Compare StocksTRMB vs UNH

Trimble Inc. (TRMB) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, TRMB is undervalued at $57, with a DCF intrinsic value of $73 and a margin of safety of 22%. UNH is overvalued at $414, with an intrinsic value of $371 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, TRMB has the wider margin of safety.

TRMB
Trimble Inc.
$56.58
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$414.40

Rewards

TRMB
  • Gross margin of 71.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.32 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

TRMB
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.10 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 22 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
TRMB
UNH
Valuation
$370.11M
Free Cash Flow
$22.76B
2.81%
FCF Yield
6.05%
29.62
Trailing P/E
31.25
13.87
Forward P/E
18.47
Quality & Moat
6.56%
ROIC
14.15%
8.25%
ROE
14.15%
71.48%
Gross Margin
19.51%
1.58
PEG Ratio
1.28
Balance Sheet Safety
0.21
Net Debt / Equity
0.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.36
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.73
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.24%
TRMB: 5Ties: 1UNH: 6
TRMBUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
TRMB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
TRMB
$2.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$6.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
TRMB
22.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 22.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.58
Fair Value: $72.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
11.7% Overvalued
Price is 11.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $414.40
Fair Value: $370.88
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
TRMB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $57?

+10.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.7%

The market implies +10.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

+14.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.6%

The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
TRMB
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
TRMB
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
TRMB
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 98.7%Retail & Other 0.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,097
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 86.1%Retail & Other 13.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,164
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
TRMB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
TRMB
0
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $25.72M
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$1.12M
@ $67.01 · 2026-04-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$502,050
@ $66.94 · 2026-04-14
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$528,375
@ $70.45 · 2026-03-10
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$49,126
@ $67.02 · 2026-02-27
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$488,550
@ $65.14 · 2026-02-10
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$606,600
@ $80.88 · 2026-01-13
SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
Chief Financial Officer
$181,012
@ $80.45 · 2025-12-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$610,425
@ $81.39 · 2025-12-09
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,506
@ $81.99 · 2025-11-28
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$202,175
@ $80.87 · 2025-11-26
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$128,460
@ $76.83 · 2025-11-17
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$596,250
@ $79.50 · 2025-11-11
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$139,158
@ $81.00 · 2025-11-06
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$567,375
@ $75.65 · 2025-10-14
KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
Officer
$602,015
@ $81.74 · 2025-09-18
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$609,825
@ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
Chief Financial Officer
$182,948
@ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,188
@ $82.41 · 2025-08-28
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$203,875
@ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
LARGE PETER
Officer
$218,228
@ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$621,975
@ $82.93 · 2025-08-12
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$17.46M
@ $83.59 · 2025-08-11
ALLISON JENNIFER
General Counsel
$252,480
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$112,320
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$591,450
@ $78.86 · 2025-07-08
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$115,128
@ $78.00 · 2025-07-03
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$187,500
@ $75.00 · 2025-06-26
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$109,125
@ $72.75 · 2025-06-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$543,525
@ $72.47 · 2025-06-10
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$425,853
@ $70.94 · 2025-06-02
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,112
@ $72.00 · 2025-05-28
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$536,475
@ $71.53 · 2025-05-27
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$466,774
@ $71.69 · 2025-05-21
LARGE PETER
Officer
$77,879
@ $70.80 · 2025-05-12
LARGE PETER
Officer
$126,436
@ $66.55 · 2025-05-08
KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
Officer
$411,036
@ $72.00 · 2025-02-25
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$153,702
@ $71.79 · 2025-02-24
ALLISON JENNIFER
General Counsel
$266,934
@ $74.75 · 2025-01-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
TRMB
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
TRMB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View TRMB Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: TRMB vs UNH

Is Trimble Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TRMB trades at a 22.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $73 vs. price $57), compared to UNH's -11.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $371 vs. $414).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Trimble Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while TRMB scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TRMB scores 4.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Trimble Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 6.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Trimble Inc.'s 2.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Trimble Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 14.1% ROIC versus TRMB's 6.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

TRMB vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io