Compare StocksSLB vs V

SLB N.V. (SLB) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, SLB is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $191 and a margin of safety of 74%. V is overvalued at $366, with an intrinsic value of $311 and a margin of safety of -18%. Of the two, SLB has the wider margin of safety.

SLB
SLB N.V.
$49.59
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$366.13

Rewards

SLB
  • SLB N.V. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • SLB N.V. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

SLB
  • Gross margin of 17.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.14 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
V
  • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $35.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
SLB
V
Valuation
$4.54B
Free Cash Flow
$20.40B
6.17%
FCF Yield
2.98%
24.19
Trailing P/E
31.16
15.19
Forward P/E
24.49
Quality & Moat
9.11%
ROIC
39.37%
12.91%
ROE
61.19%
16.99%
Gross Margin
97.72%
1.67
PEG Ratio
1.66
Balance Sheet Safety
0.32
Net Debt / Equity
0.29
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.32
2.38%
Dividend Yield
0.73%
SLB: 4Ties: 2V: 6
SLBV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
SLB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
SLB
$-2.44
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.59B
Δ Market Cap
$-18.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$243.21B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
SLB
71.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 71.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $49.59
Fair Value: $173.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
17.6% Overvalued
Price is 17.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $366.13
Fair Value: $311.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
SLB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $50?

+9.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.4%

The market implies +9.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $366?

+15.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.9%

The market implies +15.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
SLB
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
SLB
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
SLB
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.1%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,233
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 89.4%Retail & Other 10.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,880
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
SLB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
SLB
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $23.08M
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.42M
@ $56.99 · 2026-05-27
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$108,660
@ $54.33 · 2026-05-07
GASSEN STEVE MATTHEW
Officer
$3.00M
@ $56.18 · 2026-05-01
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.41M
@ $56.48 · 2026-04-29
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$208,100
@ $52.02 · 2026-03-26
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.26M
@ $50.56 · 2026-03-25
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.30M
@ $52.00 · 2026-02-25
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.26M
@ $50.40 · 2026-01-28
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$921,542
@ $49.50 · 2026-01-26
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.98M
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$3.03M
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$201,160
@ $50.29 · 2026-01-26
GUILD HOWARD
Officer
$659,420
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
COLEMAN PETER JOHN
Director
$197,010
@ $35.82 · 2025-11-26
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.41M
@ $36.75 · 2025-11-13
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.26M
@ $37.69 · 2025-11-11
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$1.43M
@ $36.08 · 2025-09-12
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$167,900
@ $33.58 · 2025-05-22
RAMAN APARNA
Officer
$1.06M
@ $42.28 · 2025-03-28
RENNICK GAVIN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $40.92 · 2025-02-26
RANDO BEJAR CARMEN
Officer
$223,252
@ $40.41 · 2025-01-31
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.49M
@ $41.44 · 2025-01-29
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$1.90M
@ $43.96 · 2025-01-21
KASIBHATLA VIJAY
Officer
$1.10M
@ $43.94 · 2025-01-21
PRECHNER UGO
Officer
$309,435
@ $44.20 · 2025-01-21
AL MOGHARBEL KHALED
Officer
$5.43M
@ $44.09 · 2025-01-21
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.97M
@ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
GUILD HOWARD
Officer
$595,228
@ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$512,294
@ $44.47 · 2024-11-13
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.51M
@ $41.90 · 2024-10-24
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$430,055
@ $43.01 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
5
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $83.21M
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$20.90M
@ $364.97 · 2026-07-30
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$729,720
@ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$7.13M
@ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$707,300
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$10.12M
@ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
SLB
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
SLB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View SLB Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: SLB vs V

Is SLB N.V. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SLB trades at a 74.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $191 vs. price $50), compared to V's -17.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $311 vs. $366).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, SLB N.V. or Visa Inc.?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while SLB scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is SLB N.V. in financial distress?

SLB's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. V scores 8.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, SLB N.V. or Visa Inc.?

SLB N.V. (SLB) generates a 6.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Visa Inc.'s 3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, SLB N.V. or Visa Inc.?

V earns 39.4% ROIC versus SLB's 9.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, SLB N.V.'s or Visa Inc.'s?

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SLB's 85/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

SLB vs V: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io