Compare StocksSTX vs UNH

Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, STX is overvalued at $1070, with a DCF intrinsic value of $480 and a margin of safety of -123%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

STX
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
$1070.23
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

STX
  • PEG ratio of 0.71 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.80 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

STX
  • FCF yield of 0.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 101.7x is 273% above the historical average of 27.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • High leverage (2.77x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
STX
UNH
Valuation
$1.61B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
0.66%
FCF Yield
4.86%
101.73
Trailing P/E
30.17
39.51
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
58.83%
ROIC
15.60%
1787.97%
ROE
12.18%
41.57%
Gross Margin
18.80%
0.71
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
2.77
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.86
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.29%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
STX: 5Ties: 1UNH: 6
STXUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
STX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
STX
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-492.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$47.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
STX
123.1% Overvalued
Price is 123.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1070.23
Fair Value: $479.75
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
STX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1070?

+37.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +36.0%

The market implies +37.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +36.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
STX
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
STX
-1.47
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
STX
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.2%Retail & Other 11.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,979
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
STX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
STX
21
Sells (3M)
62
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $210.00M
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$1.56M
@ $880.31 · 2026-06-12
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.20M
@ $880.19 · 2026-06-12
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$795,029
@ $880.43 · 2026-06-12
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$870,508
@ $880.19 · 2026-06-12
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $821.96 · 2026-06-10
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$471,426
@ $822.73 · 2026-06-10
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.11M
@ $822.06 · 2026-06-10
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$544,893
@ $821.86 · 2026-06-10
ARUMUGAVELU SHANKAR
Director
$927,680
@ $927.68 · 2026-06-04
BHATT PRATIK
Director
$929,880
@ $929.88 · 2026-06-02
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$14.60M
@ $900.21 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$12.75M
@ $924.99 · 2026-06-01
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$663,998
@ $885.33 · 2026-06-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$22.54M
@ $751.29 · 2026-05-20
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$12.69M
@ $815.42 · 2026-05-14
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.46M
@ $770.00 · 2026-05-07
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$17.41M
@ $774.22 · 2026-05-06
TILENIUS STEPHANIE SCHEAR
Director
$1.21M
@ $766.61 · 2026-05-05
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$4.15M
@ $738.37 · 2026-05-04
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$516,595
@ $741.17 · 2026-05-04
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.41M
@ $420.73 · 2026-04-01
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $406.77 · 2026-03-19
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$42,273
@ $377.44 · 2026-03-13
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$7.70M
@ $384.76 · 2026-03-02
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$295,192
@ $393.59 · 2026-03-02
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$98,400
@ $410.00 · 2026-02-24
CHONG KIAN FATT
Officer
$2.43M
@ $416.48 · 2026-02-23
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$8.59M
@ $429.27 · 2026-02-02
GELDMACHER JAY L
Director
$414,423
@ $448.02 · 2026-01-30
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$8.93M
@ $442.29 · 2026-01-29
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$234,776
@ $348.85 · 2026-01-26
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$422,626
@ $299.31 · 2026-01-12
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$5.71M
@ $285.56 · 2026-01-02
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$32,984
@ $291.89 · 2025-12-15
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$594,759
@ $295.90 · 2025-12-11
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$204,682
@ $272.91 · 2025-12-02
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$5.42M
@ $271.03 · 2025-12-01
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.13M
@ $266.69 · 2025-11-13
ROMANO GIANLUCA
Chief Financial Officer
$15.40M
@ $285.16 · 2025-11-12
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$201,419
@ $288.98 · 2025-11-11
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$408,040
@ $288.98 · 2025-11-11
ARUMUGAVELU SHANKAR
Director
$1.47M
@ $294.56 · 2025-11-10
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$1.62M
@ $270.00 · 2025-11-05
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$5.26M
@ $262.82 · 2025-11-03
TILENIUS STEPHANIE SCHEAR
Director
$545,084
@ $266.41 · 2025-11-03
GELDMACHER JAY L
Director
$336,375
@ $269.10 · 2025-10-31
CHONG KIAN FATT
Officer
$1.93M
@ $272.14 · 2025-10-30
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$318,040
@ $225.56 · 2025-10-13
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$5.00M
@ $249.90 · 2025-10-01
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$79,645
@ $211.26 · 2025-09-16
MORRIS JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$3.00M
@ $195.80 · 2025-09-12
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$721,396
@ $193.30 · 2025-09-11
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$1.30M
@ $191.53 · 2025-09-10
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$3.38M
@ $168.97 · 2025-09-02
CONYERS YOLANDA LEE
Director
$126,599
@ $168.80 · 2025-09-02
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$261,376
@ $151.61 · 2025-08-11
GELDMACHER JAY L
Director
$376,250
@ $150.50 · 2025-08-06
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$3.07M
@ $153.75 · 2025-08-01
LEE JAMES CI
Officer
$714,145
@ $154.41 · 2025-08-01
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$915,275
@ $155.00 · 2025-08-01
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$248,400
@ $144.00 · 2025-07-11
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.89M
@ $144.66 · 2025-07-01
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$77,870
@ $130.00 · 2025-06-16
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$222,353
@ $129.05 · 2025-06-11
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$222,353
@ $129.05 · 2025-06-11
MOSLEY WILLIAM D
Chief Executive Officer
$7.08M
@ $130.19 · 2025-06-09
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$467,220
@ $130.00 · 2025-06-09
TILENIUS STEPHANIE SCHEAR
Director
$344,801
@ $128.04 · 2025-06-05
TEH BAN-SENG
Officer
$9.28M
@ $124.24 · 2025-06-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
STX
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
STX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View STX Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: STX vs UNH

Is Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to STX's -123.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $480 vs. $1070).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while STX scores 32/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. STX scores 4.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 0.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Seagate Technology Holdings plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

STX earns 58.8% ROIC versus UNH's 15.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Seagate Technology Holdings plc's or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

UNH's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to STX's 73/100 (Safe). UNH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Seagate Technology Holdings plc have accounting red flags?

STX's Beneish M-Score of -1.5 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, UNH scores -2.5, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

STX vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io