Compare StocksUNH vs YUM

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) vs Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, UNH is fairly valued at $401, with a DCF intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. YUM is overvalued at $152, with an intrinsic value of $99 and a margin of safety of -53%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96
VS
YUM
Yum! Brands, Inc.
$151.99

Rewards

UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
YUM
  • Yum! Brands, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Yum! Brands, Inc. scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 12.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
YUM
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • 9 insider sales totaling $1.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
UNH
YUM
Valuation
$17.69B
Free Cash Flow
$1.26B
4.86%
FCF Yield
3.01%
30.17
Trailing P/E
24.51
19.18
Forward P/E
20.30
Quality & Moat
15.60%
ROIC
15.85%
12.18%
ROE
N/A
18.80%
Gross Margin
45.66%
1.41
PEG Ratio
1.95
Balance Sheet Safety
0.44
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.16
2.21%
Dividend Yield
1.90%
UNH: 6Ties: 2YUM: 2
UNHYUM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

YUM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
YUM
$2.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
YUM
53.0% Overvalued
Price is 53.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.99
Fair Value: $99.37
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

YUM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+15.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.2%

The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
YUM
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
YUM
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
YUM
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.7%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,891
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
YUM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
YUM
9
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $14.58M
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,998
@ $148.14 · 2026-06-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$38,665
@ $148.14 · 2026-06-01
TRESVANT SEAN
Officer
$464,040
@ $154.68 · 2026-05-26
POWELL AARON
Officer
$914,252
@ $152.35 · 2026-05-19
SKEANS TRACY L
Chief Operating Officer
$279,224
@ $152.00 · 2026-05-15
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$40,120
@ $160.48 · 2026-05-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$44,453
@ $160.48 · 2026-05-01
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,624
@ $154.18 · 2026-04-01
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$41,783
@ $154.18 · 2026-04-01
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$39,577
@ $166.29 · 2026-03-02
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$47,725
@ $166.29 · 2026-03-02
TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
Chief Executive Officer
$40,177
@ $166.02 · 2026-02-26
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$47,150
@ $166.02 · 2026-02-26
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$265,384
@ $164.63 · 2026-02-13
POWELL AARON
Officer
$1.94M
@ $161.44 · 2026-02-05
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$42,275
@ $153.17 · 2025-12-01
SKEANS TRACY L
Chief Operating Officer
$3.63M
@ $149.10 · 2025-11-17
POWELL AARON
Officer
$419,839
@ $150.48 · 2025-11-11
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$261,162
@ $148.81 · 2025-11-06
BURKHARDT ERIKA
Officer
$189,551
@ $149.37 · 2025-11-05
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$42,116
@ $154.27 · 2025-11-05
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$41,962
@ $152.59 · 2025-10-01
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.07M
@ $149.80 · 2025-09-15
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$39,223
@ $145.27 · 2025-09-02
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $146.84 · 2025-08-15
SKEANS TRACY L
Chief Operating Officer
$1.81M
@ $148.24 · 2025-08-15
GRADDICK-WEIR MIRIAN M
Director
$296,121
@ $145.30 · 2025-08-14
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$36,799
@ $139.92 · 2025-08-06
CORNELL BRIAN C
Director
$291,034
@ $139.92 · 2025-08-06
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $146.60 · 2025-07-15
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$40,332
@ $148.28 · 2025-07-01
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $144.00 · 2025-06-16
MEZVINSKY SCOTT
Officer
$39,120
@ $145.97 · 2025-06-04
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$1.03M
@ $145.57 · 2025-05-15
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$753,891
@ $146.70 · 2025-04-15
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$816,392
@ $154.24 · 2025-03-17
BURKHARDT ERIKA
Officer
$94,965
@ $159.07 · 2025-03-06
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$384,480
@ $160.00 · 2025-03-06
RUSSELL DAVID ERIC
Officer
$793,300
@ $158.66 · 2025-03-05
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$4.88M
@ $159.46 · 2025-03-05
RUSSELL DAVID ERIC
Officer
$2.64M
@ $144.63 · 2025-02-10
SKALA JUSTIN PETER
Director
$221,261
@ $145.28 · 2025-02-10
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$522,884
@ $137.06 · 2024-12-16
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$446,130
@ $137.06 · 2024-12-16
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$959,600
@ $135.94 · 2024-11-15
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$941,682
@ $134.43 · 2024-10-15
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$941,682
@ $134.43 · 2024-09-16
GRADDICK-WEIR MIRIAN M
Director
$179,857
@ $137.40 · 2024-08-19
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$974,956
@ $137.92 · 2024-08-15
CATLETT SCOTT A
Officer
$1.13M
@ $137.79 · 2024-08-13
SAMI SABIR
Officer
$9.75M
@ $137.16 · 2024-08-07
GIBBS DAVID W
Chief Executive Officer
$912,030
@ $131.02 · 2024-07-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
YUM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
YUM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View UNH Full AnalysisView YUM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: UNH vs YUM

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Yum! Brands, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to YUM's -53.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $99 vs. $152).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Yum! Brands, Inc.?

YUM scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Yum! Brands, Inc. in financial distress?

YUM's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Yum! Brands, Inc.?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Yum! Brands, Inc.'s 3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Yum! Brands, Inc.?

YUM earns 15.9% ROIC versus UNH's 15.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's or Yum! Brands, Inc.'s?

YUM's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). YUM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.