Compare StocksTT vs UNH

Trane Technologies plc (TT) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, TT is overvalued at $483, with a DCF intrinsic value of $399 and a margin of safety of -21%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

TT
Trane Technologies plc
$483.40
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

TT
  • Trane Technologies plc has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Trane Technologies plc scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 32.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

TT
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 37.0x is 33% above the historical average of 27.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.02 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
TT
UNH
Valuation
$2.66B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
2.49%
FCF Yield
4.86%
36.99
Trailing P/E
30.17
28.39
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
20.02%
ROIC
15.60%
36.63%
ROE
12.18%
35.92%
Gross Margin
18.80%
2.02
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.41
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.84
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.82%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
TT: 5Ties: 1UNH: 6
TTUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
TT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
TT
$9.12
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.23B
Δ Market Cap
+$47.73B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
TT
21.2% Overvalued
Price is 21.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $483.40
Fair Value: $398.75
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
TT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $483?

+16.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.6%

The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +17.6%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
TT
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
TT
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
TT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.6%Retail & Other 8.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,449
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
TT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $172,176
HAYES JOHN A
Director
$172,176
@ $430.44 · 2026-03-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
TT
2
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $41.37M
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$2.30M
@ $500.00 · 2026-04-30
KUEHN CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Financial Officer
$3.88M
@ $450.00 · 2026-04-08
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$1.59M
@ $422.70 · 2026-03-06
ELWELL ELIZABETH A
Officer
$268,418
@ $422.71 · 2026-03-06
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$15.24M
@ $422.69 · 2026-03-06
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$3.64M
@ $475.00 · 2026-02-12
KUEHN CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.11M
@ $462.70 · 2026-02-10
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$380,230
@ $462.57 · 2026-02-10
ELWELL ELIZABETH A
Officer
$63,359
@ $462.47 · 2026-02-10
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$2.59M
@ $462.60 · 2026-02-10
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$198,119
@ $451.30 · 2026-02-06
ELWELL ELIZABETH A
Officer
$20,752
@ $451.13 · 2026-02-06
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$445,213
@ $451.08 · 2026-02-06
ELWELL ELIZABETH A
Officer
$264,000
@ $440.00 · 2025-10-30
ELWELL ELIZABETH A
Officer
$170,425
@ $425.00 · 2025-10-01
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$9.22M
@ $410.00 · 2025-09-02
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$3.37M
@ $400.00 · 2025-05-02
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$1.36M
@ $380.00 · 2025-04-30
KUEHN CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.93M
@ $346.96 · 2025-03-05
MAGNER MAIREAD
Officer
$1.25M
@ $346.95 · 2025-03-05
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$1.18M
@ $350.00 · 2025-03-05
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$9.36M
@ $346.95 · 2025-03-05
TURTZ EVAN M.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $346.99 · 2025-03-05
KUEHN CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Financial Officer
$308,108
@ $359.94 · 2025-02-11
MAGNER MAIREAD
Officer
$88,949
@ $360.12 · 2025-02-11
SIMMONS DONALD E
Officer
$429,829
@ $359.99 · 2025-02-11
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$1.12M
@ $360.14 · 2025-02-11
TURTZ EVAN M.
Officer
$171,608
@ $359.77 · 2025-02-11
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$830,239
@ $358.17 · 2025-02-10
KUEHN CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Financial Officer
$275,963
@ $358.39 · 2025-02-10
MAGNER MAIREAD
Officer
$57,698
@ $358.37 · 2025-02-10
TURTZ EVAN M.
Officer
$113,882
@ $358.12 · 2025-02-10
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$984,106
@ $357.34 · 2025-02-04
KUEHN CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Financial Officer
$313,100
@ $357.42 · 2025-02-04
MAGNER MAIREAD
Officer
$70,807
@ $357.61 · 2025-02-04
TURTZ EVAN M.
Officer
$183,723
@ $357.44 · 2025-02-04
MAGNER MAIREAD
Officer
$1.80M
@ $416.00 · 2024-12-04
KUEHN CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Financial Officer
$5.12M
@ $376.62 · 2024-11-04
PITTARD RAYMOND D
Officer
$593,221
@ $328.65 · 2024-08-07
REGNERY DAVID S
Chief Executive Officer
$9.46M
@ $321.25 · 2024-08-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
TT
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
TT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View TT Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: TT vs UNH

Is Trane Technologies plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to TT's -21.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $399 vs. $483).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Trane Technologies plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

TT scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TT scores 6.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Trane Technologies plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Trane Technologies plc's 2.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Trane Technologies plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

TT earns 20.0% ROIC versus UNH's 15.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Trane Technologies plc's or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

TT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). TT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.