Compare StocksUNH vs WSM

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, UNH is fairly valued at $401, with a DCF intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. WSM is overvalued at $227, with an intrinsic value of $203 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96
VS
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$226.92

Rewards

UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
WSM
  • Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Williams-Sonoma, Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
WSM
  • PEG ratio of 2.99 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $16.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
UNH
WSM
Valuation
$17.69B
Free Cash Flow
$885.46M
4.86%
FCF Yield
3.31%
30.17
Trailing P/E
25.41
19.18
Forward P/E
22.12
Quality & Moat
15.60%
ROIC
29.94%
12.18%
ROE
54.01%
18.80%
Gross Margin
46.06%
1.41
PEG Ratio
2.99
Balance Sheet Safety
0.44
Net Debt / Equity
0.45
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.51
2.21%
Dividend Yield
1.24%
UNH: 5Ties: 2WSM: 5
UNHWSM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

WSM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WSM
$5.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.33B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WSM
11.7% Overvalued
Price is 11.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.92
Fair Value: $203.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

WSM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $227?

+10.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.7%

The market implies +10.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WSM
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WSM
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WSM
Insiders 1.1%Institutions 99.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,312
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WSM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WSM
7
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $61.25M
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$106,003
@ $203.07 · 2026-06-08
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $200.00 · 2026-05-27
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$3.45M
@ $172.61 · 2026-05-14
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $200.00 · 2026-04-17
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$267,411
@ $188.45 · 2026-04-08
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$436,366
@ $192.49 · 2026-04-08
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.90M
@ $180.64 · 2026-03-26
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $183.04 · 2026-03-16
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$7.26M
@ $207.39 · 2026-01-15
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$157,358
@ $205.16 · 2026-01-14
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.39M
@ $179.55 · 2025-11-26
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$695,765
@ $198.79 · 2025-09-24
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$626,951
@ $198.84 · 2025-09-18
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$18.02M
@ $200.17 · 2025-09-15
KING DAVID RANDOLPH
General Counsel
$3.56M
@ $203.60 · 2025-09-08
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.05M
@ $168.18 · 2025-07-15
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$675,852
@ $168.96 · 2025-07-01
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$628,448
@ $157.11 · 2025-06-02
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$4.93M
@ $164.33 · 2025-05-29
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$627,134
@ $156.78 · 2025-05-01
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$129,647
@ $141.69 · 2025-04-22
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$4.97M
@ $165.78 · 2025-03-27
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.02M
@ $165.79 · 2025-03-27
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$273,603
@ $194.32 · 2025-02-27
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$9.35M
@ $207.76 · 2025-01-21
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$560,562
@ $177.39 · 2024-12-02
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.22M
@ $130.49 · 2024-11-15
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.81M
@ $145.27 · 2024-09-16
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$1.49M
@ $134.66 · 2024-08-28
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$6.26M
@ $156.45 · 2024-07-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WSM
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
WSM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View UNH Full AnalysisView WSM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: UNH vs WSM

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Williams-Sonoma, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to WSM's -11.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $203 vs. $227).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Williams-Sonoma, Inc.?

WSM scores 83/100 (Wide moat), while UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. WSM scores 7.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Williams-Sonoma, Inc.?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s 3.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Williams-Sonoma, Inc.?

WSM earns 29.9% ROIC versus UNH's 15.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's or Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s?

WSM's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). WSM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

UNH vs WSM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io