Compare Stocks › UNH vs ZBRA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) vs Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, UNH is overvalued at $407, with a DCF intrinsic value of $367 and a margin of safety of -11%. ZBRA is overvalued at $361, with an intrinsic value of $151 and a margin of safety of -139%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$406.97
VS
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
$361.26

Rewards

UNH
  • ★UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
ZBRA
  • ★Zebra Technologies Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 26.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.58 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

UNH
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 20.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
ZBRA
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.6 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
UNH
ZBRA
Valuation
$26.50B
Free Cash Flow
$831.00M
7.25%
FCF Yield
4.86%
23.23
Trailing P/E
33.11
17.48
Forward P/E
16.21
Quality & Moat
11.51%
ROIC
15.35%
15.77%
ROE
15.29%
20.05%
Gross Margin
49.58%
1.03
PEG Ratio
0.58
Balance Sheet Safety
0.43
Net Debt / Equity
0.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.58
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.37
2.28%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
UNH: 6Ties: 2ZBRA: 4
UNHZBRA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ZBRA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ZBRA
$-0.93
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.24B
Δ Market Cap
$-1.15B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
UNH
10.8% Overvalued
Price is 10.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $406.97
Fair Value: $367.30
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ZBRA
139.3% Overvalued
Price is 139.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $361.26
Fair Value: $150.93
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $407?

+14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.2%

The market implies +14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ZBRA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $361?

+16.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.2%

The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ZBRA
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ZBRA
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.6%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,333
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ZBRA
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 106.5%
No. of Institutional Holders977
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ZBRA
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $386,823
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$41,080
@ $205.40 · 2026-03-12
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$112,625
@ $225.25 · 2026-02-27
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$233,118
@ $233.12 · 2025-11-18
GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERS
Director
$1.00M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
UNH
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $944,910
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$455,910
@ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$205,000
@ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ZBRA
2
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.41M
CONNLY LINDA
Director
$188,840
@ $377.68 · 2026-08-10
CHO MICHAEL
Officer
$1.31M
@ $375.20 · 2026-08-07
LUFF LOIZIDES MELISSA
Officer
$126,975
@ $253.95 · 2026-05-26
ROBERTS JANICE M
Director
$748,620
@ $249.54 · 2026-05-14
ARMSTRONG ROBERT JOHN JR
Officer
$2,068
@ $229.78 · 2026-03-05
KOGL CRISTEN L
Officer
$34,178
@ $235.71 · 2026-03-05
CONNLY LINDA
Director
$356,454
@ $322.00 · 2025-08-12
O SULLIVAN COLLEEN M
Officer
$75,979
@ $399.89 · 2024-11-25
CHO MICHAEL
Officer
$119,483
@ $400.95 · 2024-11-12
WHITE JOSEPH RAMSEY
Officer
$623,567
@ $400.75 · 2024-11-08
HUDSON RICHARD EDWARD
Officer
$435,889
@ $394.47 · 2024-11-07
ARMSTRONG ROBERT JOHN JR
Officer
$359,317
@ $393.13 · 2024-11-06
SCHMITZ JEFFREY F
Officer
$266,098
@ $387.33 · 2024-11-06
KOGL CRISTEN L
Officer
$203,580
@ $390.00 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ZBRA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
UNH
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
ZBRA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View UNH Full AnalysisView ZBRA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: UNH vs ZBRA

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zebra Technologies Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -10.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $367 vs. price $407), compared to ZBRA's -139.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $151 vs. $361).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zebra Technologies Corporation?▼

ZBRA scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?▼

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ZBRA scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zebra Technologies Corporation?▼

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 7.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Zebra Technologies Corporation's 4.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zebra Technologies Corporation?▼

ZBRA earns 15.4% ROIC versus UNH's 11.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

UNH vs ZBRA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io