Compare StocksSCHW vs UNH

The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, SCHW is undervalued at $105, with a DCF intrinsic value of $272 and a margin of safety of 61%. UNH is overvalued at $414, with an intrinsic value of $371 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, SCHW has the wider margin of safety.

SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
$105.24
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$414.40

Rewards

SCHW
  • Gross margin of 97.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 100.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.89 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

SCHW
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.41 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $7.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
SCHW
UNH
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$22.76B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.05%
19.17
Trailing P/E
31.25
13.44
Forward P/E
18.47
Quality & Moat
12.23%
ROIC
14.15%
20.28%
ROE
14.15%
97.50%
Gross Margin
19.51%
1.06
PEG Ratio
1.28
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.73
1.22%
Dividend Yield
2.24%
SCHW: 6Ties: 1UNH: 2
SCHWUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
SCHW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
SCHW
$1.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$12.98B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.38B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
SCHW
61.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 61.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $105.24
Fair Value: $272.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
11.7% Overvalued
Price is 11.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $414.40
Fair Value: $370.88
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
SCHW

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

+14.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.6%

The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
SCHW
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
SCHW
-2.16
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
SCHW
Insiders 6.2%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,973
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 86.1%Retail & Other 13.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,164
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
SCHW
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.85M
WURSTER RICHARD A.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.85M
@ $84.23 · 2026-05-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
SCHW
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $21.52M
HOWARD DENNIS
Chief Technology Officer
$2.94M
@ $105.01 · 2026-07-28
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$3.43M
@ $104.01 · 2026-07-27
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$709,341
@ $102.03 · 2026-07-23
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$422,069
@ $104.14 · 2026-07-21
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$4.09M
@ $99.00 · 2026-04-14
HOWARD DENNIS
Chief Technology Officer
$956,228
@ $94.60 · 2026-03-03
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$681,454
@ $94.61 · 2026-03-03
HOWARD DENNIS
Officer
$2.65M
@ $95.02 · 2026-02-25
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$792,796
@ $104.38 · 2026-02-02
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$4.85M
@ $97.00 · 2025-08-27
WURSTER RICHARD A.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.03M
@ $99.16 · 2025-07-29
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$2.36M
@ $97.91 · 2025-07-29
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$1.88M
@ $90.01 · 2025-06-18
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$2.21M
@ $88.20 · 2025-05-28
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$889,295
@ $87.39 · 2025-05-22
RUFFEL CHARLES ANTHONY
Director
$486,986
@ $87.65 · 2025-05-21
BETTINGER WALTER W II
Chairman of the Board
$17.05M
@ $89.00 · 2025-05-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
SCHW
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
SCHW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View SCHW Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: SCHW vs UNH

Is The Charles Schwab Corporation or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SCHW trades at a 61.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $272 vs. price $105), compared to UNH's -11.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $371 vs. $414).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Charles Schwab Corporation or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while SCHW scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Charles Schwab Corporation in financial distress?

SCHW's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Charles Schwab Corporation or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 14.1% ROIC versus SCHW's 12.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Charles Schwab Corporation's or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

SCHW's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). SCHW has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

SCHW vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io