Compare StocksTMUS vs V

T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, TMUS is undervalued at $182, with a DCF intrinsic value of $506 and a margin of safety of 64%. V is fairly valued at $327, with an intrinsic value of $304 and a margin of safety of -8%. Of the two, TMUS has the wider margin of safety.

TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
$181.67
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$327.24

Rewards

TMUS
  • Gross margin of 63.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.64 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

TMUS
  • FCF yield of 7.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (2.12x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.66 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
V
  • Insiders have sold $14.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
TMUS
V
Valuation
$15.43B
Free Cash Flow
$20.84B
7.85%
FCF Yield
3.35%
19.33
Trailing P/E
28.55
13.00
Forward P/E
22.02
Quality & Moat
9.65%
ROIC
38.39%
18.02%
ROE
60.35%
63.28%
Gross Margin
97.78%
0.73
PEG Ratio
1.46
Balance Sheet Safety
2.12
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.50
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.33
2.21%
Dividend Yield
0.80%
TMUS: 5Ties: 1V: 6
TMUSV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
TMUS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
TMUS
$2.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.48B
Δ Market Cap
+$52.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
TMUS
64.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 64.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $181.67
Fair Value: $505.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
7.6% Overvalued
Price is 7.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $327.24
Fair Value: $304.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
TMUS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $182?

+11.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.0%

The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $327?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
TMUS
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
TMUS
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
TMUS
Insiders 55.1%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 1.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,350
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,856
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
TMUS
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.98M
ALMEIDA ANDRE
Officer
$1.00M
@ $196.20 · 2026-05-01
GOPALAN SRINI
Chief Executive Officer
$1.98M
@ $201.82 · 2025-11-06
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$12,446
@ $188.58 · 2024-12-12
ALMEIDA ANDRE
Director
$897,528
@ $235.76 · 2024-12-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
TMUS
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $140.39M
FREIER JON
Chief Operating Officer
$911,810
@ $190.00 · 2026-05-21
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$979,050
@ $195.81 · 2026-05-01
DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
Director
$727,640
@ $221.10 · 2026-03-04
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$3.30M
@ $220.20 · 2026-02-24
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$517,968
@ $222.40 · 2026-02-24
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$17.20M
@ $214.94 · 2026-02-19
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$3.64M
@ $220.38 · 2026-02-18
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$5.80M
@ $214.86 · 2026-02-18
LONG LETITIA A
Director
$306,436
@ $210.32 · 2025-12-05
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$9.70M
@ $215.61 · 2025-11-18
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$539,775
@ $215.91 · 2025-11-17
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$30.82M
@ $239.15 · 2025-09-16
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$11.54M
@ $256.38 · 2025-08-19
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$627,800
@ $251.12 · 2025-08-15
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.96M
@ $240.80 · 2025-07-29
FREIER JON
Officer
$1.75M
@ $250.00 · 2025-07-24
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$49.07M
@ $234.19 · 2025-06-30
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.92M
@ $242.69 · 2025-05-20
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$592,800
@ $237.12 · 2025-05-15
DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
Director
$191,990
@ $263.00 · 2025-03-05
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$6.58M
@ $263.23 · 2025-02-27
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$12.01M
@ $266.82 · 2025-02-26
EWALDSSON ULF
Officer
$5.16M
@ $265.63 · 2025-02-21
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$7.91M
@ $262.66 · 2025-02-20
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.72M
@ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
BAZZANO DARA A
Officer
$525,400
@ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$2.76M
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.49M
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
BAZZANO DARA A
Officer
$1.05M
@ $269.10 · 2025-02-18
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$675,000
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
TAYLOR TERESA A
Director
$1.89M
@ $235.65 · 2025-02-03
LONG LETITIA A
Director
$254,188
@ $231.08 · 2024-12-13
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.57M
@ $239.22 · 2024-11-14
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.51M
@ $237.78 · 2024-11-12
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.67M
@ $233.55 · 2024-10-25
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$9.25M
@ $216.26 · 2024-10-16
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$615,900
@ $205.30 · 2024-10-01
CANO NESTOR
Officer
$1.68M
@ $197.21 · 2024-08-19
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$7.79M
@ $194.81 · 2024-08-13
KING DEEANNE
Officer
$2.93M
@ $190.00 · 2024-08-08
FREIER JON
Officer
$1.82M
@ $181.87 · 2024-08-01
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$532,770
@ $177.59 · 2024-07-01
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$70.71M
@ $176.60 · 2024-06-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $53.88M
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$707,300
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$10.12M
@ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
TMUS
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
TMUS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View TMUS Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: TMUS vs V

Is T-Mobile US, Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TMUS trades at a 64.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $506 vs. price $182), compared to V's -7.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $304 vs. $327).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, T-Mobile US, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while TMUS scores 45/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is T-Mobile US, Inc. in financial distress?

TMUS's Altman Z-Score of 1.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. V scores 8.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, T-Mobile US, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) generates a 7.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Visa Inc.'s 3.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, T-Mobile US, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V earns 38.4% ROIC versus TMUS's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, T-Mobile US, Inc.'s or Visa Inc.'s?

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to TMUS's 91/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.