Compare StocksTXN vs UAL

Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, TXN is undervalued at $261, with a DCF intrinsic value of $365 and a margin of safety of 28%. UAL is undervalued at $108, with an intrinsic value of $622 and a margin of safety of 83%. Of the two, UAL has the wider margin of safety.

TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$261.01
VS
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$108.49

Rewards

TXN
  • Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • PEG ratio of 0.94 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
UAL
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.19 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

TXN
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 1.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 39.7x is 47% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
UAL
  • FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 6.50 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
TXN
UAL
Valuation
$3.55B
Free Cash Flow
$2.56B
1.49%
FCF Yield
7.26%
39.73
Trailing P/E
10.16
24.52
Forward P/E
7.35
Quality & Moat
20.41%
ROIC
5.46%
35.18%
ROE
23.25%
58.33%
Gross Margin
31.82%
0.94
PEG Ratio
6.50
Balance Sheet Safety
0.39
Net Debt / Equity
1.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.74
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.40
2.18%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
TXN: 8Ties: 1UAL: 3
TXNUAL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
TXN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UAL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
TXN
$3.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UAL
$2.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$9.12B
Δ Market Cap
+$23.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
TXN
17.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 17.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $261.01
Fair Value: $315.99
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UAL
85.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 85.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $108.49
Fair Value: $732.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
TXN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $261?

+19.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +24.7%

The market implies +19.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +24.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UAL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $108?

+4.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.0%

The market implies +4.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
TXN
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UAL
44/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
TXN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UAL
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
TXN
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,671
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UAL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 90.7%Retail & Other 8.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
TXN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UAL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
TXN
1
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $114.87M
ABRAHAM TSEDENIYA
Officer
$1.85M
@ $264.63 · 2026-08-27
CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
Director
$3.20M
@ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$14.71M
@ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.55M
@ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
COX CARRIE SMITH
Director
$2.71M
@ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
KNECHT JULIE C.
Officer
$2.77M
@ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.82M
@ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$7.87M
@ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$13.82M
@ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
KANE KATHARINE
General Counsel
$1.66M
@ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$982,359
@ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$5.00M
@ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$11.12M
@ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$998,771
@ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$5.06M
@ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.19M
@ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
BLUEDORN TODD M
Director
$1.18M
@ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
KOZANIAN HAGOP H
Officer
$1.55M
@ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$15.88M
@ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
GARY MARK
Officer
$5.24M
@ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.50M
@ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$986,604
@ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
BLINN MARK A
Director
$696,647
@ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$670,387
@ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
KIRK RONALD
Director
$1.62M
@ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$164,306
@ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$308,030
@ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$19.85M
@ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$38.65M
@ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$39.32M
@ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.23M
@ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
BLINN MARK A
Director
$1.17M
@ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$401,241
@ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
BLINN MARK A
Director
$106,617
@ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
KIRK RONALD
Director
$2.14M
@ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$2.88M
@ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.49M
@ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$10.19M
@ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$1.81M
@ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$472,514
@ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
GARY MARK
Officer
$940,296
@ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.29M
@ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$27,941
@ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
SANCHEZ ROBERT E
Director
$2.09M
@ $208.80 · 2024-10-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UAL
7
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $49.20M
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$585,000
@ $117.00 · 2026-08-25
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$396,900
@ $132.30 · 2026-08-04
LESKINEN MICHAEL D.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $128.19 · 2026-08-03
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$506,016
@ $120.48 · 2026-07-28
HART BRETT J
President
$3.63M
@ $120.72 · 2026-07-28
ENQVIST TORBJORN J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.40M
@ $119.91 · 2026-07-24
KIRBY JOHN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$18.81M
@ $118.04 · 2026-07-21
KIRBY JOHN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.99M
@ $121.29 · 2026-06-16
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$631,330
@ $90.19 · 2026-05-01
HART BRETT J
President
$2.02M
@ $106.45 · 2026-02-02
KIRBY JOHN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$12.94M
@ $107.86 · 2025-12-03
HARFORD BARNEY
Director
$2.30M
@ $92.84 · 2025-08-12
LESKINEN MICHAEL D.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.10M
@ $91.43 · 2025-07-28
FREYRE MICHELLE
Director
$82,914
@ $92.13 · 2025-07-28
HART BRETT J
President
$2.22M
@ $89.50 · 2025-07-25
ENQVIST TORBJORN J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.84M
@ $92.22 · 2025-07-18
JOJO LINDA P
Officer
$5.71M
@ $95.13 · 2024-11-22
ENQVIST TORBJORN J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.04M
@ $72.00 · 2024-10-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
TXN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UAL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
TXN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
UAL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View TXN Full AnalysisView UAL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: TXN vs UAL

Is Texas Instruments Incorporated or United Airlines Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UAL trades at a 82.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $622 vs. price $108), compared to TXN's 28.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $365 vs. $261).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Texas Instruments Incorporated or United Airlines Holdings, Inc.?

TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while UAL scores 44/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is United Airlines Holdings, Inc. in financial distress?

UAL's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TXN scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Texas Instruments Incorporated or United Airlines Holdings, Inc.?

United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) generates a 7.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated's 1.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Texas Instruments Incorporated or United Airlines Holdings, Inc.?

TXN earns 20.4% ROIC versus UAL's 5.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

TXN vs UAL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io