Compare StocksTFC vs V

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, TFC is undervalued at $48, with a DCF intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of 52%. V is fairly valued at $327, with an intrinsic value of $304 and a margin of safety of -8%. Of the two, TFC has the wider margin of safety.

TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$48.33
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$327.24

Rewards

TFC
    V
    • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 97.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    TFC
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Truist Financial Corporation scores only 10/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.18 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    V
    • Insiders have sold $14.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    TFC
    V
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $20.84B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.35%
    11.96
    Trailing P/E
    28.55
    9.44
    Forward P/E
    22.02
    Quality & Moat
    7.96%
    ROIC
    38.39%
    8.58%
    ROE
    60.35%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    97.78%
    1.20
    PEG Ratio
    1.46
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.28
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.33
    4.23%
    Dividend Yield
    0.80%
    TFC: 4Ties: 1V: 3
    TFCV

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    TFC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    V

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    TFC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-228.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$5.03B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    V
    $5.50
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $44.47B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$244.54B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    TFC
    52.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 52.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $48.33
    Fair Value: $101.55
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    V
    7.6% Overvalued
    Price is 7.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $327.24
    Fair Value: $304.21
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    TFC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    V

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $327?

    +13.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.4%

    The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    TFC
    10/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    V
    99/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    TFC
    -2.41
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    V
    -2.50
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    TFC
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 77.1%Retail & Other 22.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,084
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    V
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,856
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    TFC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    ROGERS WILLIAM H JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.66M
    @ $48.56 · 2024-11-25
    ROGERS WILLIAM H JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.52M
    @ $43.96 · 2024-07-23
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    V
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    TFC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.64M
    POWELL CYNTHIA B
    Officer
    $183,715
    @ $52.49 · 2026-02-02
    MAGUIRE MICHAEL BARON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $651,664
    @ $50.13 · 2026-01-26
    BOYER K DAVID JR
    Director
    $239,682
    @ $46.45 · 2025-11-25
    BENDER BRADLEY D
    Officer
    $566,689
    @ $45.19 · 2025-07-22
    BOYER K DAVID JR
    Director
    $229,444
    @ $46.20 · 2024-12-04
    POWELL CYNTHIA B
    Officer
    $295,208
    @ $44.14 · 2024-07-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    V
    2
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $53.88M
    SUH CHRIS
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.46M
    @ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.70M
    @ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
    CARNEY LLOYD A
    Director
    $201,253
    @ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $699,315
    @ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.57M
    @ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
    TANEJA RAJAT
    Officer
    $7.84M
    @ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
    TANEJA RAJAT
    Officer
    $2.08M
    @ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $707,917
    @ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
    CARNEY LLOYD A
    Director
    $302,832
    @ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.58M
    @ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.59M
    @ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.65M
    @ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $697,329
    @ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.60M
    @ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $4.36M
    @ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
    TANEJA RAJAT
    President
    $18.44M
    @ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $17.10M
    @ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.13M
    @ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $6.32M
    @ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $5.26M
    @ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $889,868
    @ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.98M
    @ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $13.40M
    @ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $12.88M
    @ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.13M
    @ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
    ANDRESKI PETER M
    Officer
    $815,314
    @ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
    MAHON TULLIER KELLY
    Officer
    $11.80M
    @ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $874,480
    @ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.93M
    @ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
    TANEJA RAJAT
    Officer
    $11.15M
    @ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.73M
    @ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $668,603
    @ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $741,996
    @ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.39M
    @ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.38M
    @ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $707,300
    @ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.37M
    @ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
    MAHON TULLIER KELLY
    Officer
    $10.12M
    @ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    TFC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    V
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    TFC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    V
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View TFC Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: TFC vs V

    Is Truist Financial Corporation or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TFC trades at a 52.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $102 vs. price $48), compared to V's -7.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $304 vs. $327).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Truist Financial Corporation or Visa Inc.?

    V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while TFC scores 10/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Truist Financial Corporation in financial distress?

    TFC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. V scores 8.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Truist Financial Corporation or Visa Inc.?

    V earns 38.4% ROIC versus TFC's 8.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Truist Financial Corporation's or Visa Inc.'s?

    V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to TFC's 75/100 (Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.