Compare StocksTRMB vs V

Trimble Inc. (TRMB) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, TRMB is undervalued at $49, with a DCF intrinsic value of $73 and a margin of safety of 32%. V is fairly valued at $327, with an intrinsic value of $304 and a margin of safety of -8%. Of the two, TRMB has the wider margin of safety.

TRMB
Trimble Inc.
$49.16
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$327.24

Rewards

TRMB
  • Gross margin of 71.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.32 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

TRMB
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.10 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • PEG ratio of 2.83 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 27 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
V
  • Insiders have sold $14.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
TRMB
V
Valuation
$370.11M
Free Cash Flow
$20.84B
3.23%
FCF Yield
3.35%
25.74
Trailing P/E
28.55
12.06
Forward P/E
22.02
Quality & Moat
6.56%
ROIC
38.39%
8.25%
ROE
60.35%
71.48%
Gross Margin
97.78%
2.83
PEG Ratio
1.46
Balance Sheet Safety
0.21
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.36
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.33
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.80%
TRMB: 3Ties: 2V: 7
TRMBV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
TRMB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
TRMB
$2.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$6.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
TRMB
32.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 32.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $49.16
Fair Value: $72.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
7.6% Overvalued
Price is 7.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $327.24
Fair Value: $304.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
TRMB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $49?

+8.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +8.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $327?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
TRMB
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
TRMB
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
TRMB
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 98.6%Retail & Other 1.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,134
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,856
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
TRMB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
TRMB
2
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.98M
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$1.12M
@ $67.01 · 2026-04-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$502,050
@ $66.94 · 2026-04-14
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$528,375
@ $70.45 · 2026-03-10
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$49,126
@ $67.02 · 2026-02-27
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$488,550
@ $65.14 · 2026-02-10
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$606,600
@ $80.88 · 2026-01-13
SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
Chief Financial Officer
$181,012
@ $80.45 · 2025-12-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$610,425
@ $81.39 · 2025-12-09
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,506
@ $81.99 · 2025-11-28
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$202,175
@ $80.87 · 2025-11-26
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$128,460
@ $76.83 · 2025-11-17
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$596,250
@ $79.50 · 2025-11-11
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$139,158
@ $81.00 · 2025-11-06
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$567,375
@ $75.65 · 2025-10-14
KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
Officer
$602,015
@ $81.74 · 2025-09-18
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$609,825
@ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
Chief Financial Officer
$182,948
@ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,188
@ $82.41 · 2025-08-28
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$203,875
@ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
LARGE PETER
Officer
$218,228
@ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$621,975
@ $82.93 · 2025-08-12
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$17.46M
@ $83.59 · 2025-08-11
ALLISON JENNIFER
General Counsel
$252,480
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$112,320
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$591,450
@ $78.86 · 2025-07-08
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$115,128
@ $78.00 · 2025-07-03
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$187,500
@ $75.00 · 2025-06-26
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$109,125
@ $72.75 · 2025-06-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$543,525
@ $72.47 · 2025-06-10
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$425,853
@ $70.94 · 2025-06-02
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,112
@ $72.00 · 2025-05-28
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$536,475
@ $71.53 · 2025-05-27
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$466,774
@ $71.69 · 2025-05-21
LARGE PETER
Officer
$77,879
@ $70.80 · 2025-05-12
LARGE PETER
Officer
$126,436
@ $66.55 · 2025-05-08
KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
Officer
$411,036
@ $72.00 · 2025-02-25
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$153,702
@ $71.79 · 2025-02-24
ALLISON JENNIFER
General Counsel
$266,934
@ $74.75 · 2025-01-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $53.88M
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$707,300
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$10.12M
@ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
TRMB
FearGreed
😨Fear(28/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
TRMB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (28)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View TRMB Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: TRMB vs V

Is Trimble Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TRMB trades at a 32.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $73 vs. price $49), compared to V's -7.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $304 vs. $327).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Trimble Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while TRMB scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Trimble Inc. or Visa Inc.?

Visa Inc. (V) generates a 3.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Trimble Inc.'s 3.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Trimble Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V earns 38.4% ROIC versus TRMB's 6.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.