Compare StocksUNH vs WMB

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) vs The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB)

UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$368.78
VS
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
$75.54

Rewards

UNH
  • Dividend yield of 2.40% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
WMB
  • Gross margin of 62.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.69 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
WMB
  • Trailing P/E of 35.3x is 56% above the historical average of 22.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.11 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
UNH
WMB
Valuation
$17.69B
Free Cash Flow
$-353.50M
5.28%
FCF Yield
-0.38%
27.85
Trailing P/E
35.30
17.77
Forward P/E
29.07
Quality & Moat
15.60%
ROIC
8.66%
11.45%
ROE
17.44%
18.80%
Gross Margin
62.12%
39.79
PEG Ratio
0.69
Balance Sheet Safety
0.74
Debt / Equity
1.97
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.35
2.40%
Dividend Yield
2.78%
UNH: 7Ties: 1WMB: 4
UNHWMB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

WMB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WMB
$30.77
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$33.38B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
UNH
9.6% Overvalued
Price is 9.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.78
Fair Value: $336.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WMB
153.6% Overvalued
Price is 153.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $75.54
Fair Value: $29.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $369?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

WMB

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WMB
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WMB
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 14.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,077
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WMB
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 89.0%Retail & Other 10.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,207
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WMB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $463,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WMB
6
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.14M
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$143,500
@ $71.75 · 2026-04-01
FAZEL PAYVAND
Officer
$211,989
@ $73.15 · 2026-03-13
RINKE TODD J
Officer
$547,808
@ $74.39 · 2026-03-11
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$150,480
@ $75.24 · 2026-03-02
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$757,115
@ $74.91 · 2026-02-26
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$1.97M
@ $72.92 · 2026-02-24
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$132,780
@ $66.39 · 2026-02-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$120,220
@ $60.11 · 2026-01-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$123,800
@ $61.90 · 2025-12-09
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$242,120
@ $60.53 · 2025-11-12
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$115,240
@ $57.62 · 2025-09-04
LARSEN LARRY C
Chief Operating Officer
$263,115
@ $58.47 · 2025-08-11
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$119,360
@ $59.68 · 2025-08-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$125,400
@ $62.70 · 2025-07-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$122,420
@ $61.21 · 2025-06-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$116,420
@ $58.21 · 2025-05-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$119,060
@ $59.53 · 2025-04-01
LARSEN LARRY C
Officer
$455,520
@ $56.94 · 2025-03-12
DUNN MICHEAL G
Chief Operating Officer
$5.13M
@ $53.04 · 2025-03-07
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$511,520
@ $57.50 · 2025-03-04
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$116,980
@ $58.49 · 2025-03-03
TEPLY CHAD A
Officer
$1.47M
@ $56.46 · 2025-02-27
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$109,840
@ $54.92 · 2025-02-03
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$109,000
@ $54.50 · 2025-01-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$117,200
@ $58.60 · 2024-12-02
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$447,650
@ $56.30 · 2024-11-08
LARSEN LARRY C
Officer
$377,512
@ $56.48 · 2024-11-08
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$105,420
@ $52.71 · 2024-11-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$90,580
@ $45.29 · 2024-10-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$89,580
@ $44.79 · 2024-09-13
PICKLE DEBBIE L
Officer
$1.51M
@ $39.61 · 2024-05-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WMB
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
WMB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
View UNH Full AnalysisView WMB Full Analysis