11-05
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$42,116
@ $154.27 · 2025-11-05
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$41,962
@ $152.59 · 2025-10-01
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.07M
@ $149.80 · 2025-09-15
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$39,223
@ $145.27 · 2025-09-02
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $146.84 · 2025-08-15
SKEANS TRACY L
Chief Operating Officer
$1.81M
@ $148.24 · 2025-08-15
GRADDICK-WEIR MIRIAN M
Director
$296,121
@ $145.30 · 2025-08-14
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$36,799
@ $139.92 · 2025-08-06
CORNELL BRIAN C
Director
$291,034
@ $139.92 · 2025-08-06
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $146.60 · 2025-07-15
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$40,332
@ $148.28 · 2025-07-01
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $144.00 · 2025-06-16
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$39,120
@ $145.97 · 2025-06-04
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.03M
@ $145.57 · 2025-05-15
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$753,891
@ $146.70 · 2025-04-15
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$816,392
@ $154.24 · 2025-03-17
BURKHARDT ERIKA
Officer
$94,965
@ $159.07 · 2025-03-06
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$384,480
@ $160.00 · 2025-03-06
RUSSELL DAVID ERIC
Officer
$793,300
@ $158.66 · 2025-03-05
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$4.88M
@ $159.46 · 2025-03-05
RUSSELL DAVID ERIC
Officer
$2.64M
@ $144.63 · 2025-02-10
SKALA JUSTIN PETER
Director
$221,261
@ $145.28 · 2025-02-10
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$522,884
@ $137.06 · 2024-12-16
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$446,130
@ $137.06 · 2024-12-16
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$959,600
@ $135.94 · 2024-11-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
V
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
YUM
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
V
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
YUM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View V Full AnalysisView YUM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: V vs YUM

Is Visa Inc. or Yum! Brands, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, V trades at a -26.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $328 vs. price $414), compared to YUM's -99.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $78 vs. $155).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Visa Inc. or Yum! Brands, Inc.?▼

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while YUM scores 88/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Yum! Brands, Inc. in financial distress?▼

YUM's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. V scores 8.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Visa Inc. or Yum! Brands, Inc.?▼

Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) generates a 3.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Visa Inc.'s 2.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Visa Inc. or Yum! Brands, Inc.?▼

V earns 39.7% ROIC versus YUM's 16.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Visa Inc.'s or Yum! Brands, Inc.'s?▼

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to YUM's 84/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.