Compare StocksPEP vs TMO

PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, PEP is overvalued at $140, with a DCF intrinsic value of $78 and a margin of safety of -79%. TMO is undervalued at $581, with an intrinsic value of $151245065994 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, TMO has the wider margin of safety.

PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$140.34
VS
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc
$581.09

Rewards

PEP
  • PepsiCo, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • PepsiCo, Inc. scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
TMO

    Risks

    PEP
    • High leverage (1.91x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    TMO
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.54 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 21 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    PEP
    TMO
    Valuation
    $7.83B
    Free Cash Flow
    $6.24B
    4.09%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    18.39
    Trailing P/E
    31.22
    15.63
    Forward P/E
    21.12
    Quality & Moat
    17.07%
    ROIC
    7.20%
    51.51%
    ROE
    13.51%
    54.17%
    Gross Margin
    40.99%
    1.51
    PEG Ratio
    1.87
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.91
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.73
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.25
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.28
    4.24%
    Dividend Yield
    0.33%
    PEP: 9Ties: 1TMO: 1
    PEPTMO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    PEP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TMO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    PEP
    $-9.83
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $5.34B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-52.53B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TMO
    $0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $17.29B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$28.76
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    PEP
    78.8% Overvalued
    Price is 78.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $140.34
    Fair Value: $78.47
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TMO
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $581.09
    Fair Value: $151245065993.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    PEP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $140?

    +12.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.2%

    The market implies +12.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    TMO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $581?

    -12.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -8.9%

    The market implies -12.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -8.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    PEP
    88/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TMO
    60/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    PEP
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TMO
    -2.47
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    PEP
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 81.0%Retail & Other 18.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,346
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TMO
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 6.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,509
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    PEP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TMO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    CHAI NELSON J
    Director
    $11,038
    @ $551.90 · 2024-12-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    PEP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.08M
    FLAVELL DAVID JAMES
    General Counsel
    $404,674
    @ $139.54 · 2026-07-27
    LAGUARTA RAMON L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.68M
    @ $167.39 · 2026-03-02
    GALLAGHER MARIE T
    Officer
    $3.99M
    @ $159.55 · 2025-03-04
    LAGUARTA RAMON L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.74M
    @ $154.90 · 2025-03-03
    KRISHNAN RAMKUMAR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $150.97 · 2025-03-03
    WILLIAMS STEVEN C
    Officer
    $2.71M
    @ $150.89 · 2025-03-03
    FLAVELL DAVID JAMES
    General Counsel
    $1.04M
    @ $150.90 · 2025-03-03
    SANTILLI PAULA ALEJANDRA
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $151.89 · 2025-02-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TMO
    1
    Sells (3M)
    21
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $110.60M
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    President
    $226,000
    @ $565.00 · 2026-07-27
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    President
    $185,064
    @ $462.66 · 2026-04-27
    SHAFER MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $802,536
    @ $499.40 · 2026-03-11
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.06M
    @ $514.82 · 2026-03-05
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.08M
    @ $507.75 · 2026-03-04
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $216,480
    @ $541.20 · 2026-02-09
    LAGARDE MICHEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $12.42M
    @ $563.56 · 2025-12-04
    LAGARDE MICHEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $36.13M
    @ $582.68 · 2025-12-03
    LOWERY FREDERICK M.
    Officer
    $8.15M
    @ $589.81 · 2025-12-02
    SHAFER MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $6.43M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-11-25
    LAGARDE MICHEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.76M
    @ $594.42 · 2025-11-13
    BRITT LISA P
    Officer
    $622,136
    @ $588.59 · 2025-11-12
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $580.00 · 2025-11-10
    BRITT LISA P
    Officer
    $5.84M
    @ $571.62 · 2025-11-07
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.91M
    @ $571.33 · 2025-10-27
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $229,660
    @ $574.15 · 2025-10-24
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $200,201
    @ $500.50 · 2025-09-05
    HOLMES JOSEPH R.
    Officer
    $189,662
    @ $492.63 · 2025-08-29
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.01M
    @ $500.96 · 2025-08-22
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $248,046
    @ $500.09 · 2025-08-20
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.15M
    @ $452.99 · 2025-08-07
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $191,992
    @ $479.98 · 2025-07-25
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $164,444
    @ $411.11 · 2025-05-12
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $128,979
    @ $429.93 · 2025-04-28
    BOXER MICHAEL A
    General Counsel
    $2.01M
    @ $532.59 · 2025-03-10
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.33M
    @ $518.16 · 2025-03-05
    SHAFER MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $945,038
    @ $530.92 · 2025-03-03
    LOWERY FREDERICK M.
    Officer
    $9.73M
    @ $531.81 · 2025-02-24
    CHAI NELSON J
    Director
    $8,449
    @ $528.06 · 2025-02-19
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $175,677
    @ $585.59 · 2025-02-04
    WILLIAMSON STEPHEN
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.58M
    @ $589.36 · 2025-02-04
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.62M
    @ $531.23 · 2024-12-03
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.26M
    @ $557.89 · 2024-11-01
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.01M
    @ $550.51 · 2024-10-31
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.05M
    @ $552.46 · 2024-10-29
    PETTITI GIANLUCA
    Officer
    $168,048
    @ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
    BOXER MICHAEL A
    General Counsel
    $1.12M
    @ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
    CASPER MARC N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.17M
    @ $608.45 · 2024-09-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    PEP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TMO
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    PEP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    TMO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View PEP Full AnalysisView TMO Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: PEP vs TMO

    Is PepsiCo, Inc. or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TMO trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $151245065994 vs. price $581), compared to PEP's -78.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $78 vs. $140).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, PepsiCo, Inc. or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc?

    PEP scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while TMO scores 60/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc in financial distress?

    TMO's Altman Z-Score of 1.5 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PEP scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, PepsiCo, Inc. or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc?

    PEP earns 17.1% ROIC versus TMO's 7.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, PepsiCo, Inc.'s or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc's?

    TMO's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to PEP's 34/100 (Unsafe). TMO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.