Compare StocksSBUX vs TMO

Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, SBUX is overvalued at $101, with a DCF intrinsic value of $82 and a margin of safety of -23%. TMO is overvalued at $465, with an intrinsic value of $407 and a margin of safety of -14%. Of the two, TMO has the wider margin of safety.

SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
$100.65
VS
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
$464.61

Rewards

SBUX
  • Starbucks Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Starbucks Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TMO
  • Trailing P/E of 25.5x is 21% below the historical average of 32.3x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 3.85 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

SBUX
  • Gross margin of 21.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 76.8x is 119% above the historical average of 35.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
TMO
  • 21 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
SBUX
TMO
Valuation
$-1.30B
Free Cash Flow
$5.52B
-1.14%
FCF Yield
3.20%
76.83
Trailing P/E
25.53
33.43
Forward P/E
17.05
Quality & Moat
10.48%
ROIC
6.71%
N/A
ROE
13.52%
21.90%
Gross Margin
40.93%
1.35
PEG Ratio
1.55
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.77
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.21
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.53
2.44%
Dividend Yield
0.40%
SBUX: 3Ties: 1TMO: 6
SBUXTMO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
SBUX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TMO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
SBUX
$-9.28
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.95B
Δ Market Cap
$-18.13B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TMO
$0.17
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$17.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.95B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
SBUX
23.0% Overvalued
Price is 23.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $100.65
Fair Value: $81.80
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TMO
14.3% Overvalued
Price is 14.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $464.61
Fair Value: $406.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
SBUX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TMO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $465?

+11.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.6%

The market implies +11.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
SBUX
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TMO
60/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
SBUX
-2.77
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TMO
-2.47
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
SBUX
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 86.8%Retail & Other 13.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,950
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TMO
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,536
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
SBUX
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $994,500
KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
Director
$994,500
@ $85.00 · 2025-11-10
KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
Director
$34,770
@ $91.50 · 2024-09-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TMO
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CHAI NELSON J
Director
$11,038
@ $551.90 · 2024-12-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
SBUX
6
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.32M
BREWER BRADY
Officer
$58,800
@ $100.00 · 2026-06-11
BREWER BRADY
Officer
$154,796
@ $94.33 · 2026-06-05
BREWER BRADY
Officer
$233,621
@ $104.81 · 2026-05-05
KELLY SARA
Officer
$210,000
@ $105.00 · 2026-04-29
BREWER BRADY
Officer
$58,800
@ $100.00 · 2026-04-17
BREWER BRADY
Officer
$147,690
@ $90.00 · 2026-04-06
BREWER BRADY
Officer
$58,800
@ $100.00 · 2026-03-09
KELLY SARA
Officer
$242,800
@ $97.12 · 2026-03-05
BREWER BRADY
Officer
$159,374
@ $97.12 · 2026-03-05
KELLY SARA
Officer
$1.94M
@ $101.37 · 2024-11-29
RUGGERI RACHEL
Chief Financial Officer
$148,414
@ $99.54 · 2024-11-21
RUGGERI RACHEL
Chief Financial Officer
$143,850
@ $99.07 · 2024-11-15
CONWAY MICHAEL AARON
Officer
$305,598
@ $94.03 · 2024-08-15
RUGGERI RACHEL
Chief Executive Officer
$299,916
@ $91.16 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TMO
1
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $110.57M
PETTITI GIANLUCA
President
$185,064
@ $462.66 · 2026-04-27
SHAFER MICHAEL D
Officer
$802,536
@ $499.40 · 2026-03-11
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$2.06M
@ $514.82 · 2026-03-05
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$5.08M
@ $507.75 · 2026-03-04
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$216,480
@ $541.20 · 2026-02-09
LAGARDE MICHEL
Chief Operating Officer
$12.42M
@ $563.56 · 2025-12-04
LAGARDE MICHEL
Chief Operating Officer
$36.13M
@ $582.68 · 2025-12-03
LOWERY FREDERICK M.
Officer
$8.15M
@ $589.81 · 2025-12-02
SHAFER MICHAEL D
Officer
$6.43M
@ $600.00 · 2025-11-25
LAGARDE MICHEL
Chief Operating Officer
$2.76M
@ $594.42 · 2025-11-13
BRITT LISA P
Officer
$622,136
@ $588.59 · 2025-11-12
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$1.73M
@ $580.00 · 2025-11-10
BRITT LISA P
Officer
$5.84M
@ $571.62 · 2025-11-07
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$13.91M
@ $571.33 · 2025-10-27
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$229,660
@ $574.15 · 2025-10-24
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$200,201
@ $500.50 · 2025-09-05
HOLMES JOSEPH R.
Officer
$189,662
@ $492.63 · 2025-08-29
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$5.01M
@ $500.96 · 2025-08-22
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$248,046
@ $500.09 · 2025-08-20
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$8.15M
@ $452.99 · 2025-08-07
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$191,992
@ $479.98 · 2025-07-25
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$164,444
@ $411.11 · 2025-05-12
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$128,979
@ $429.93 · 2025-04-28
BOXER MICHAEL A
General Counsel
$2.01M
@ $532.59 · 2025-03-10
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$9.33M
@ $518.16 · 2025-03-05
SHAFER MICHAEL D
Officer
$945,038
@ $530.92 · 2025-03-03
LOWERY FREDERICK M.
Officer
$9.73M
@ $531.81 · 2025-02-24
CHAI NELSON J
Director
$8,449
@ $528.06 · 2025-02-19
WILLIAMSON STEPHEN
Chief Financial Officer
$11.58M
@ $589.36 · 2025-02-04
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$175,677
@ $585.59 · 2025-02-04
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$10.62M
@ $531.23 · 2024-12-03
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$3.26M
@ $557.89 · 2024-11-01
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$11.01M
@ $550.51 · 2024-10-31
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$11.05M
@ $552.46 · 2024-10-29
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$168,048
@ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
BOXER MICHAEL A
General Counsel
$1.12M
@ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$12.17M
@ $608.45 · 2024-09-04
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$6.17M
@ $617.21 · 2024-07-31
CASPER MARC N
Chief Executive Officer
$9.88M
@ $606.12 · 2024-07-30
PETTITI GIANLUCA
Officer
$180,255
@ $600.85 · 2024-07-26
HOLMES JOSEPH R.
Officer
$525,484
@ $611.03 · 2024-07-26
BRITT LISA P
Officer
$2.22M
@ $613.02 · 2024-07-26
BOXER MICHAEL A
General Counsel
$1.20M
@ $600.85 · 2024-07-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
SBUX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TMO
FearGreed
😨Fear(40/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
SBUX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
TMO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
View SBUX Full AnalysisView TMO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: SBUX vs TMO

Is Starbucks Corporation or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TMO trades at a -14.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $407 vs. price $465), compared to SBUX's -23.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $82 vs. $101).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Starbucks Corporation or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.?

SBUX scores 71/100 (Wide moat), while TMO scores 60/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Starbucks Corporation in financial distress?

SBUX's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TMO scores 3.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Starbucks Corporation or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.?

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) generates a 3.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Starbucks Corporation's -1.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Starbucks Corporation or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.?

SBUX earns 10.5% ROIC versus TMO's 6.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Starbucks Corporation's or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.'s?

TMO's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SBUX's 24/100 (Unsafe). TMO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

SBUX vs TMO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io