Compare StocksUNH vs ZBH

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, UNH is fairly valued at $375, with a DCF intrinsic value of $389 and a margin of safety of 4%. ZBH is undervalued at $94, with an intrinsic value of $120 and a margin of safety of 21%. Of the two, ZBH has the wider margin of safety.

UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$375.21
VS
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$94.25

Rewards

UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
ZBH
  • Gross margin of 69.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.16 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
ZBH
  • FCF yield of 7.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
UNH
ZBH
Valuation
$24.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.42B
7.21%
FCF Yield
7.90%
24.10
Trailing P/E
22.88
16.59
Forward P/E
10.39
Quality & Moat
14.16%
ROIC
5.97%
14.15%
ROE
6.41%
19.72%
Gross Margin
69.52%
1.02
PEG Ratio
0.61
Balance Sheet Safety
0.40
Net Debt / Equity
0.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.57
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.83
2.47%
Dividend Yield
0.99%
UNH: 6Ties: 1ZBH: 5
UNHZBH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ZBH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ZBH
$-4.43
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.05B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
UNH
3.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 3.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $375.21
Fair Value: $389.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ZBH
21.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $94.25
Fair Value: $119.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $375?

+13.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +13.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ZBH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $94?

+5.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.0%

The market implies +5.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ZBH
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ZBH
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.7%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,387
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ZBH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 111.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,287
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ZBH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
UNH
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $944,910
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$455,910
@ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$205,000
@ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ZBH
2
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.58M
THORNAL KEVIN R
Officer
$528,978
@ $92.95 · 2026-09-11
PHIPPS CHAD F
Officer
$295,050
@ $98.35 · 2026-09-04
YI SANG
Officer
$413,216
@ $82.64 · 2026-05-29
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$250,849
@ $94.66 · 2026-03-12
YI SANG
Officer
$96,490
@ $96.49 · 2026-02-12
YI SANG
Officer
$124,302
@ $103.58 · 2025-09-11
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$156,225
@ $104.15 · 2025-09-08
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$153,735
@ $102.49 · 2025-08-18
YI SANG
Officer
$74,011
@ $92.51 · 2025-06-13
YI SANG
Officer
$95,000
@ $95.00 · 2025-06-11
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$150,649
@ $104.40 · 2025-03-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
UNH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ZBH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
ZBH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View UNH Full AnalysisView ZBH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: UNH vs ZBH

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ZBH trades at a 21.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $120 vs. price $94), compared to UNH's 3.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $389 vs. $375).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while ZBH scores 68/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. in financial distress?

ZBH's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.?

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) generates a 7.9% free cash flow yield, compared to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's 7.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.?

UNH earns 14.2% ROIC versus ZBH's 6.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.'s?

ZBH's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). ZBH has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

UNH vs ZBH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io