Compare StocksUNH vs WSM

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)

UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$368.78
VS
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$179.99

Rewards

UNH
  • Dividend yield of 2.40% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
WSM
  • Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Williams-Sonoma, Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
WSM
  • PEG ratio of 2.43 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $13.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
UNH
WSM
Valuation
$17.69B
Free Cash Flow
$867.59M
5.28%
FCF Yield
4.05%
27.85
Trailing P/E
20.36
17.77
Forward P/E
17.75
Quality & Moat
15.60%
ROIC
35.42%
11.45%
ROE
52.26%
18.80%
Gross Margin
46.15%
39.79
PEG Ratio
2.43
Balance Sheet Safety
0.74
Debt / Equity
0.70
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.27
2.40%
Dividend Yield
1.69%
UNH: 3Ties: 2WSM: 7
UNHWSM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

WSM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WSM
$3.43
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.33B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
UNH
9.6% Overvalued
Price is 9.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.78
Fair Value: $336.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WSM
15.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 15.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $179.99
Fair Value: $213.07
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $369?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

WSM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $180?

+7.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.8%

The market implies +7.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WSM
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WSM
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 14.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,077
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WSM
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 97.4%Retail & Other 1.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,319
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WSM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $463,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WSM
5
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $60.25M
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $200.00 · 2026-04-17
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$436,366
@ $192.49 · 2026-04-08
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$267,411
@ $188.45 · 2026-04-08
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.90M
@ $180.64 · 2026-03-26
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $183.04 · 2026-03-16
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$7.26M
@ $207.39 · 2026-01-15
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$157,358
@ $205.16 · 2026-01-14
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.39M
@ $179.55 · 2025-11-26
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$695,765
@ $198.79 · 2025-09-24
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$626,951
@ $198.84 · 2025-09-18
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$18.02M
@ $200.17 · 2025-09-15
KING DAVID RANDOLPH
General Counsel
$3.56M
@ $203.60 · 2025-09-08
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.05M
@ $168.18 · 2025-07-15
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$675,852
@ $168.96 · 2025-07-01
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$628,448
@ $157.11 · 2025-06-02
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$4.93M
@ $164.33 · 2025-05-29
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$627,134
@ $156.78 · 2025-05-01
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$129,647
@ $141.69 · 2025-04-22
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.02M
@ $165.79 · 2025-03-27
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$4.97M
@ $165.78 · 2025-03-27
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$273,603
@ $194.32 · 2025-02-27
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$9.35M
@ $207.76 · 2025-01-21
HOWIE JEFFREY E.
Chief Financial Officer
$560,562
@ $177.39 · 2024-12-02
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.22M
@ $130.49 · 2024-11-15
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$5.81M
@ $145.27 · 2024-09-16
YEAROUT KARALYN
Officer
$1.49M
@ $134.66 · 2024-08-28
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$6.26M
@ $156.45 · 2024-07-15
BHARGAVA MONICA
Officer
$2.66M
@ $298.28 · 2024-06-06
KING DAVID RANDOLPH
General Counsel
$2.88M
@ $287.85 · 2024-05-24
ALBER LAURA
Chief Executive Officer
$6.37M
@ $318.53 · 2024-05-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WSM
FearGreed
😨Fear(40/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
WSM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
View UNH Full AnalysisView WSM Full Analysis
UNH vs WSM: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io