Compare Stocks › UNH vs VRSK

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, UNH is overvalued at $407, with a DCF intrinsic value of $367 and a margin of safety of -11%. VRSK is fairly valued at $196, with an intrinsic value of $189 and a margin of safety of -4%. Of the two, VRSK has the wider margin of safety.

UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$406.97
VS
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$196.30

Rewards

UNH
  • ★UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
VRSK
  • ★Verisk Analytics, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 70.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Verisk Analytics, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

UNH
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 20.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
VRSK

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    UNH
    VRSK
    Valuation
    $26.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.06B
    7.25%
    FCF Yield
    4.13%
    23.23
    Trailing P/E
    30.15
    17.48
    Forward P/E
    22.57
    Quality & Moat
    11.51%
    ROIC
    24.20%
    15.77%
    ROE
    N/A
    20.05%
    Gross Margin
    70.18%
    1.03
    PEG Ratio
    1.65
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.43
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.58
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.68
    2.28%
    Dividend Yield
    1.02%
    UNH: 7Ties: 1VRSK: 2
    UNHVRSK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    UNH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    VRSK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    UNH
    $-7.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $26.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-196.16B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    VRSK
    $2.02
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.81B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.67B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    UNH
    10.8% Overvalued
    Price is 10.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $406.97
    Fair Value: $367.30
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    VRSK
    3.9% Overvalued
    Price is 3.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $196.30
    Fair Value: $188.93
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    UNH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $407?

    +14.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +4.2%

    The market implies +14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    VRSK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $196?

    +13.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.3%

    The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    UNH
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    VRSK
    91/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    UNH
    -2.45
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    VRSK
    -3.05
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    UNH
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.6%Retail & Other 10.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,333
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    VRSK
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 104.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,373
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    UNH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    VRSK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $449,280
    HENDRICK GREGORY S.
    Director
    $90,080
    @ $180.16 · 2026-02-20
    STEVENSON KIMBERLY S.
    Director
    $179,200
    @ $179.20 · 2026-02-20
    PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
    Director
    $180,000
    @ $180.00 · 2026-02-20
    PURTILL SABRA R
    Director
    $98,078
    @ $217.95 · 2025-10-31
    DAILEY JEFFREY J
    Director
    $108,515
    @ $217.03 · 2025-10-31
    HENDRICK GREGORY S.
    Director
    $108,070
    @ $216.14 · 2025-10-31
    PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
    Director
    $259,800
    @ $259.80 · 2025-08-13
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    UNH
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $944,910
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
    Officer
    $455,910
    @ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
    Officer
    $205,000
    @ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
    Officer
    $284,000
    @ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    VRSK
    3
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.31M
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $73,964
    @ $184.91 · 2026-09-15
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $683,775
    @ $193.43 · 2026-09-01
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $71,980
    @ $179.95 · 2026-08-17
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $696,183
    @ $196.94 · 2026-08-03
    BECKLES KATHY CARD
    Officer
    $394,890
    @ $195.49 · 2026-07-31
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,000
    @ $220.00 · 2026-07-29
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $76,844
    @ $192.11 · 2026-07-15
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $71,816
    @ $179.54 · 2026-06-15
    LISS SAMUEL G.
    Director
    $851,103
    @ $182.21 · 2026-06-05
    LISS SAMUEL G.
    Director
    $1.20M
    @ $177.63 · 2026-06-02
    HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
    Director
    $408,777
    @ $174.99 · 2026-06-01
    HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
    Director
    $400,476
    @ $171.51 · 2026-05-22
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $63,688
    @ $159.22 · 2026-05-15
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,628
    @ $171.57 · 2026-04-15
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $81,884
    @ $204.71 · 2026-03-17
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $65,862
    @ $219.54 · 2025-12-16
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,766
    @ $218.53 · 2025-11-18
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $65,097
    @ $216.99 · 2025-11-17
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $72,669
    @ $242.23 · 2025-10-15
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $76,416
    @ $254.72 · 2025-09-16
    DAFFAN NICHOLAS
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.44M
    @ $265.00 · 2025-09-03
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $589,611
    @ $268.00 · 2025-08-18
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $80,400
    @ $268.00 · 2025-08-15
    DAFFAN NICHOLAS
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $272.03 · 2025-08-04
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $91,164
    @ $303.88 · 2025-07-15
    DAFFAN NICHOLAS
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.63M
    @ $300.86 · 2025-07-03
    BECKLES KATHY CARD
    Officer
    $98,080
    @ $300.86 · 2025-07-03
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $92,670
    @ $308.90 · 2025-06-17
    LISS SAMUEL G.
    Director
    $3.65M
    @ $313.06 · 2025-06-13
    DAFFAN NICHOLAS
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.72M
    @ $318.10 · 2025-06-04
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $671,055
    @ $305.02 · 2025-05-16
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $90,651
    @ $302.17 · 2025-05-15
    GROVER DAVID J.
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $307.68 · 2025-05-09
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $88,614
    @ $295.38 · 2025-04-15
    HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
    Director
    $337,029
    @ $285.86 · 2025-04-07
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $634,689
    @ $288.50 · 2025-03-18
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $86,349
    @ $287.83 · 2025-03-17
    HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
    Director
    $348,229
    @ $295.36 · 2025-03-07
    HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
    Director
    $347,746
    @ $294.95 · 2025-02-07
    BECKLES KATHY CARD
    Officer
    $595,429
    @ $282.06 · 2025-01-17
    HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
    Director
    $321,643
    @ $272.81 · 2025-01-07
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $56,750
    @ $283.75 · 2024-12-16
    SHAVEL LEE M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,200
    @ $283.60 · 2024-11-18
    MANN ELIZABETH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $57,298
    @ $286.49 · 2024-11-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    UNH
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    VRSK
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(56/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    UNH
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    VRSK
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
    View UNH Full AnalysisView VRSK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: UNH vs VRSK

    Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Verisk Analytics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, VRSK trades at a -3.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $189 vs. price $196), compared to UNH's -10.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $367 vs. $407).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Verisk Analytics, Inc.?▼

    VRSK scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?▼

    UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. VRSK scores 6.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Verisk Analytics, Inc.?▼

    UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 7.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s 4.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or Verisk Analytics, Inc.?▼

    VRSK earns 24.2% ROIC versus UNH's 11.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's or Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s?▼

    VRSK's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). VRSK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    UNH vs VRSK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io