Compare StocksRTX vs VZ

RTX Corporation (RTX) vs Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, RTX is overvalued at $186, with a DCF intrinsic value of $119 and a margin of safety of -56%. VZ is overvalued at $45, with an intrinsic value of $40 and a margin of safety of -14%. Of the two, VZ has the wider margin of safety.

RTX
RTX Corporation
$185.60
VS
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
$45.37

Rewards

RTX
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.48 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
VZ
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • FCF yield of 10.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.88 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

RTX
  • Gross margin of 20.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 2.56 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
VZ
  • High leverage (1.84x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.24 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $3.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
RTX
VZ
Valuation
$7.23B
Free Cash Flow
$19.61B
2.89%
FCF Yield
10.35%
34.89
Trailing P/E
11.07
24.49
Forward P/E
8.62
Quality & Moat
8.80%
ROIC
9.06%
11.57%
ROE
17.20%
20.21%
Gross Margin
58.91%
2.56
PEG Ratio
0.88
Balance Sheet Safety
0.47
Net Debt / Equity
1.84
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.77
1.48%
Dividend Yield
6.06%
RTX: 2Ties: 2VZ: 8
RTXVZ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
RTX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

VZ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
RTX
$21.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$98.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VZ
$0.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$12.54B
Δ Market Cap
+$6.29B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
RTX
56.1% Overvalued
Price is 56.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $185.60
Fair Value: $118.87
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VZ
13.8% Overvalued
Price is 13.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $45.37
Fair Value: $39.87
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
RTX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $186?

+15.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.8%

The market implies +15.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

VZ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $45?

+8.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.3%

The market implies +8.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
RTX
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
VZ
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
RTX
-2.30
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VZ
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
RTX
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 81.6%Retail & Other 18.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,073
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VZ
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 70.4%Retail & Other 29.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,047
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
RTX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
WINNEFELD JAMES A. JR.
Director
$23,580
@ $117.90 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VZ
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
RTX
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $43.86M
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$2.58M
@ $202.83 · 2026-02-23
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$3.10M
@ $204.65 · 2026-02-19
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.96M
@ $203.80 · 2026-02-19
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$7.35M
@ $205.56 · 2026-02-19
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.64M
@ $201.30 · 2026-02-13
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$3.49M
@ $199.16 · 2026-02-12
JOHNSON AMY L.
Officer
$1.58M
@ $195.03 · 2026-02-10
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$858,278
@ $178.32 · 2025-10-27
ATKINSON TRACY A
Director
$500,948
@ $178.91 · 2025-10-24
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$873,528
@ $180.15 · 2025-10-24
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$4.15M
@ $159.79 · 2025-08-27
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$1.19M
@ $155.20 · 2025-08-12
JASPER PHILIP J
Officer
$2.03M
@ $157.82 · 2025-08-04
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.36M
@ $156.20 · 2025-07-24
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$222,600
@ $152.26 · 2025-07-23
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$2.33M
@ $137.62 · 2025-06-03
JOHNSON AMY L.
Officer
$528,777
@ $127.54 · 2025-05-06
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $130.36 · 2025-02-27
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$2.10M
@ $130.35 · 2025-02-27
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$2.46M
@ $126.82 · 2025-02-25
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$361,736
@ $125.95 · 2025-02-24
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.30M
@ $125.08 · 2025-02-19
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$1.95M
@ $124.45 · 2025-02-18
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$1.81M
@ $129.23 · 2025-02-05
HAYES GREGORY J
Officer and Director
$15.88M
@ $117.74 · 2024-07-31
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$498,908
@ $115.43 · 2024-07-30
JOHNSON AMY L.
Officer
$766,864
@ $113.88 · 2024-07-29
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$482,790
@ $114.00 · 2024-07-29
JASPER PHILIP J
Officer
$1.39M
@ $113.65 · 2024-07-29
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$260,401
@ $114.71 · 2024-07-26
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$773,604
@ $114.76 · 2024-07-26
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$2.02M
@ $114.87 · 2024-07-26
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$938,766
@ $114.96 · 2024-07-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VZ
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.35M
HAMMOCK SAMANTHA
Officer
$3.50M
@ $47.83 · 2026-05-29
STILLWELL MARY-LEE
Officer
$428,450
@ $50.00 · 2026-03-02
RUSSO JOSEPH J.
Officer
$429,906
@ $44.88 · 2026-02-02
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$438,101
@ $43.81 · 2025-05-08
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$396,900
@ $44.10 · 2025-05-07
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$329,062
@ $43.87 · 2025-04-30
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$430,240
@ $43.02 · 2025-04-24
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$212,425
@ $42.48 · 2025-04-23
VENKATESH VANDANA
Officer
$437,939
@ $43.79 · 2025-02-25
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$261,623
@ $39.70 · 2025-02-04
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$319,080
@ $39.88 · 2025-02-03
MALADY KYLE
Chief Executive Officer
$453,155
@ $40.88 · 2025-01-29
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$809,800
@ $40.49 · 2025-01-28
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$810,800
@ $40.54 · 2025-01-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
RTX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VZ
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
RTX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
VZ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View RTX Full AnalysisView VZ Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: RTX vs VZ

Is RTX Corporation or Verizon Communications Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, VZ trades at a -13.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $40 vs. price $45), compared to RTX's -56.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $119 vs. $186).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, RTX Corporation or Verizon Communications Inc.?

VZ scores 55/100 (Narrow moat), while RTX scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Verizon Communications Inc. in financial distress?

VZ's Altman Z-Score of 1.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RTX scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, RTX Corporation or Verizon Communications Inc.?

Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) generates a 10.4% free cash flow yield, compared to RTX Corporation's 2.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, RTX Corporation or Verizon Communications Inc.?

VZ earns 9.1% ROIC versus RTX's 8.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, RTX Corporation's or Verizon Communications Inc.'s?

VZ's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to RTX's 78/100 (Safe). VZ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.