Compare StocksSTZ vs UNH

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$151.91
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$280.44

Rewards

STZ
  • Constellation Brands, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Constellation Brands, Inc. scores 87/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Dividend yield of 2.69% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
UNH
  • 5 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • Dividend yield of 3.15% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

STZ
  • FCF yield of 7.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
STZ
UNH
Valuation
$1.97B
Free Cash Flow
$13.86B
7.45%
FCF Yield
5.45%
23.85
Trailing P/E
21.18
12.28
Forward P/E
14.08
Quality & Moat
13.47%
ROIC
0.64%
-1.02%
ROE
11.85%
52.14%
Gross Margin
18.53%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.33
Debt / Equity
0.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.96
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.54
2.69%
Dividend Yield
3.15%
STZ: 4Ties: 1UNH: 6
STZUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
STZ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
STZ
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-398.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-19.42B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
STZ
8.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 8.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.91
Fair Value: $166.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
4.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 4.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $280.44
Fair Value: $294.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
STZ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+6.8%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $280?

+11.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.2%

The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
STZ
87/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
STZ
-3.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
STZ
Insiders 19.9%Institutions 78.9%Retail & Other 1.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,411
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.2%Retail & Other 14.9%
No. of Institutional Holders4,244
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
STZ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $340,886
BALDWIN CHRISTOPHER J.
Director
$340,886
@ $170.44 · 2025-07-08
GILES WILLIAM T
Director
$186,390
@ $186.39 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
STZ
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $817,995
GLAETZER SAMUEL J
Officer
$85,345
@ $153.77 · 2026-02-17
BOURDEAU JAMES O
Officer
$138,749
@ $169.00 · 2025-07-21
GLAETZER SAMUEL J
Officer
$593,901
@ $188.54 · 2025-05-13
SER BUSINESS HOLDINGS LP
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$159,060
@ $241.00 · 2024-11-20
SABIA JAMES ANTHONY JR.
President
$8.77M
@ $242.99 · 2024-11-14
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$6.09M
@ $243.58 · 2024-11-14
CAREY KANEENAT KRISTANN
Officer
$78,870
@ $239.00 · 2024-11-13
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.76M
@ $237.24 · 2024-10-29
GLAETZER SAMUEL J
Officer
$370,809
@ $245.57 · 2024-10-14
HANKINSON GARTH
Chief Financial Officer
$8.09M
@ $240.10 · 2024-08-09
MCCARTHY DANIEL J
Director
$468,009
@ $252.43 · 2024-07-26
CAREY KANEENAT KRISTANN
Officer
$254,997
@ $261.00 · 2024-07-12
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$6.54M
@ $261.54 · 2024-05-10
MCGREW MICHAEL
Officer
$827,043
@ $255.50 · 2024-05-03
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.06M
@ $263.25 · 2024-04-19
SABIA JAMES ANTHONY JR.
Officer
$4.16M
@ $263.63 · 2024-04-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $179,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
MCSWEENEY ERIN L
Officer
$438,987
@ $626.23 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
STZ
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
STZ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View STZ Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io