Compare StocksTSLA vs WMB

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) vs The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, TSLA is overvalued at $400, with a DCF intrinsic value of $131 and a margin of safety of -206%. WMB is overvalued at $73, with an intrinsic value of $19 and a margin of safety of -292%. Of the two, TSLA has the wider margin of safety.

TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$400.49
VS
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
$73.12

Rewards

TSLA
  • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
WMB
  • Gross margin of 63.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

TSLA
  • ROIC has declined by 21.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
WMB
  • Trailing P/E of 32.1x is 41% above the historical average of 22.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.22 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.94x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
TSLA
WMB
Valuation
$5.25B
Free Cash Flow
$-190.25M
0.35%
FCF Yield
-0.21%
367.42
Trailing P/E
32.07
160.20
Forward P/E
28.48
Quality & Moat
3.23%
ROIC
7.07%
4.90%
ROE
19.66%
19.06%
Gross Margin
63.51%
5.78
PEG Ratio
2.22
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.94
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.60
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.30
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.94%
TSLA: 4Ties: 1WMB: 7
TSLAWMB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
TSLA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

WMB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
TSLA
$50.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.30T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WMB
$30.77
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$33.38B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
TSLA
626.9% Overvalued
Price is 626.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.49
Fair Value: $55.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WMB
230.5% Overvalued
Price is 230.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $73.12
Fair Value: $22.12
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
TSLA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $400?

+50.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +45.1%

The market implies +50.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +45.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

WMB

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
TSLA
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WMB
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
TSLA
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WMB
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
TSLA
Insiders 11.1%Institutions 44.9%Retail & Other 44.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,237
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WMB
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 89.1%Retail & Other 10.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,323
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
TSLA
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999.96M
MUSK ELON REEVE
Chief Executive Officer
$999.96M
@ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
GEBBIA JOSEPH
Director
$1.03M
@ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WMB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
TSLA
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $62.72M
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $402.27 · 2026-06-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.35M
@ $450.00 · 2026-05-13
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.99M
@ $378.11 · 2026-04-30
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.27M
@ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$899,077
@ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$10.69M
@ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$25.61M
@ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$918,137
@ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.77M
@ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$4.86M
@ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$732,573
@ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
Director
$170.64M
@ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$32.73M
@ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.20M
@ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$30.81M
@ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.14M
@ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$32.10M
@ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
Director
$13.19M
@ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$718,111
@ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$33.67M
@ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$27.59M
@ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$43.16M
@ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$41.16M
@ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$975,015
@ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$35.25M
@ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$39.79M
@ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.48M
@ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$35.34M
@ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$34.60M
@ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$15.14M
@ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$65,867
@ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$14.60M
@ $219.96 · 2024-07-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WMB
6
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.20M
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$142,600
@ $71.30 · 2026-06-01
JASEK GLEN G
Officer
$195,383
@ $78.15 · 2026-05-15
LARSEN LARRY C
Chief Operating Officer
$917,820
@ $76.48 · 2026-05-14
PORTER JOHN DEAN
Chief Financial Officer
$3.77M
@ $75.37 · 2026-05-06
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$152,700
@ $76.35 · 2026-05-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$143,500
@ $71.75 · 2026-04-01
FAZEL PAYVAND
Officer
$211,989
@ $73.15 · 2026-03-13
RINKE TODD J
Officer
$547,808
@ $74.39 · 2026-03-11
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$150,480
@ $75.24 · 2026-03-02
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$757,115
@ $74.91 · 2026-02-26
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$1.97M
@ $72.92 · 2026-02-24
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$132,780
@ $66.39 · 2026-02-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$120,220
@ $60.11 · 2026-01-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$123,800
@ $61.90 · 2025-12-09
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$242,120
@ $60.53 · 2025-11-12
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$115,240
@ $57.62 · 2025-09-04
LARSEN LARRY C
Chief Operating Officer
$263,115
@ $58.47 · 2025-08-11
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$119,360
@ $59.68 · 2025-08-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$125,400
@ $62.70 · 2025-07-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$122,420
@ $61.21 · 2025-06-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$116,420
@ $58.21 · 2025-05-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$119,060
@ $59.53 · 2025-04-01
LARSEN LARRY C
Officer
$455,520
@ $56.94 · 2025-03-12
DUNN MICHEAL G
Chief Operating Officer
$5.13M
@ $53.04 · 2025-03-07
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$511,520
@ $57.50 · 2025-03-04
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$116,980
@ $58.49 · 2025-03-03
TEPLY CHAD A
Officer
$1.47M
@ $56.46 · 2025-02-27
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$109,840
@ $54.92 · 2025-02-03
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$109,000
@ $54.50 · 2025-01-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$117,200
@ $58.60 · 2024-12-02
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$447,650
@ $56.30 · 2024-11-08
LARSEN LARRY C
Officer
$377,512
@ $56.48 · 2024-11-08
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$105,420
@ $52.71 · 2024-11-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$90,580
@ $45.29 · 2024-10-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$89,580
@ $44.79 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
TSLA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WMB
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
TSLA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
WMB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View TSLA Full AnalysisView WMB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: TSLA vs WMB

Is Tesla, Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TSLA trades at a -206.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $131 vs. price $400), compared to WMB's -291.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $19 vs. $73).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Tesla, Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc.?

WMB scores 38/100 (None moat), while TSLA scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Williams Companies, Inc. in financial distress?

WMB's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TSLA scores 19.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Tesla, Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc.?

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) generates a 0.3% free cash flow yield, compared to The Williams Companies, Inc.'s -0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Tesla, Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc.?

WMB earns 7.1% ROIC versus TSLA's 3.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.