Compare StocksV vs WDC

Visa Inc. (V) vs Western Digital Corporation (WDC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, V is overvalued at $370, with a DCF intrinsic value of $316 and a margin of safety of -17%. WDC is undervalued at $419, with an intrinsic value of $1960 and a margin of safety of 79%. Of the two, WDC has the wider margin of safety.

V
Visa Inc.
$369.63
VS
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
$419.42

Rewards

V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
WDC
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $12.03 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.81 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 21.34 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

V
  • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 9 insider sales totaling $44.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
WDC
  • Share count has increased by 12% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
V
WDC
Valuation
$20.40B
Free Cash Flow
$3.51B
2.96%
FCF Yield
2.32%
31.43
Trailing P/E
15.57
24.64
Forward P/E
13.21
Quality & Moat
39.37%
ROIC
44.26%
61.19%
ROE
130.85%
97.72%
Gross Margin
48.85%
1.68
PEG Ratio
0.81
Balance Sheet Safety
0.29
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.32
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.08
0.72%
Dividend Yield
0.14%
V: 4Ties: 1WDC: 7
VWDC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

WDC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
V
$5.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$243.21B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WDC
$13.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$10.13B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
V
16.9% Overvalued
Price is 16.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $369.63
Fair Value: $316.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WDC
78.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 78.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $419.42
Fair Value: $1959.86
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $370?

+15.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

WDC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $419?

+4.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.1%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WDC
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WDC
-0.12
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 90.2%Retail & Other 9.7%
No. of Institutional Holders5,988
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WDC
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 91.9%Retail & Other 7.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,460
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WDC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
V
9
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $87.76M
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$687,691
@ $368.34 · 2026-09-09
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $379.65 · 2026-09-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$773,378
@ $381.35 · 2026-08-31
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$6.65M
@ $371.00 · 2026-08-21
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $367.87 · 2026-08-21
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$20.90M
@ $364.97 · 2026-07-30
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$729,720
@ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$7.13M
@ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WDC
8
Sells (3M)
37
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $62.81M
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$825,472
@ $459.87 · 2026-09-04
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$194,918
@ $451.20 · 2026-09-04
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$696,280
@ $469.51 · 2026-08-27
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$417,339
@ $454.12 · 2026-08-24
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$8.90M
@ $444.97 · 2026-08-11
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.71M
@ $448.66 · 2026-07-28
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$88,852
@ $462.77 · 2026-07-28
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$427,941
@ $529.63 · 2026-07-21
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.68M
@ $511.16 · 2026-06-09
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$385,924
@ $536.01 · 2026-06-09
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$235,699
@ $545.60 · 2026-06-05
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$1.38M
@ $556.24 · 2026-06-01
KIDDOO BRUCE E
Director
$396,390
@ $528.52 · 2026-05-28
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$265,973
@ $509.53 · 2026-05-27
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$48,640
@ $458.87 · 2026-05-21
DAVIS BRIAN SCOTT
Officer
$5.01M
@ $500.69 · 2026-05-11
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.07M
@ $443.19 · 2026-05-04
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$8.24M
@ $411.84 · 2026-05-01
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$136,884
@ $377.09 · 2026-04-21
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.17M
@ $255.32 · 2026-03-06
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$2.50M
@ $268.27 · 2026-03-04
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.74M
@ $270.31 · 2026-03-04
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.63M
@ $271.67 · 2026-03-02
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$61,228
@ $286.11 · 2026-02-26
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$123,662
@ $282.33 · 2026-02-24
DAVIS BRIAN SCOTT
Officer
$2.79M
@ $279.16 · 2026-02-17
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$1.83M
@ $270.49 · 2026-02-06
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$5.11M
@ $255.44 · 2026-02-02
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$102,363
@ $229.00 · 2026-01-21
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$3.72M
@ $163.16 · 2025-12-05
ALEXY KIMBERLY E.
Director
$320,165
@ $160.08 · 2025-12-04
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$449,752
@ $160.57 · 2025-12-02
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$975,696
@ $162.62 · 2025-12-01
OULMAN ROXANNE M
Director
$277,956
@ $154.42 · 2025-11-25
ALEXY KIMBERLY E.
Director
$272,272
@ $154.00 · 2025-11-25
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.61M
@ $161.32 · 2025-11-05
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$3.01M
@ $150.69 · 2025-11-03
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$1.02M
@ $90.29 · 2025-09-04
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$28,558
@ $80.90 · 2025-08-28
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$64,387
@ $79.10 · 2025-08-26
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$1.05M
@ $74.78 · 2025-08-22
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$375,847
@ $75.35 · 2025-08-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
V
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WDC
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
WDC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
View V Full AnalysisView WDC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: V vs WDC

Is Visa Inc. or Western Digital Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, WDC trades at a 78.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1960 vs. price $419), compared to V's -16.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $316 vs. $370).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Visa Inc. or Western Digital Corporation?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while WDC scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Visa Inc. or Western Digital Corporation?

Visa Inc. (V) generates a 3.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Western Digital Corporation's 2.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Visa Inc. or Western Digital Corporation?

WDC earns 44.3% ROIC versus V's 39.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Visa Inc.'s or Western Digital Corporation's?

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to WDC's 88/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Western Digital Corporation have accounting red flags?

WDC's Beneish M-Score of -0.1 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, V scores -2.5, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

V vs WDC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io