Compare Stocks › STX vs UNH

Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, STX is undervalued at $645, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1047 and a margin of safety of 38%. UNH is overvalued at $407, with an intrinsic value of $367 and a margin of safety of -11%. Of the two, STX has the wider margin of safety.

STX
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
$644.58
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$406.97

Rewards

STX
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 70.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $12.33 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 33.8x is 27% below the historical average of 46.0x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
UNH
  • ★UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

STX
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠28 insider sales totaling $326.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
UNH
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 20.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
STX
UNH
Valuation
$3.10B
Free Cash Flow
$26.50B
2.10%
FCF Yield
7.25%
33.80
Trailing P/E
23.23
9.82
Forward P/E
17.48
Quality & Moat
86.95%
ROIC
11.51%
259.35%
ROE
15.77%
50.35%
Gross Margin
20.05%
0.37
PEG Ratio
1.03
Balance Sheet Safety
0.41
Net Debt / Equity
0.43
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.24
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.58
0.47%
Dividend Yield
2.28%
STX: 7Ties: 1UNH: 4
STXUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
STX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
STX
$40.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.17B
Δ Market Cap
+$128.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
STX
38.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 38.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $644.58
Fair Value: $1047.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
10.8% Overvalued
Price is 10.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $406.97
Fair Value: $367.30
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
STX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $645?

+19.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.7%

The market implies +19.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $407?

+14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.2%

The market implies +14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
STX
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
STX
-2.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
STX
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 84.4%Retail & Other 15.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,607
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.6%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,333
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
STX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
STX
28
Sells (3M)
70
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $532.11M
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$351,411
@ $642.43 · 2026-10-23
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$8.21M
@ $877.91 · 2026-09-21
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$11.94M
@ $772.18 · 2026-09-15
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$75.58M
@ $772.15 · 2026-09-15
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$38.60M
@ $772.17 · 2026-09-15
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$41.24M
@ $782.08 · 2026-09-15
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$384,952
@ $782.42 · 2026-09-14
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$1.46M
@ $781.54 · 2026-09-14
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$4.68M
@ $841.95 · 2026-09-14
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$770,431
@ $779.00 · 2026-09-14
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$38.10M
@ $830.01 · 2026-09-11
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$493,355
@ $862.51 · 2026-09-10
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $862.21 · 2026-09-10
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.16M
@ $862.13 · 2026-09-10
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$570,240
@ $860.09 · 2026-09-10
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$611,332
@ $815.11 · 2026-09-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$24.49M
@ $816.28 · 2026-09-01
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$7.16M
@ $794.84 · 2026-08-24
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$3.42M
@ $847.67 · 2026-08-21
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$15.41M
@ $849.38 · 2026-08-21
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$7.71M
@ $849.38 · 2026-08-21
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$3.35M
@ $849.52 · 2026-08-21
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$8.41M
@ $852.97 · 2026-08-21
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$5.10M
@ $842.97 · 2026-08-20
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$6.78M
@ $920.80 · 2026-08-13
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$743,706
@ $845.12 · 2026-08-07
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$5.66M
@ $781.64 · 2026-08-07
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$11.43M
@ $811.25 · 2026-08-07
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$137,384
@ $817.76 · 2026-08-03
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$10.38M
@ $803.47 · 2026-08-03
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$14.13M
@ $827.30 · 2026-08-03
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$608,950
@ $877.45 · 2026-07-30
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$490,741
@ $905.43 · 2026-07-23
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$18.81M
@ $910.48 · 2026-07-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.64M
@ $924.42 · 2026-07-01
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.20M
@ $880.19 · 2026-06-12
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$1.56M
@ $880.31 · 2026-06-12
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$795,029
@ $880.43 · 2026-06-12
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$870,508
@ $880.19 · 2026-06-12
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$471,426
@ $822.73 · 2026-06-10
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $821.96 · 2026-06-10
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.11M
@ $822.06 · 2026-06-10
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$544,893
@ $821.86 · 2026-06-10
ARUMUGAVELU SHANKAR
Director
$927,680
@ $927.68 · 2026-06-04
BHATT PRATIK
Director
$929,880
@ $929.88 · 2026-06-02
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$663,998
@ $885.33 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$14.60M
@ $900.21 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$12.75M
@ $924.99 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$22.54M
@ $751.29 · 2026-05-20
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$12.69M
@ $815.42 · 2026-05-14
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.46M
@ $770.00 · 2026-05-07
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$17.41M
@ $774.22 · 2026-05-06
TILENIUS STEPHANIE SCHEAR
Director
$1.21M
@ $766.61 · 2026-05-05
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$4.15M
@ $738.37 · 2026-05-04
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$516,595
@ $741.17 · 2026-05-04
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.41M
@ $420.73 · 2026-04-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $406.77 · 2026-03-19
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$42,273
@ $377.44 · 2026-03-13
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$295,192
@ $393.59 · 2026-03-02
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$7.70M
@ $384.76 · 2026-03-02
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$98,400
@ $410.00 · 2026-02-24
CHONG KIAN FATT
Officer
$2.43M
@ $416.48 · 2026-02-23
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.59M
@ $429.27 · 2026-02-02
GELDMACHER JAY L
Director
$414,423
@ $448.02 · 2026-01-30
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$8.93M
@ $442.29 · 2026-01-29
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$234,776
@ $348.85 · 2026-01-26
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$422,626
@ $299.31 · 2026-01-12
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$5.71M
@ $285.56 · 2026-01-02
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$32,984
@ $291.89 · 2025-12-15
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$594,759
@ $295.90 · 2025-12-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $944,910
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$455,910
@ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$205,000
@ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
STX
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
STX
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
UNH
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View STX Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: STX vs UNH

Is Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, STX trades at a 38.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1047 vs. price $645), compared to UNH's -10.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $367 vs. $407).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?▼

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while STX scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?▼

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. STX scores 13.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?▼

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 7.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 2.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?▼

STX earns 86.9% ROIC versus UNH's 11.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Seagate Technology Holdings plc's or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?▼

STX's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). STX has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

STX vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io