Compare StocksTTWO vs UNH

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
$201.75
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$280.44

Rewards

TTWO
    UNH
    • 5 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
    • Dividend yield of 3.15% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

    Risks

    TTWO
    • ROIC has declined by 18.6 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. scores only 26/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $2.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    UNH
    • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    UNH
    Valuation
    $1.48B
    Free Cash Flow
    $13.86B
    3.97%
    FCF Yield
    5.45%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    21.18
    25.88
    Forward P/E
    14.08
    Quality & Moat
    -1.51%
    ROIC
    0.64%
    -128.13%
    ROE
    11.85%
    59.29%
    Gross Margin
    18.53%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.00
    Debt / Equity
    0.82
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.40
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.54
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.15%
    TTWO: 2Ties: 1UNH: 6
    TTWOUNH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    TTWO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    UNH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-9.35B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$33.34B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    UNH
    $-7.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $26.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-196.16B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    65.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $201.75
    Fair Value: $576.81
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    UNH
    4.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 4.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $280.44
    Fair Value: $294.90
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    TTWO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $202?

    +11.2%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    UNH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $280?

    +11.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.2%

    The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    26/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    UNH
    64/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    -5.00
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    UNH
    -2.45
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    Insiders 1.4%Institutions 95.8%Retail & Other 2.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,519
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    UNH
    Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.2%Retail & Other 14.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,244
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    UNH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $31.61M
    REX JOHN F
    President
    $5.00M
    @ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
    HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25.02M
    @ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
    GIL KRISTEN
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
    FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
    Director
    $491,786
    @ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
    NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
    Director
    $93,647
    @ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
    FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
    Director
    $511,575
    @ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    6
    Sells (3M)
    23
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $45.96M
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $521,725
    @ $208.69 · 2026-03-09
    DORNEMANN MICHAEL
    Director
    $296,195
    @ $213.09 · 2026-03-05
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $522,525
    @ $209.01 · 2026-03-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $535,637
    @ $213.57 · 2026-03-02
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $248,906
    @ $213.47 · 2026-03-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $30,183
    @ $194.73 · 2026-02-18
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $274,658
    @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $399,953
    @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $321,664
    @ $238.27 · 2025-11-18
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $42,790
    @ $235.11 · 2025-11-17
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-09-08
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $239,570
    @ $239.57 · 2025-09-04
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $474,110
    @ $238.73 · 2025-09-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $239.57 · 2025-09-02
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.61M
    @ $230.64 · 2025-08-28
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $5.11M
    @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
    SLATOFF KARL
    President
    $11.16M
    @ $227.68 · 2025-08-21
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $528,868
    @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $46,227
    @ $233.47 · 2025-08-18
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $231,330
    @ $231.33 · 2025-08-15
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $45,106
    @ $225.53 · 2025-06-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $6.09M
    @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.95M
    @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $37,057
    @ $214.20 · 2025-03-06
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $121,885
    @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $175,118
    @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
    SLATOFF KARL
    President
    $7.02M
    @ $208.13 · 2025-02-25
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $262,197
    @ $187.95 · 2024-12-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $212,221
    @ $187.64 · 2024-12-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $818,545
    @ $176.79 · 2024-11-08
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $358,340
    @ $179.17 · 2024-11-08
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.76M
    @ $175.05 · 2024-11-08
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $124,931
    @ $158.14 · 2024-09-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $182,177
    @ $158.14 · 2024-09-03
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $28,618
    @ $149.83 · 2024-08-19
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $36,432
    @ $167.12 · 2024-06-06
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $2.07M
    @ $162.39 · 2024-06-04
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.32M
    @ $162.05 · 2024-06-03
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $378,138
    @ $151.26 · 2024-05-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    UNH
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $179,645
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $179,645
    @ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
    MCSWEENEY ERIN L
    Officer
    $438,987
    @ $626.23 · 2024-11-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    UNH
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    TTWO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    UNH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    View TTWO Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis