Compare StocksSNPS vs UNH

Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, SNPS is overvalued at $456, with a DCF intrinsic value of $299 and a margin of safety of -52%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

SNPS
Synopsys, Inc.
$455.51
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

SNPS
  • Gross margin of 82.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.73 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

SNPS
  • ROIC has declined by 14.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Share count has increased by 22% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Trailing P/E of 104.7x is 105% above the historical average of 51.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
SNPS
UNH
Valuation
$3.54B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
4.06%
FCF Yield
4.86%
104.71
Trailing P/E
30.17
26.41
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
1.72%
ROIC
15.60%
3.82%
ROE
12.18%
82.60%
Gross Margin
18.80%
2.84
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.27
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.93
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
SNPS: 2Ties: 1UNH: 9
SNPSUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
SNPS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
SNPS
$8.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$38.71B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
SNPS
52.4% Overvalued
Price is 52.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $455.51
Fair Value: $298.93
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
SNPS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $456?

+20.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.8%

The market implies +20.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +11.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
SNPS
66/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
SNPS
-3.12
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
SNPS
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 91.4%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,059
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
SNPS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $148,904
PAINTER ROBERT G
Director
$148,904
@ $425.44 · 2025-09-11
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
SNPS
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $18.71M
LEE JANET
General Counsel
$132,500
@ $530.00 · 2026-01-12
LEE JANET
General Counsel
$127,500
@ $510.00 · 2026-01-07
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.69M
@ $460.77 · 2025-12-19
KANKANWADI SUDHINDRA
Officer
$7.84M
@ $493.76 · 2025-09-22
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$2.23M
@ $609.77 · 2025-09-05
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.69M
@ $589.01 · 2025-09-02
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$4.25M
@ $471.21 · 2025-06-18
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$3.55M
@ $485.72 · 2025-06-06
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.20M
@ $457.93 · 2025-06-02
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$6.98M
@ $444.42 · 2025-03-06
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.27M
@ $463.75 · 2025-03-03
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$10.54M
@ $506.01 · 2025-01-15
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.70M
@ $553.89 · 2024-08-23
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$305,954
@ $620.60 · 2024-07-15
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$8.22M
@ $620.77 · 2024-07-11
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$20.55M
@ $618.97 · 2024-07-08
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$4.35M
@ $610.52 · 2024-07-03
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$10.30M
@ $603.27 · 2024-07-01
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$6.66M
@ $602.06 · 2024-06-27
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$4.05M
@ $600.40 · 2024-06-25
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$2.03M
@ $611.41 · 2024-06-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
SNPS
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
SNPS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View SNPS Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: SNPS vs UNH

Is Synopsys, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to SNPS's -52.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $299 vs. $456).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Synopsys, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while SNPS scores 66/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SNPS scores 3.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Synopsys, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Synopsys, Inc.'s 4.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Synopsys, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 15.6% ROIC versus SNPS's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.